The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pilot and feasibility studies: what's the point?

Pilot and feasibility studies: what's the point?
Pilot and feasibility studies: what's the point?
Background: the appropriateness of research design and methodology of clinical trials is paramount if we are to succeed in reducing the amount of waste in research. Pilot and feasibility studies serve an important role in determining the most appropriate design and whether the trial will succeed to completion.

Aims and objectives: the study will assess the role of pilot and feasibility studies in the design of clinical trials funded by the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme.

Method: there are three phases to the study: 1. Literature review, 2. Review of the ongoing HTA trial portfolio and, 3. Review of the HTA portfolio of published trials to determine the added value of the inclusion of a pilot or feasibility study. A list of HTA trials will be retrieved from three cohorts: completed standalone pilot or feasibility studies; completed and ongoing clinical trials which include an internal pilot or feasibility study; and successful applications in pre-contracting status in the HTA programme.

Results: the results of the study will still be in development. The number of included trials and proposed checklist/classification system will be presented to determine how pilot and feasibility studies are used to inform the trial design and whether those that include a pilot or feasibility study recruit patients on time and within target.

Conclusions: the findings from this study will be important in the context of the adding value in research agenda. This is partly due to the lack of existing evidence on the role of pilot and feasibility studies.
1745-6215
Pek, Wei
bb2f78d3-78b2-4a9e-a65a-7bae5fbe6759
Ashton-Key, Martin
5994ca63-021e-44b1-86c4-b7ae53321101
Kirkpatrick, Emma
ef4472be-90bf-400a-b100-e9d26cb907fc
Young, Amanda
6bb7aa9c-776b-4bdd-be4e-cf67abd05652
Pek, Wei
bb2f78d3-78b2-4a9e-a65a-7bae5fbe6759
Ashton-Key, Martin
5994ca63-021e-44b1-86c4-b7ae53321101
Kirkpatrick, Emma
ef4472be-90bf-400a-b100-e9d26cb907fc
Young, Amanda
6bb7aa9c-776b-4bdd-be4e-cf67abd05652

Pek, Wei, Ashton-Key, Martin, Kirkpatrick, Emma and Young, Amanda (2015) Pilot and feasibility studies: what's the point? Trials, 16 (Supplement 2), [P22]. (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P22).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: the appropriateness of research design and methodology of clinical trials is paramount if we are to succeed in reducing the amount of waste in research. Pilot and feasibility studies serve an important role in determining the most appropriate design and whether the trial will succeed to completion.

Aims and objectives: the study will assess the role of pilot and feasibility studies in the design of clinical trials funded by the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme.

Method: there are three phases to the study: 1. Literature review, 2. Review of the ongoing HTA trial portfolio and, 3. Review of the HTA portfolio of published trials to determine the added value of the inclusion of a pilot or feasibility study. A list of HTA trials will be retrieved from three cohorts: completed standalone pilot or feasibility studies; completed and ongoing clinical trials which include an internal pilot or feasibility study; and successful applications in pre-contracting status in the HTA programme.

Results: the results of the study will still be in development. The number of included trials and proposed checklist/classification system will be presented to determine how pilot and feasibility studies are used to inform the trial design and whether those that include a pilot or feasibility study recruit patients on time and within target.

Conclusions: the findings from this study will be important in the context of the adding value in research agenda. This is partly due to the lack of existing evidence on the role of pilot and feasibility studies.

Text
1745-6215-16-S2-P22 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (292kB)

More information

Published date: 16 November 2015
Organisations: NETSCC

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 408150
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/408150
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: a076f79a-16bd-44e8-af73-0db8d4ba7b4a
ORCID for Emma Kirkpatrick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-1605
ORCID for Amanda Young: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-5561

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 May 2017 04:04
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Wei Pek
Author: Martin Ashton-Key
Author: Emma Kirkpatrick ORCID iD
Author: Amanda Young ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×