A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (ii) barriers to uptake of telehealthcare devices
A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (ii) barriers to uptake of telehealthcare devices
 
  Background: Monitoring health and care needs through the use of telehealthcare devices has been proposed to help alleviate funding concerns in a climate of limited budgets. As well as improving cost effectiveness, such an approach could be used to help individuals live at home for longer. In practice however, these devices often go unused. A qualitative study was carried out to determine the barriers to uptake of these devices from both the perspective of the end user and from key players in the healthcare supply chain.
Methods: A qualitative approach was used involving focus groups and interviews. Two UK-based focus groups were held with users and potential users, to assess their views on the wide array of devices available. 27 individuals were involved in the groups, all over the age of 60. Additionally 27 telephone interviews were conducted with key supply chain players to ascertain their views on the barriers to uptake of these devices. A semi-structured interview guide was used. All data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic approach.
Results: Users were generally unaware of the wide array of devices available and when shown a selection, were often unclear as to their purpose. The interviews revealed extensive barriers to uptake due to lack of awareness, unfamiliar terminology, complex supply routes and costs, resistance from professionals to device usage and lack of expertise.
Conclusions: Public and professional awareness campaigns are required with appropriate funding mechanisms for users to gain access to devices. The numerous barriers identified require systematically addressing, so that device usage is better promoted, enabling individuals to live at home successfully for longer.
  
  
  1-9
  
    
      Campling, Natasha C.
      
        0e0410b0-a9cd-486d-a51f-20d80df04791
      
     
  
    
      Pitts, David G.
      
        8a710354-8418-4743-9a47-0ebb75076e9b
      
     
  
    
      Knight, Paul V.
      
        9e600f24-dfec-458b-8cc5-cf0af3346c4a
      
     
  
    
      Aspinall, Richard
      
        9dfc205b-4a5b-4fdd-a576-deb1af753f4e
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
    
  
    
    
  
    
      6 July 2017
    
    
  
  
    
      Campling, Natasha C.
      
        0e0410b0-a9cd-486d-a51f-20d80df04791
      
     
  
    
      Pitts, David G.
      
        8a710354-8418-4743-9a47-0ebb75076e9b
      
     
  
    
      Knight, Paul V.
      
        9e600f24-dfec-458b-8cc5-cf0af3346c4a
      
     
  
    
      Aspinall, Richard
      
        9dfc205b-4a5b-4fdd-a576-deb1af753f4e
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Campling, Natasha C., Pitts, David G., Knight, Paul V. and Aspinall, Richard
  
  
  
  
   
    (2017)
  
  
    
    A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telehealthcare devices (ii) barriers to uptake of telehealthcare devices.
  
  
  
  
    BMC Health Services Research, 17, , [466].
  
   (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2270-8). 
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
    
      
        
          Abstract
          Background: Monitoring health and care needs through the use of telehealthcare devices has been proposed to help alleviate funding concerns in a climate of limited budgets. As well as improving cost effectiveness, such an approach could be used to help individuals live at home for longer. In practice however, these devices often go unused. A qualitative study was carried out to determine the barriers to uptake of these devices from both the perspective of the end user and from key players in the healthcare supply chain.
Methods: A qualitative approach was used involving focus groups and interviews. Two UK-based focus groups were held with users and potential users, to assess their views on the wide array of devices available. 27 individuals were involved in the groups, all over the age of 60. Additionally 27 telephone interviews were conducted with key supply chain players to ascertain their views on the barriers to uptake of these devices. A semi-structured interview guide was used. All data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic approach.
Results: Users were generally unaware of the wide array of devices available and when shown a selection, were often unclear as to their purpose. The interviews revealed extensive barriers to uptake due to lack of awareness, unfamiliar terminology, complex supply routes and costs, resistance from professionals to device usage and lack of expertise.
Conclusions: Public and professional awareness campaigns are required with appropriate funding mechanisms for users to gain access to devices. The numerous barriers identified require systematically addressing, so that device usage is better promoted, enabling individuals to live at home successfully for longer.
         
      
      
        
          
            
  
    Text
 A Qualitative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Telehealthcare Devices (ii) Barriers to Uptake of Telehealthcare Devices
     - Accepted Manuscript
   
  
  
    
  
 
          
            
          
            
           
            
           
        
          
            
  
    Text
 A qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of telephealthcare devices ii PUBLISHED
     - Version of Record
   
  
  
    
  
 
          
            
          
            
           
            
           
        
        
       
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Accepted/In Press date: 25 April 2017
 
    
      e-pub ahead of print date: 6 July 2017
 
    
      Published date: 6 July 2017
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
        Organisations:
        Researcher Development
      
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 408592
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/408592
        
          
        
        
        
          ISSN: 1472-6963
        
        
          PURE UUID: 5cbbf87f-79b1-4a87-93f6-bd4667d4bcda
        
  
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 25 May 2017 04:02
  Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:22
  Export record
  
  
   Altmetrics
   
   
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              David G. Pitts
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Paul V. Knight
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Richard Aspinall
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics