GS Media and its implications for the construction of the right of communication to the public within EU copyright architecture
GS Media and its implications for the construction of the right of communication to the public within EU copyright architecture
In its 2016 decision in GS Media, C-160/15 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) sought to clarify under what conditions the provision of a link to a work protected by copyright made available on a third-party website (where it is freely accessible) without a licence from the relevant rightholder falls within the scope of the right of communication to the public within Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive.
In its decision the CJEU held that whether linking to unlicensed content falls within or outside the scope of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive depends – crucially – on whether the link provider has a profit-making intention or knowledge of the unlicensed character of the work linked to.
This article assesses the implications of the GS Media decision in respect of linking, and – more generally – the construction of the right of communication to the public.
The main conclusion is that GS Media imposes a re-consideration of what amounts to an act of communication to the public.
Yet, the forthcoming CJEU decisions in pending references for a preliminary ruling (Filmspeler, C-527/15, and Ziggo, C-601/15) might lead to a relaxation of the concept of 'indispensable intervention', thus broadening the notion of who makes an act of communication to the public.
Ultimately the discussion undertaken in this contribution suggests that the concept of ‘communication to the public’ has been undergoing an evolution. The next frontier for Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive appears to be not just a determination of what amounts to an act of communication to the public, but also who makes an act of communication to the public. The latter in particular is the next question for the CJEU to tackle, and also poses significant – and not entirely worked out – challenges to EU policy- and law-making.
1221-1242
Rosati, Eleonora
bd04e7f8-e14b-4e43-975e-77bc5abaa8a4
2017
Rosati, Eleonora
bd04e7f8-e14b-4e43-975e-77bc5abaa8a4
Rosati, Eleonora
(2017)
GS Media and its implications for the construction of the right of communication to the public within EU copyright architecture.
Common Market Law Review, 54 (4), .
Abstract
In its 2016 decision in GS Media, C-160/15 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) sought to clarify under what conditions the provision of a link to a work protected by copyright made available on a third-party website (where it is freely accessible) without a licence from the relevant rightholder falls within the scope of the right of communication to the public within Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive.
In its decision the CJEU held that whether linking to unlicensed content falls within or outside the scope of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive depends – crucially – on whether the link provider has a profit-making intention or knowledge of the unlicensed character of the work linked to.
This article assesses the implications of the GS Media decision in respect of linking, and – more generally – the construction of the right of communication to the public.
The main conclusion is that GS Media imposes a re-consideration of what amounts to an act of communication to the public.
Yet, the forthcoming CJEU decisions in pending references for a preliminary ruling (Filmspeler, C-527/15, and Ziggo, C-601/15) might lead to a relaxation of the concept of 'indispensable intervention', thus broadening the notion of who makes an act of communication to the public.
Ultimately the discussion undertaken in this contribution suggests that the concept of ‘communication to the public’ has been undergoing an evolution. The next frontier for Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive appears to be not just a determination of what amounts to an act of communication to the public, but also who makes an act of communication to the public. The latter in particular is the next question for the CJEU to tackle, and also poses significant – and not entirely worked out – challenges to EU policy- and law-making.
Text
GS Media and its implications for the construction of the right of communication to the public within the EU copyright architecture (E Rosati)
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Journals_COLA_COLA2017095
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 29 March 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 April 2017
Published date: 2017
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 407938
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/407938
ISSN: 0165-0750
PURE UUID: a598b5e8-f6cf-4f66-afc4-7fcf7c423401
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 May 2017 01:03
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:13
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Eleonora Rosati
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics