In defense of common sense in entrepreneurship theory: Beyond philosophical extremities and linguistic abuses
In defense of common sense in entrepreneurship theory: Beyond philosophical extremities and linguistic abuses
Whether entrepreneurial opportunities are discovered or created is a long-standing dilemma in the study of entrepreneurship. In our recent article (Ramoglou & Tsang, 2016), we framed this dilemma as false. Opportunities are neither discovered nor created. They are objectively existing propensities to be creatively actualized. Central to our analysis has been the ontological rectification of the mode of existence of opportunities. Whereas opportunities are systematically mistreated as actualized entities triggering successful entrepreneurial action when empirically discovered, we clarified that they exist as the non-actualized market conditions making possible the emergence of desirable outcomes. The actualization framework endeavors to bring conceptual clarity and order in a discourse characterized by growing confusion. Alvarez, Barney, McBride and Wuebker (2017), Berglund and Korsgaard (2017), and Foss and Klein (2017) take issue with several parts of our framework. The comments provide us a valuable opportunity to further advance the discourse into the very intellectual foundation of entrepreneurship theory. We refute critiques, caution against the philosophical extremities of empiricist and idealist assumptions, and debunk “opportunity creation” as a philosophically and linguistically problematic approach. We show that the actualization approach embraces common sense and is free from the fatal flaws associated with the discovery and creation approaches.
Entrepreneurial opportunities, Ontology/epistemology, Economic theory, Philosophy of science, Critical realism
736-744
Ramoglou, Stratos
f3fffbf5-0f1f-46e1-93af-a13e18945610
Tsang, Eric W.K.
7a965ee3-064f-46d8-8ffe-66e73bc07a9b
Ramoglou, Stratos
f3fffbf5-0f1f-46e1-93af-a13e18945610
Tsang, Eric W.K.
7a965ee3-064f-46d8-8ffe-66e73bc07a9b
Ramoglou, Stratos and Tsang, Eric W.K.
(2017)
In defense of common sense in entrepreneurship theory: Beyond philosophical extremities and linguistic abuses.
Academy of Management Review, 42 (4), .
(doi:10.5465/amr.2017.0169).
Abstract
Whether entrepreneurial opportunities are discovered or created is a long-standing dilemma in the study of entrepreneurship. In our recent article (Ramoglou & Tsang, 2016), we framed this dilemma as false. Opportunities are neither discovered nor created. They are objectively existing propensities to be creatively actualized. Central to our analysis has been the ontological rectification of the mode of existence of opportunities. Whereas opportunities are systematically mistreated as actualized entities triggering successful entrepreneurial action when empirically discovered, we clarified that they exist as the non-actualized market conditions making possible the emergence of desirable outcomes. The actualization framework endeavors to bring conceptual clarity and order in a discourse characterized by growing confusion. Alvarez, Barney, McBride and Wuebker (2017), Berglund and Korsgaard (2017), and Foss and Klein (2017) take issue with several parts of our framework. The comments provide us a valuable opportunity to further advance the discourse into the very intellectual foundation of entrepreneurship theory. We refute critiques, caution against the philosophical extremities of empiricist and idealist assumptions, and debunk “opportunity creation” as a philosophically and linguistically problematic approach. We show that the actualization approach embraces common sense and is free from the fatal flaws associated with the discovery and creation approaches.
Text
amr.2017.0169.1.full
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 March 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 March 2017
Keywords:
Entrepreneurial opportunities, Ontology/epistemology, Economic theory, Philosophy of science, Critical realism
Organisations:
Strategy, Innovation & Entrepreneurship
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 410831
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/410831
ISSN: 0363-7425
PURE UUID: 9bcf0cfa-eeef-4d19-9db5-b98bf7d23fc0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Jun 2017 09:44
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 04:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Eric W.K. Tsang
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
Loading...
View more statistics