Change in angiogram-derived management strategy of patients with chest pain when some FFR data are available: how consistent is the effect?
Change in angiogram-derived management strategy of patients with chest pain when some FFR data are available: how consistent is the effect?
Background
The assessment of patients presenting with angina using invasive angiography alone is imperfect. By contrast, fractional flow reserve (FFR) allows for assessment of lesion-specific ischemia, which is predictive of clinical outcome. A series of studies has demonstrated that the availability of FFR data at the time of diagnostic angiography leads to significant differences in the management of those patients.
Hypothesis: The objective of this paper is to describe assess the consistency in the difference in management resulting from an FFR-directed versus and angiogram-directed strategy in appropriate observational and randomized trials.
Methods
A methodical search was made using MEDLINE, Current Contents Connect, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane library, PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science.
Results
Eight studies were identified using the eligibility criteria. A total of 2468 patients were recommended to have optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone after initial angiographic assessment but, after FFR results were available, a total of 716 (29.0%) were referred for revascularization (PCI 626 patients [25.36%]; CABG 90 patients [3.64%]). Similarly, 3766 patients were originally committed to PCI after initial angiography: of these 1454 patients (38.61%) were reconsidered to be suitable for OMT alone and 71 individuals (1.8%) were deemed suitable for CABG after FFR data were available. Further, of 366 patients referred for CABG based on angiographic data, the availability of FFR data changed the final decision to OMT alone in 65 patients (17.76%) and PCI in 51 patients (13.9%). Overall, the angiogram-derived management was changed in 22%–48% of these study populations when FFR data were available.
Conclusions
Some use of FFR during coronary angiography alters the angiogram-directed management in a remarkably consistent manner. These data suggest that routine use of FFR at the diagnostic angiogram would improve patient care.
Mahmoudi, Michael
f6a55246-399e-4f81-944e-a4b169786e8a
Curzen, Nicholas
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Nagaraja, Vinayak
fe8a6557-9710-489a-9658-0a1f8818b9c8
Mamas, Mamas
41515b72-75ff-4922-bb9f-8f9c63f9f5af
Rogers, Campbell
30ecce2e-9a3e-4e7f-9280-8511a5865eda
Mahmoudi, Michael
f6a55246-399e-4f81-944e-a4b169786e8a
Curzen, Nicholas
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Nagaraja, Vinayak
fe8a6557-9710-489a-9658-0a1f8818b9c8
Mamas, Mamas
41515b72-75ff-4922-bb9f-8f9c63f9f5af
Rogers, Campbell
30ecce2e-9a3e-4e7f-9280-8511a5865eda
Mahmoudi, Michael, Curzen, Nicholas, Nagaraja, Vinayak, Mamas, Mamas and Rogers, Campbell
(2017)
Change in angiogram-derived management strategy of patients with chest pain when some FFR data are available: how consistent is the effect?
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine.
(doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2017.01.014).
Abstract
Background
The assessment of patients presenting with angina using invasive angiography alone is imperfect. By contrast, fractional flow reserve (FFR) allows for assessment of lesion-specific ischemia, which is predictive of clinical outcome. A series of studies has demonstrated that the availability of FFR data at the time of diagnostic angiography leads to significant differences in the management of those patients.
Hypothesis: The objective of this paper is to describe assess the consistency in the difference in management resulting from an FFR-directed versus and angiogram-directed strategy in appropriate observational and randomized trials.
Methods
A methodical search was made using MEDLINE, Current Contents Connect, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane library, PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science.
Results
Eight studies were identified using the eligibility criteria. A total of 2468 patients were recommended to have optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone after initial angiographic assessment but, after FFR results were available, a total of 716 (29.0%) were referred for revascularization (PCI 626 patients [25.36%]; CABG 90 patients [3.64%]). Similarly, 3766 patients were originally committed to PCI after initial angiography: of these 1454 patients (38.61%) were reconsidered to be suitable for OMT alone and 71 individuals (1.8%) were deemed suitable for CABG after FFR data were available. Further, of 366 patients referred for CABG based on angiographic data, the availability of FFR data changed the final decision to OMT alone in 65 patients (17.76%) and PCI in 51 patients (13.9%). Overall, the angiogram-derived management was changed in 22%–48% of these study populations when FFR data were available.
Conclusions
Some use of FFR during coronary angiography alters the angiogram-directed management in a remarkably consistent manner. These data suggest that routine use of FFR at the diagnostic angiogram would improve patient care.
Text
Change in Angiogram ...
- Version of Record
Restricted to Registered users only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 April 2017
Organisations:
Human Development & Health
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 410538
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/410538
ISSN: 1553-8389
PURE UUID: 3ca80b0d-36bc-4cde-a856-a360f554cfaa
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Jun 2017 09:03
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:24
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Vinayak Nagaraja
Author:
Mamas Mamas
Author:
Campbell Rogers
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics