The audibility of comb-filtering due to perforated cinema screens
The audibility of comb-filtering due to perforated cinema screens
In cinema audio, the sound needs to be combined to try and create an atmosphere in which the visual and audio images work in conjunction with each other to help engage the viewers. The loudspeakers positioned behind the cinema screen are integral in creating a localized image that matches the positions of the video sources. This means that current cinema screens need to be optimized for both image reflection and sound transmission. Placing the loudspeakers above or below the screen results in a less satisfactory experience with other attendant problems [1]. Because placing the loudspeakers behind a normal, non-perforated, screen would give rise to large amounts of attenuation at high frequencies, perforated screens have been developed to “let the sound through”. Currently no material exists that has the qualities required for both perfect reflection of light and perfect transmission of sound. This means that trade-offs need to be made to enable a screen to meet the requirements of both the reflection of light and transmission sound at acceptable level. For years, the quality of the image has dominated cinema specifications, partly due to the fact that early films did not include particularly high quality sound. However, the arrival of digital soundtracks, and as the science of psycho-acoustics has become better understood, the realization that audio quality is greatly important for the overall realism of the cinema experience has led to more research into improving the sound whilst trying to maintain the high definition required for the projection of a high-quality image on to a large screen. The presence of the screen gives rise to a phenomenon known as ‘comb filtering’,arising from the addition of delayed versions of an original signal to itself. The severity of the comb-filtering will vary depending on the geometric setup of the system. In particular, varying the distance between the loudspeaker and the cinema screen can change the nature of the comb filtering that the system exhibits. This, in turn, will alter the frequency content of the final signal reaching the listener, and it is this final signal that is essential to the cinema experience. This paper focuses on characterizing the actual audibility of a comb-filtered signal by means of signal processing. The cinema screen’s acoustic properties are used to create a model that simulates the effect of playing a sound through the loudspeaker/screen system. The audibility or otherwise of the comb-filtering is then assessed via a subjective listening test.
104-111
Elliott, David
39970a0b-5732-41d9-acf8-6886af2d10ed
Holland, Keith
90dd842b-e3c8-45bb-865e-3e7da77ec703
Newell, Philip
d2f67626-8c98-4894-a64d-3bf0b5badbbc
15 October 2014
Elliott, David
39970a0b-5732-41d9-acf8-6886af2d10ed
Holland, Keith
90dd842b-e3c8-45bb-865e-3e7da77ec703
Newell, Philip
d2f67626-8c98-4894-a64d-3bf0b5badbbc
Elliott, David, Holland, Keith and Newell, Philip
(2014)
The audibility of comb-filtering due to perforated cinema screens.
In Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics: Reproduced Sound 2014.
vol. 36,
Institute of Acoustics.
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
In cinema audio, the sound needs to be combined to try and create an atmosphere in which the visual and audio images work in conjunction with each other to help engage the viewers. The loudspeakers positioned behind the cinema screen are integral in creating a localized image that matches the positions of the video sources. This means that current cinema screens need to be optimized for both image reflection and sound transmission. Placing the loudspeakers above or below the screen results in a less satisfactory experience with other attendant problems [1]. Because placing the loudspeakers behind a normal, non-perforated, screen would give rise to large amounts of attenuation at high frequencies, perforated screens have been developed to “let the sound through”. Currently no material exists that has the qualities required for both perfect reflection of light and perfect transmission of sound. This means that trade-offs need to be made to enable a screen to meet the requirements of both the reflection of light and transmission sound at acceptable level. For years, the quality of the image has dominated cinema specifications, partly due to the fact that early films did not include particularly high quality sound. However, the arrival of digital soundtracks, and as the science of psycho-acoustics has become better understood, the realization that audio quality is greatly important for the overall realism of the cinema experience has led to more research into improving the sound whilst trying to maintain the high definition required for the projection of a high-quality image on to a large screen. The presence of the screen gives rise to a phenomenon known as ‘comb filtering’,arising from the addition of delayed versions of an original signal to itself. The severity of the comb-filtering will vary depending on the geometric setup of the system. In particular, varying the distance between the loudspeaker and the cinema screen can change the nature of the comb filtering that the system exhibits. This, in turn, will alter the frequency content of the final signal reaching the listener, and it is this final signal that is essential to the cinema experience. This paper focuses on characterizing the actual audibility of a comb-filtered signal by means of signal processing. The cinema screen’s acoustic properties are used to create a model that simulates the effect of playing a sound through the loudspeaker/screen system. The audibility or otherwise of the comb-filtering is then assessed via a subjective listening test.
Text
DE KH PN 2014
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 15 October 2014
Venue - Dates:
Institute of Acoustics - Reproduced Sound 2014, 2014-10-14 - 2014-10-15
Organisations:
Acoustics Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 410639
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/410639
PURE UUID: a3341079-b1be-4efe-8d44-e8d6828aa184
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Jun 2017 09:17
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 13:43
Export record
Contributors
Author:
David Elliott
Author:
Keith Holland
Author:
Philip Newell
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics