The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

GS Media and its implications for the construction of the right of communication to the public within EU copyright architecture

GS Media and its implications for the construction of the right of communication to the public within EU copyright architecture
GS Media and its implications for the construction of the right of communication to the public within EU copyright architecture
In its 2016 decision in GS Media, C-160/15 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) sought to clarify under what conditions the provision of a link to a work protected by copyright made available on a third-party website (where it is freely accessible) without a licence from the relevant rightholder falls within the scope of the right of communication to the public within Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive.

In its decision the CJEU held that whether linking to unlicensed content falls within or outside the scope of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive depends – crucially – on whether the link provider has a profit-making intention or knowledge of the unlicensed character of the work linked to.

This article assesses the implications of the GS Media decision in respect of linking, and – more generally – the construction of the right of communication to the public.

The main conclusion is that GS Media imposes a re-consideration of what amounts to an act of communication to the public.

Yet, the forthcoming CJEU decisions in pending references for a preliminary ruling (Filmspeler, C-527/15, and Ziggo, C-601/15) might lead to a relaxation of the concept of 'indispensable intervention', thus broadening the notion of who makes an act of communication to the public.

Ultimately the discussion undertaken in this contribution suggests that the concept of ‘communication to the public’ has been undergoing an evolution. The next frontier for Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive appears to be not just a determination of what amounts to an act of communication to the public, but also who makes an act of communication to the public. The latter in particular is the next question for the CJEU to tackle, and also poses significant – and not entirely worked out – challenges to EU policy- and law-making.
0165-0750
1221-1242
Rosati, Eleonora
bd04e7f8-e14b-4e43-975e-77bc5abaa8a4
Rosati, Eleonora
bd04e7f8-e14b-4e43-975e-77bc5abaa8a4

Rosati, Eleonora (2017) GS Media and its implications for the construction of the right of communication to the public within EU copyright architecture. Common Market Law Review, 54 (4), 1221-1242.

Record type: Article

Abstract

In its 2016 decision in GS Media, C-160/15 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) sought to clarify under what conditions the provision of a link to a work protected by copyright made available on a third-party website (where it is freely accessible) without a licence from the relevant rightholder falls within the scope of the right of communication to the public within Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive.

In its decision the CJEU held that whether linking to unlicensed content falls within or outside the scope of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive depends – crucially – on whether the link provider has a profit-making intention or knowledge of the unlicensed character of the work linked to.

This article assesses the implications of the GS Media decision in respect of linking, and – more generally – the construction of the right of communication to the public.

The main conclusion is that GS Media imposes a re-consideration of what amounts to an act of communication to the public.

Yet, the forthcoming CJEU decisions in pending references for a preliminary ruling (Filmspeler, C-527/15, and Ziggo, C-601/15) might lead to a relaxation of the concept of 'indispensable intervention', thus broadening the notion of who makes an act of communication to the public.

Ultimately the discussion undertaken in this contribution suggests that the concept of ‘communication to the public’ has been undergoing an evolution. The next frontier for Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive appears to be not just a determination of what amounts to an act of communication to the public, but also who makes an act of communication to the public. The latter in particular is the next question for the CJEU to tackle, and also poses significant – and not entirely worked out – challenges to EU policy- and law-making.

Text
GS Media and its implications for the construction of the right of communication to the public within the EU copyright architecture (E Rosati) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (282kB)
Text
Journals_COLA_COLA2017095 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 March 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 April 2017
Published date: 2017
Organisations: Southampton Law School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 407938
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/407938
ISSN: 0165-0750
PURE UUID: a598b5e8-f6cf-4f66-afc4-7fcf7c423401
ORCID for Eleonora Rosati: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7357-5978

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 May 2017 01:03
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:13

Export record

Contributors

Author: Eleonora Rosati ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×