The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository
Warning ePrints Soton is experiencing an issue with some file downloads not being available. We are working hard to fix this. Please bear with us.

Success factors for international HTA projects: evaluating EUnetHTA Joint Action as an exemplar

Success factors for international HTA projects: evaluating EUnetHTA Joint Action as an exemplar
Success factors for international HTA projects: evaluating EUnetHTA Joint Action as an exemplar

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation is essential for the management of international projects or networks in health technology assessment (HTA). It extends beyond the normal process of project management by incorporating qualitative dimensions and provides information about a project's effectiveness and achievements. This article aimed to identify the factors that are important for the success of international HTA projects. The European network for Health Technology Assessment Joint Action (EUnetHTA JA) is presented as an exemplar.

METHODS: METHODS for the evaluation of international HTA projects include interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, observations and documentary review, and the key points of these approaches have been summarized. The impact and effectiveness of the EUnetHTA JA was evaluated by questionnaires of project participants and external stakeholders, and by documentary review.

RESULTS: The response rate for the three annual questionnaires sent to project participants ranged from 86 percent to 88 percent and for external stakeholders ranged from 65 percent to 88 percent. Key factors for project success included production of deliverables according to the workplan, achievement of objectives, added value generated, effective communication, involvement of external stakeholders, workstream management and progress from the preceding EUnetHTA 2006-2008 project.

CONCLUSIONS: The experience of this project can inform the evaluation of future international HTA collaborations, such as the EUnetHTA 2nd Joint Action and HTAsiaLink. A high response rate was achieved to the self-completion questionnaires and the strategy followed is recommended for evaluation of international HTA projects. Future assessments of international HTA projects should strive to measure outcomes and impact, not just outputs and process.

Databases, Factual, Europe, Humans, International Cooperation, Program Evaluation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
0266-4623
544-51
Guegan, Eleanor Woodford
c1e11e35-e05b-484e-a206-bc3b6db546db
Cook, Andrew
ab9c7bb3-974a-4db9-b3c2-9942988005d5
Guegan, Eleanor Woodford
c1e11e35-e05b-484e-a206-bc3b6db546db
Cook, Andrew
ab9c7bb3-974a-4db9-b3c2-9942988005d5

Guegan, Eleanor Woodford and Cook, Andrew (2014) Success factors for international HTA projects: evaluating EUnetHTA Joint Action as an exemplar. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 30 (5), 544-51. (doi:10.1017/S0266462314000580).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation is essential for the management of international projects or networks in health technology assessment (HTA). It extends beyond the normal process of project management by incorporating qualitative dimensions and provides information about a project's effectiveness and achievements. This article aimed to identify the factors that are important for the success of international HTA projects. The European network for Health Technology Assessment Joint Action (EUnetHTA JA) is presented as an exemplar.

METHODS: METHODS for the evaluation of international HTA projects include interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, observations and documentary review, and the key points of these approaches have been summarized. The impact and effectiveness of the EUnetHTA JA was evaluated by questionnaires of project participants and external stakeholders, and by documentary review.

RESULTS: The response rate for the three annual questionnaires sent to project participants ranged from 86 percent to 88 percent and for external stakeholders ranged from 65 percent to 88 percent. Key factors for project success included production of deliverables according to the workplan, achievement of objectives, added value generated, effective communication, involvement of external stakeholders, workstream management and progress from the preceding EUnetHTA 2006-2008 project.

CONCLUSIONS: The experience of this project can inform the evaluation of future international HTA collaborations, such as the EUnetHTA 2nd Joint Action and HTAsiaLink. A high response rate was achieved to the self-completion questionnaires and the strategy followed is recommended for evaluation of international HTA projects. Future assessments of international HTA projects should strive to measure outcomes and impact, not just outputs and process.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2014
Keywords: Databases, Factual, Europe, Humans, International Cooperation, Program Evaluation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Organisations: NETSCC

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 409213
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/409213
ISSN: 0266-4623
PURE UUID: cff7ad5c-a4b8-4435-a802-daeba119190c
ORCID for Eleanor Woodford Guegan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7225-6249
ORCID for Andrew Cook: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6680-439X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 May 2017 04:07
Last modified: 10 Nov 2021 03:25

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Eleanor Woodford Guegan ORCID iD
Author: Andrew Cook ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×