The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The impact loss to authors and research

The impact loss to authors and research
The impact loss to authors and research
The history of scientific communication is one of increasing access. The Gutenberg press allowed rapid and relatively inexpensive reproduction of the printed word. The advent of postal services allowed for the distribution of papers across countries and around the world by airmail.
Peer-reviewed journals created consistent collections of quality-controlled papers, distributed to a wider audience of subscribers. And, as the volume of journals increased, research libraries created collections of journals, catalogued, and made them accessible to patrons from the shelves. The web – and open access, OA – will allow anyone with an internet connection to access all the peer-reviewed literature anywhere, anytime. Increased accessibility of the peer-reviewed literature should allow that literature to have a greater impact on future research, which will improve the quality of that research.
Those who invest in and benefit from primary research, including the general public, have an interest in improvements to the quality of that research. The authors of the peer-reviewed literature also have an interest in increasing its impact, since that impact, as traditionally measured using citation counts, is a major element in the way their work is evaluated.
Without debating the merits of evaluation by citation counting, this does provide a measurable (potential) benefit for authors that provide OA to their research papers. If OA increases citation impact – due to a greater number of scientists being able to access the paper – that presents a strong self-interest argument to encourage authors to go OA. It also hints at the extent to which restrictive access policies negatively affect research and its potential impact on future work.
1843342030
Chandos Publishing
Kurtz, Michael
9343e244-6d4c-4e0f-9fbe-0b7c3fa936a8
Brody, Tim
153aca10-d72f-41d8-b704-684067e78cf0
Jacobs, Neil
Kurtz, Michael
9343e244-6d4c-4e0f-9fbe-0b7c3fa936a8
Brody, Tim
153aca10-d72f-41d8-b704-684067e78cf0
Jacobs, Neil

Kurtz, Michael and Brody, Tim (2006) The impact loss to authors and research In, Jacobs, Neil (eds.) Open Access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Oxford, UK, Chandos Publishing

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

The history of scientific communication is one of increasing access. The Gutenberg press allowed rapid and relatively inexpensive reproduction of the printed word. The advent of postal services allowed for the distribution of papers across countries and around the world by airmail.
Peer-reviewed journals created consistent collections of quality-controlled papers, distributed to a wider audience of subscribers. And, as the volume of journals increased, research libraries created collections of journals, catalogued, and made them accessible to patrons from the shelves. The web – and open access, OA – will allow anyone with an internet connection to access all the peer-reviewed literature anywhere, anytime. Increased accessibility of the peer-reviewed literature should allow that literature to have a greater impact on future research, which will improve the quality of that research.
Those who invest in and benefit from primary research, including the general public, have an interest in improvements to the quality of that research. The authors of the peer-reviewed literature also have an interest in increasing its impact, since that impact, as traditionally measured using citation counts, is a major element in the way their work is evaluated.
Without debating the merits of evaluation by citation counting, this does provide a measurable (potential) benefit for authors that provide OA to their research papers. If OA increases citation impact – due to a greater number of scientists being able to access the paper – that presents a strong self-interest argument to encourage authors to go OA. It also hints at the extent to which restrictive access policies negatively affect research and its potential impact on future work.

PDF chapter5distro.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (219kB)

More information

Published date: 17 July 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 40867
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40867
ISBN: 1843342030
PURE UUID: 57737eb6-c35c-4ba8-896b-0d68d266d988

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jul 2006
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 15:33

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×