The utility of PRISMA for abstracts in two cohorts: a comparison of health technology assessment and Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2009-2014
The utility of PRISMA for abstracts in two cohorts: a comparison of health technology assessment and Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2009-2014
Kirkpatrick, Emma
ef4472be-90bf-400a-b100-e9d26cb907fc
Young, Amanda
7b8251fb-0eab-4681-a28e-cf54d260e825
Tier, Kathy
98f7b5e8-894f-41db-997d-88986235948f
Davidson, Peter
531fc501-2ab0-4481-900e-2e7c0cc6424d
Blatch-Jones, Amanda
6bb7aa9c-776b-4bdd-be4e-cf67abd05652
1 December 2015
Kirkpatrick, Emma
ef4472be-90bf-400a-b100-e9d26cb907fc
Young, Amanda
7b8251fb-0eab-4681-a28e-cf54d260e825
Tier, Kathy
98f7b5e8-894f-41db-997d-88986235948f
Davidson, Peter
531fc501-2ab0-4481-900e-2e7c0cc6424d
Blatch-Jones, Amanda
6bb7aa9c-776b-4bdd-be4e-cf67abd05652
Kirkpatrick, Emma, Young, Amanda, Tier, Kathy, Davidson, Peter and Blatch-Jones, Amanda
(2015)
The utility of PRISMA for abstracts in two cohorts: a comparison of health technology assessment and Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2009-2014.
Trials, 16 (S2).
(doi:10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P163).
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 December 2015
Organisations:
NETSCC
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 408154
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/408154
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 485054dd-a6bb-4956-9f35-21ab2429f5ad
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 May 2017 04:04
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:31
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Emma Kirkpatrick
Author:
Amanda Young
Author:
Kathy Tier
Author:
Peter Davidson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics