The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

COAST (Cisplatin Ototoxicity Attenuated by Aspirin Trial): A phase II double blind, randomised controlled trial to establish if aspirin reduces cisplatin induced hearing loss

COAST (Cisplatin Ototoxicity Attenuated by Aspirin Trial): A phase II double blind, randomised controlled trial to establish if aspirin reduces cisplatin induced hearing loss
COAST (Cisplatin Ototoxicity Attenuated by Aspirin Trial): A phase II double blind, randomised controlled trial to establish if aspirin reduces cisplatin induced hearing loss
Background
Cisplatin has the highest ototoxic potential of platinum containing drugs leaving 50% of patients with a permanent and irreversible hearing-loss, and associated reduction in quality of life. There are no preventative treatment strategies to minimise this common side-effect. Both cisplatin and gentamicin are thought to damage hearing through a common mechanism involving reactive oxygen species in the inner ear. Aspirin has been shown to minimise gentamicin induced ototoxicity. We tested the hypothesis that aspirin could reduce ototoxicity from cisplatin based chemotherapy.

Method
94 patients were recruited into a phase II, double blind, placebo controlled, 2-arm trial, and randomised 1:1 from multiple tumour-sites (head and neck, thoracic, bladder, germ cell) in the U.K. Patients underwent pure tone audiometry (PTA) before, and following their final cisplatin dose at 7 and 90 days. Patients received aspirin 975mg tid and omeprazole 20 mg od, or placebos; from the day before, to 2 days after their cisplatin dose, for each cisplatin cycle. The primary endpoint was total hearing difference, comparing pre- and post-cisplatin PTA at 6 and 8kHz in both ears.

Results
Although aspirin was well-tolerated, it did not protect protect hearing in patients receiving cisplatin [mean difference 9.38 60% CI (-1.45, 20.22) one sided p-value of 0.233 in favour of placebo 71% (56/79) patients demonstrated hearing loss following cisplatin administration (median loss of 35db IQR 0-90 range -85 to 180, mean 42.4 SD 56.3). The extent of hearing-loss was not associated with cisplatin dose, age or hearing loss at presentation. Patients undergoing treatment for head and neck malignancy experienced the biggest hearing loss.

Conclusion
Aspirin was well-tolerated but did not protect hearing suggesting that cisplatin and gentamicin may have distinct ototoxic mechanisms or that cisplatin is more ototoxic, requiring larger protective doses. Cisplatin induced ototoxicity results in significant morbidity and further research is required to prevent it.
King, Emma
d85e0e8f-7295-4912-9052-646a790d99db
Crabb, Simon
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Martin, Karen
0de5a0ff-bb29-4cbd-890d-169cc0d7c032
Abab, Julia
b4176948-e6e7-4cd0-9237-4260e9f9ec50
Ratcliffe, Ian
0688ee1f-37ac-42ee-8238-fc3e9ea5bb68
Thornton, Roger
bb12fe74-105a-457b-9a87-c5cc9f7f7df7
Lineton, Ben
1ace4e96-34da-4fc4-bc17-a1d82b2ba0e2
Ellis, Mary
f9c39516-e078-4d80-807b-9ab91890df41
Moody, Ron
f9b85481-50ac-473d-9b7d-d58807e7a939
Stanton, Louise
8b827763-d839-4b4b-bbf2-358a84110294
Geldart, Tom
3c886da9-aa50-4f75-8e90-5a91626aeef9
Bayne, Mike
f20fcb02-8b09-44b1-ae71-ab8952f38cdc
Davies, Joe
ea6ba3d1-e489-4e57-9e9c-babd095c48d6
Lamb, Carolynn
0bb41a77-1290-42e9-8bf9-b50c8fb2d4fa
Popat, Sanjay
10c354ba-52df-4cc8-8f46-7994dc241a0a
Nutting, Christopher
1315fdb5-545b-4e12-b4f1-c1e4ca3e96d1
Chester, John
c055dcc5-6b69-42e7-a61f-d5043bd3e69b
Hartley, John
b1561fb1-9e52-412a-8d2c-e981288357dd
Thomas, Gareth
2ff54aa9-a766-416b-91ee-cf1c5be74106
Ottensmeier, Christian
42b8a398-baac-4843-a3d6-056225675797
Huddart, Robert
9b98e268-407a-4dc5-85de-884cadb943a7
Pugh, Keith
a14fa7e7-f8f8-4c4d-b15d-3aa2b007f80a
King, Emma
d85e0e8f-7295-4912-9052-646a790d99db
Crabb, Simon
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Martin, Karen
0de5a0ff-bb29-4cbd-890d-169cc0d7c032
Abab, Julia
b4176948-e6e7-4cd0-9237-4260e9f9ec50
Ratcliffe, Ian
0688ee1f-37ac-42ee-8238-fc3e9ea5bb68
Thornton, Roger
bb12fe74-105a-457b-9a87-c5cc9f7f7df7
Lineton, Ben
1ace4e96-34da-4fc4-bc17-a1d82b2ba0e2
Ellis, Mary
f9c39516-e078-4d80-807b-9ab91890df41
Moody, Ron
f9b85481-50ac-473d-9b7d-d58807e7a939
Stanton, Louise
8b827763-d839-4b4b-bbf2-358a84110294
Geldart, Tom
3c886da9-aa50-4f75-8e90-5a91626aeef9
Bayne, Mike
f20fcb02-8b09-44b1-ae71-ab8952f38cdc
Davies, Joe
ea6ba3d1-e489-4e57-9e9c-babd095c48d6
Lamb, Carolynn
0bb41a77-1290-42e9-8bf9-b50c8fb2d4fa
Popat, Sanjay
10c354ba-52df-4cc8-8f46-7994dc241a0a
Nutting, Christopher
1315fdb5-545b-4e12-b4f1-c1e4ca3e96d1
Chester, John
c055dcc5-6b69-42e7-a61f-d5043bd3e69b
Hartley, John
b1561fb1-9e52-412a-8d2c-e981288357dd
Thomas, Gareth
2ff54aa9-a766-416b-91ee-cf1c5be74106
Ottensmeier, Christian
42b8a398-baac-4843-a3d6-056225675797
Huddart, Robert
9b98e268-407a-4dc5-85de-884cadb943a7
Pugh, Keith
a14fa7e7-f8f8-4c4d-b15d-3aa2b007f80a

King, Emma, Crabb, Simon, Martin, Karen, Abab, Julia, Ratcliffe, Ian, Thornton, Roger, Lineton, Ben, Ellis, Mary, Moody, Ron, Stanton, Louise, Geldart, Tom, Bayne, Mike, Davies, Joe, Lamb, Carolynn, Popat, Sanjay, Nutting, Christopher, Chester, John, Hartley, John, Thomas, Gareth, Ottensmeier, Christian, Huddart, Robert and Pugh, Keith (2016) COAST (Cisplatin Ototoxicity Attenuated by Aspirin Trial): A phase II double blind, randomised controlled trial to establish if aspirin reduces cisplatin induced hearing loss. NCRI Cancer Conference, , Liverpool, United Kingdom. 06 - 09 Nov 2016. 1 pp .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)

Abstract

Background
Cisplatin has the highest ototoxic potential of platinum containing drugs leaving 50% of patients with a permanent and irreversible hearing-loss, and associated reduction in quality of life. There are no preventative treatment strategies to minimise this common side-effect. Both cisplatin and gentamicin are thought to damage hearing through a common mechanism involving reactive oxygen species in the inner ear. Aspirin has been shown to minimise gentamicin induced ototoxicity. We tested the hypothesis that aspirin could reduce ototoxicity from cisplatin based chemotherapy.

Method
94 patients were recruited into a phase II, double blind, placebo controlled, 2-arm trial, and randomised 1:1 from multiple tumour-sites (head and neck, thoracic, bladder, germ cell) in the U.K. Patients underwent pure tone audiometry (PTA) before, and following their final cisplatin dose at 7 and 90 days. Patients received aspirin 975mg tid and omeprazole 20 mg od, or placebos; from the day before, to 2 days after their cisplatin dose, for each cisplatin cycle. The primary endpoint was total hearing difference, comparing pre- and post-cisplatin PTA at 6 and 8kHz in both ears.

Results
Although aspirin was well-tolerated, it did not protect protect hearing in patients receiving cisplatin [mean difference 9.38 60% CI (-1.45, 20.22) one sided p-value of 0.233 in favour of placebo 71% (56/79) patients demonstrated hearing loss following cisplatin administration (median loss of 35db IQR 0-90 range -85 to 180, mean 42.4 SD 56.3). The extent of hearing-loss was not associated with cisplatin dose, age or hearing loss at presentation. Patients undergoing treatment for head and neck malignancy experienced the biggest hearing loss.

Conclusion
Aspirin was well-tolerated but did not protect hearing suggesting that cisplatin and gentamicin may have distinct ototoxic mechanisms or that cisplatin is more ototoxic, requiring larger protective doses. Cisplatin induced ototoxicity results in significant morbidity and further research is required to prevent it.

Text
NCRI_2016_Cancer Conference abstracts - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 October 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 November 2016
Published date: 6 November 2016
Venue - Dates: NCRI Cancer Conference, , Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2016-11-06 - 2016-11-09
Organisations: Human Sciences Group, Cancer Sciences, Clinical Informatics Research Unit

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 410819
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/410819
PURE UUID: f3352e42-1242-4812-aaaf-31c8b9063ffc
ORCID for Simon Crabb: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-9064
ORCID for Karen Martin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-0501
ORCID for Julia Abab: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5292-1042
ORCID for Ben Lineton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4784-7762
ORCID for Louise Stanton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8181-840X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Jun 2017 09:41
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:08

Export record

Contributors

Author: Emma King
Author: Simon Crabb ORCID iD
Author: Karen Martin ORCID iD
Author: Julia Abab ORCID iD
Author: Ian Ratcliffe
Author: Roger Thornton
Author: Ben Lineton ORCID iD
Author: Mary Ellis
Author: Ron Moody
Author: Louise Stanton ORCID iD
Author: Tom Geldart
Author: Mike Bayne
Author: Joe Davies
Author: Carolynn Lamb
Author: Sanjay Popat
Author: Christopher Nutting
Author: John Chester
Author: John Hartley
Author: Gareth Thomas
Author: Robert Huddart
Author: Keith Pugh

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×