This dataset is intended to be used in conjunction with the journal publication; "The effects of Hydration on the DC Breakdown Strength of Polyethylene Composites Employing Oxide and Nitride Fillers" Authors: I. L. Hosier, M. Praeger, A. S. Vaughan and S. G. Swingler to be published in IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation (accepted for publication 27th April 2017) The excel file contains the raw data used to generate each figure on a seperate tab. Abstract: Particle dispersion, water absorption/desorption and electrical breakdown behavior were studied in a range of polyethylene composites having a common matrix morphology. Three different conditioning routes (dry, ambient and wet) were used to vary the absorbed water content. Systems employing oxide fillers (silica and alumina) were found to have poor or intermediate levels of particle dispersion and could absorb/desorb significant amounts of water. Consequently, they required drying to provide breakdown strengths comparable to that of the host matrix. Systems based on calcined silica exhibited reduced water absorption and provided improved breakdown strength after ambient conditioning, despite having an identical dispersion to those utilizing untreated silica. Composites employing nitride fillers (silicon nitride and aluminum nitride) were found to have good or intermediate levels of particle dispersion. These absorbed far less water and hence provided breakdown strength values comparable to that of the host matrix following ambient conditioning. Their breakdown strength was degraded after wet conditioning with both exhibiting similar breakdown strengths despite there being a large difference in the level of particle dispersion between the two fillers. In composites based upon a hydrophobic host matrix, water absorption is largely determined by particle surface chemistry and, although the above results are presented in terms of water absorption, we suggest that changes in this characteristic can be interpreted as a proxy for changed surface chemistry. The results suggest that surface chemistry is at least as important as particle dispersion in determining the electrical breakdown strength.