Tuning without over-tuning: parametric uncertainty quantification for the NEMO ocean model
Tuning without over-tuning: parametric uncertainty quantification for the NEMO ocean model
In this paper we discuss climate model tuning and present an iterative automatic tuning method from the statistical science literature. The method, which we refer to here as iterative refocussing (though also known as history matching), avoids many of the common pitfalls of automatic tuning procedures that are based on optimisation of a cost function, principally the over-tuning of a climate model due to using only partial observations. This avoidance comes by seeking to rule out parameter choices that we are confident could not reproduce the observations, rather than seeking the model that is closest to them (a procedure that risks over-tuning). We comment on the state of climate model tuning and illustrate our approach through three waves of iterative refocussing of the NEMO (Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean) ORCA2 global ocean model run at 2° resolution. We show how at certain depths the anomalies of global mean temperature and salinity in a standard configuration of the model exceeds 10 standard deviations away from observations and show the extent to which this can be alleviated by iterative refocussing without compromising model performance spatially. We show how model improvements can be achieved by simultaneously perturbing multiple parameters, and illustrate the potential of using low-resolution ensembles to tune NEMO ORCA configurations at higher resolutions.
1789-1816
Williamson, Daniel B.
2c3f8144-07b2-425d-85e0-d52dac36a278
Blaker, Adam T.
94efe8b2-c744-4e90-87d7-db19ffa41200
Sinha, Bablu
fbb0cf78-c13b-43e0-b0ae-735ca4d4cded
Williamson, Daniel B.
2c3f8144-07b2-425d-85e0-d52dac36a278
Blaker, Adam T.
94efe8b2-c744-4e90-87d7-db19ffa41200
Sinha, Bablu
fbb0cf78-c13b-43e0-b0ae-735ca4d4cded
Williamson, Daniel B., Blaker, Adam T. and Sinha, Bablu
(2017)
Tuning without over-tuning: parametric uncertainty quantification for the NEMO ocean model.
Geoscientific Model Development, 10 (4), .
(doi:10.5194/gmd-10-1789-2017).
Abstract
In this paper we discuss climate model tuning and present an iterative automatic tuning method from the statistical science literature. The method, which we refer to here as iterative refocussing (though also known as history matching), avoids many of the common pitfalls of automatic tuning procedures that are based on optimisation of a cost function, principally the over-tuning of a climate model due to using only partial observations. This avoidance comes by seeking to rule out parameter choices that we are confident could not reproduce the observations, rather than seeking the model that is closest to them (a procedure that risks over-tuning). We comment on the state of climate model tuning and illustrate our approach through three waves of iterative refocussing of the NEMO (Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean) ORCA2 global ocean model run at 2° resolution. We show how at certain depths the anomalies of global mean temperature and salinity in a standard configuration of the model exceeds 10 standard deviations away from observations and show the extent to which this can be alleviated by iterative refocussing without compromising model performance spatially. We show how model improvements can be achieved by simultaneously perturbing multiple parameters, and illustrate the potential of using low-resolution ensembles to tune NEMO ORCA configurations at higher resolutions.
Text
gmd-10-1789-2017
- Version of Record
Archive
gmd-10-1789-2017-supplement
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 30 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 April 2017
Organisations:
Marine Systems Modelling, National Oceanography Centre
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 408193
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/408193
ISSN: 1991-9603
PURE UUID: cc714b67-1dbe-46e9-9bb0-e9707ff8db92
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 May 2017 04:01
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 13:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Daniel B. Williamson
Author:
Adam T. Blaker
Author:
Bablu Sinha
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics