The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

To replicate or not to replicate? Exploring reproducibility in economics through the lens of a model and a pilot study

To replicate or not to replicate? Exploring reproducibility in economics through the lens of a model and a pilot study
To replicate or not to replicate? Exploring reproducibility in economics through the lens of a model and a pilot study
The sciences are in an era of an alleged ‘credibility crisis.’ In this study, we discuss the reproducibility of received empirical results, focusing on economics research. By combining theory and empirical evidence, we discuss the import of replication studies, and whether they improve our confidence in novel findings. The theory sheds light on the importance of replications, even when replications themselves are subject to research biases. We then report data from a pilot meta-study of replication in the subfield of experimental economics, which serves as a positive benchmark for investigating the credibility of economics. Our meta-study highlights certain difficulties when applying meta-research and systematizing the economics literature.
0013-0133
F209-F235
Maniadis, Zacharias
70ffa309-94c9-487c-982f-778294ea2a13
Tufano, Fabio
d6d913fd-25eb-4195-a832-f1ec5b6fc6c9
List, John
64b929c2-04dd-46df-bd9e-738c6fd325a4
Maniadis, Zacharias
70ffa309-94c9-487c-982f-778294ea2a13
Tufano, Fabio
d6d913fd-25eb-4195-a832-f1ec5b6fc6c9
List, John
64b929c2-04dd-46df-bd9e-738c6fd325a4

Maniadis, Zacharias, Tufano, Fabio and List, John (2017) To replicate or not to replicate? Exploring reproducibility in economics through the lens of a model and a pilot study. The Economic Journal, 127 (605), F209-F235. (doi:10.1111/ecoj.12527).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The sciences are in an era of an alleged ‘credibility crisis.’ In this study, we discuss the reproducibility of received empirical results, focusing on economics research. By combining theory and empirical evidence, we discuss the import of replication studies, and whether they improve our confidence in novel findings. The theory sheds light on the importance of replications, even when replications themselves are subject to research biases. We then report data from a pilot meta-study of replication in the subfield of experimental economics, which serves as a positive benchmark for investigating the credibility of economics. Our meta-study highlights certain difficulties when applying meta-research and systematizing the economics literature.

Text
To Replicate or Not To Replicate - Accepted Manuscript
Download (627kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 March 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 October 2017
Published date: October 2017
Organisations: Economics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 410391
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/410391
ISSN: 0013-0133
PURE UUID: 23702d4d-9529-49f8-b3d1-6b156af55480
ORCID for Zacharias Maniadis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3225-0835

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jun 2017 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Fabio Tufano
Author: John List

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×