The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Measuring long-term disease control in atopic dermatitis: a validation study of well controlled weeks

Measuring long-term disease control in atopic dermatitis: a validation study of well controlled weeks
Measuring long-term disease control in atopic dermatitis: a validation study of well controlled weeks

Background Because atopic dermatitis (AD) is a relapsing, remitting disease, assessing long-term control is important. Well controlled weeks (WCWs) have been used to assess asthma long-term control, but never validated for AD. Objectives: To assess feasibility, validity and interpretability of WCWs in AD patients.

Methods Three studies of patients with moderate-to-severe AD including 4-6 months of daily/weekly symptom and treatment use data were evaluated (Study A: n=336; Study B: n=60; Study C: n=224). WCWs were defined by worsening symptoms and increased medication use. Feasibility, construct validity and interpretability of WCWs were determined by assessing missing data, association with validated AD outcomes, and floor/ceiling effects. Analysis used linear and logistic regression.

Results WCWs were feasible to collect - 95.2% (study A) and 94.7% (study B) contributed data for at least half of the weekly data-points, and 93.2% and 88.7% contributed to all data-points up to 4 months. WCWs were significantly associated with validated AD severity instruments including patient-reported (POEM) and objective signs (EASI, TIS and SASSAD). The odds of experiencing a WCW if AD severity was clear/mild was 5.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5 to 9.7), 1.9 (95%CI 0.8 to 4.4) and 8.1 (95%CI 4.5 to 14.6) in Studies A, B and C, respectively. WCWs were associated with ceiling effects- 31.6% (study A) and 37.5% (study B) of participants had no WCWs for >90% of the time.

Conclusions WCWs are valid and feasible for measuring long-term control in AD trials. However, ceiling effects and burden of data collection may limit use.

0091-6749
1580-1586
Langan, Sinead M
34b0a654-2b99-424a-893a-f4b5eee197ee
Stuart, Beth
626862fc-892b-4f6d-9cbb-7a8d7172b209
Bradshaw, Lucy
803184fe-23e7-497c-a1e8-a79d22359c25
Schmitt, Jochen
cfa055d1-9a2e-4d7c-a57a-78517ee5372b
Williams, Hywel C.
3914e691-2348-4704-a044-e8d2af92444e
Thomas, Kim S
b3bc044e-811d-4dcb-ad36-7c6018c4bb04
Langan, Sinead M
34b0a654-2b99-424a-893a-f4b5eee197ee
Stuart, Beth
626862fc-892b-4f6d-9cbb-7a8d7172b209
Bradshaw, Lucy
803184fe-23e7-497c-a1e8-a79d22359c25
Schmitt, Jochen
cfa055d1-9a2e-4d7c-a57a-78517ee5372b
Williams, Hywel C.
3914e691-2348-4704-a044-e8d2af92444e
Thomas, Kim S
b3bc044e-811d-4dcb-ad36-7c6018c4bb04

Langan, Sinead M, Stuart, Beth, Bradshaw, Lucy, Schmitt, Jochen, Williams, Hywel C. and Thomas, Kim S (2017) Measuring long-term disease control in atopic dermatitis: a validation study of well controlled weeks. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 140 (6), 1580-1586. (doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.043).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background Because atopic dermatitis (AD) is a relapsing, remitting disease, assessing long-term control is important. Well controlled weeks (WCWs) have been used to assess asthma long-term control, but never validated for AD. Objectives: To assess feasibility, validity and interpretability of WCWs in AD patients.

Methods Three studies of patients with moderate-to-severe AD including 4-6 months of daily/weekly symptom and treatment use data were evaluated (Study A: n=336; Study B: n=60; Study C: n=224). WCWs were defined by worsening symptoms and increased medication use. Feasibility, construct validity and interpretability of WCWs were determined by assessing missing data, association with validated AD outcomes, and floor/ceiling effects. Analysis used linear and logistic regression.

Results WCWs were feasible to collect - 95.2% (study A) and 94.7% (study B) contributed data for at least half of the weekly data-points, and 93.2% and 88.7% contributed to all data-points up to 4 months. WCWs were significantly associated with validated AD severity instruments including patient-reported (POEM) and objective signs (EASI, TIS and SASSAD). The odds of experiencing a WCW if AD severity was clear/mild was 5.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5 to 9.7), 1.9 (95%CI 0.8 to 4.4) and 8.1 (95%CI 4.5 to 14.6) in Studies A, B and C, respectively. WCWs were associated with ceiling effects- 31.6% (study A) and 37.5% (study B) of participants had no WCWs for >90% of the time.

Conclusions WCWs are valid and feasible for measuring long-term control in AD trials. However, ceiling effects and burden of data collection may limit use.

Text
WCW validation_jan23_accepted - Accepted Manuscript
Download (61kB)
Text
1-s2.0-S0091674917306772-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (291kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 February 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 April 2017
Published date: December 2017
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 407620
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/407620
ISSN: 0091-6749
PURE UUID: 18d92c45-90aa-4136-bacd-1963da8be028
ORCID for Beth Stuart: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-7437

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Apr 2017 17:05
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sinead M Langan
Author: Beth Stuart ORCID iD
Author: Lucy Bradshaw
Author: Jochen Schmitt
Author: Hywel C. Williams
Author: Kim S Thomas

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×