The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cinema Sound and the Loudness Issue: its Origins and Implications

Cinema Sound and the Loudness Issue: its Origins and Implications
Cinema Sound and the Loudness Issue: its Origins and Implications
For over five decades after the introduction of ‘talking movies’, the soundtracks of films were recorded in various types of analogue forms, such as variable-area optical film, variable-density optical film and magnetically-coated film. From the1920s to the early 1970s, the background noise (hiss) inherent in the recording processes limited the level to which the sound could be amplified before the noise became unpleasant and annoying. The cinemas, themselves, were often made from converted theatres, whose acoustics were designed more for reinforcing the voices of live actors, rather than for sound reproduction via loudspeakers. However, these limitations were usually taken into account by the film directors and sound mixers, who kept the soundtracks relatively simple. Actors also tended to deliver their dialogue with a semi-theatrical projection, and in most cases spoke clearly. Accompanying music and effects were usually interspersed with the dialogue, so each occurred in its own time.
Ever conscious of the need for the cinema audiences to follow the plots, soundtracks were almost universally mixed in theatres which were of reasonably similar size to the cinemas, and with similar amplifiers and loudspeakers. In this way, the mixers could hear during the post-production process a sound which was a reasonable representation of how the public would hear it in the less-than-optimal conditions of most cinemas. Various forms of standardised, high-frequency equalisation were also introduced, to aid in establishing a good balance between the capabilities of the loudspeaker systems, the noise from the recording media, and the intelligibility of the sounds. Nevertheless, other than for limited release formats in premier cinemas with expensive sound reproduction equipment, the general level of sound in the average cinemas was little more than ‘adequate’. Responding to this problem, in the early 1970s, Dolby Laboratories introduced their A-type noise reduction to cinema soundtracks, along with Dolby Stereo. The latter was a ‘4-2-4’ phase-matrixed system, allowing four channels of sound reproduction which could wrap around the audience, although without the accompanying noise-reduction system the noise level would have been unacceptable. In the 1980s Dolby improved the situation still further with the introduction of Dolby SR noise-reduction, but the system was still limited to the four, matrixed channels because there was no more room on a 35 mm film to add more tracks. The answer to delivering more channels in a compact form seemed to lie in the use of digital soundtracks.
104-120
Institute of Acoustics
Newell, Philip
d2f67626-8c98-4894-a64d-3bf0b5badbbc
Holland, Keith
90dd842b-e3c8-45bb-865e-3e7da77ec703
Newell, Julius
abeabf3d-8019-44b8-ab8a-28845cdbc736
Neskov, Branko
01ba4696-0c5a-430e-ae68-91649202ade3
Newell, Philip
d2f67626-8c98-4894-a64d-3bf0b5badbbc
Holland, Keith
90dd842b-e3c8-45bb-865e-3e7da77ec703
Newell, Julius
abeabf3d-8019-44b8-ab8a-28845cdbc736
Neskov, Branko
01ba4696-0c5a-430e-ae68-91649202ade3

Newell, Philip, Holland, Keith, Newell, Julius and Neskov, Branko (2016) Cinema Sound and the Loudness Issue: its Origins and Implications. In Reproduced Sound 2016: Sound with Pictures: Time is of the Essence. vol. 38, Institute of Acoustics. pp. 104-120 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

For over five decades after the introduction of ‘talking movies’, the soundtracks of films were recorded in various types of analogue forms, such as variable-area optical film, variable-density optical film and magnetically-coated film. From the1920s to the early 1970s, the background noise (hiss) inherent in the recording processes limited the level to which the sound could be amplified before the noise became unpleasant and annoying. The cinemas, themselves, were often made from converted theatres, whose acoustics were designed more for reinforcing the voices of live actors, rather than for sound reproduction via loudspeakers. However, these limitations were usually taken into account by the film directors and sound mixers, who kept the soundtracks relatively simple. Actors also tended to deliver their dialogue with a semi-theatrical projection, and in most cases spoke clearly. Accompanying music and effects were usually interspersed with the dialogue, so each occurred in its own time.
Ever conscious of the need for the cinema audiences to follow the plots, soundtracks were almost universally mixed in theatres which were of reasonably similar size to the cinemas, and with similar amplifiers and loudspeakers. In this way, the mixers could hear during the post-production process a sound which was a reasonable representation of how the public would hear it in the less-than-optimal conditions of most cinemas. Various forms of standardised, high-frequency equalisation were also introduced, to aid in establishing a good balance between the capabilities of the loudspeaker systems, the noise from the recording media, and the intelligibility of the sounds. Nevertheless, other than for limited release formats in premier cinemas with expensive sound reproduction equipment, the general level of sound in the average cinemas was little more than ‘adequate’. Responding to this problem, in the early 1970s, Dolby Laboratories introduced their A-type noise reduction to cinema soundtracks, along with Dolby Stereo. The latter was a ‘4-2-4’ phase-matrixed system, allowing four channels of sound reproduction which could wrap around the audience, although without the accompanying noise-reduction system the noise level would have been unacceptable. In the 1980s Dolby improved the situation still further with the introduction of Dolby SR noise-reduction, but the system was still limited to the four, matrixed channels because there was no more room on a 35 mm film to add more tracks. The answer to delivering more channels in a compact form seemed to lie in the use of digital soundtracks.

Text
PN_etal_RS2016 - Author's Original
Download (1MB)
Text
p12_Newell_etal - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 15 November 2016
Venue - Dates: Reproduced Sound 2016: Sound with Pictures: Time is of the Essence, Holiday Inn, Southampton, United Kingdom, 2016-11-15 - 2016-11-17
Organisations: Acoustics Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 408248
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/408248
PURE UUID: 9a2abbfe-bffe-4b92-bc7d-f53cd5355f41
ORCID for Keith Holland: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7439-2375

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 May 2017 04:01
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 13:43

Export record

Contributors

Author: Philip Newell
Author: Keith Holland ORCID iD
Author: Julius Newell
Author: Branko Neskov

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×