The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the short form-36 health survey: findings from the women’s health study of Accra, Ghana

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the short form-36 health survey: findings from the women’s health study of Accra, Ghana
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the short form-36 health survey: findings from the women’s health study of Accra, Ghana
Measuring the health status of individuals or a population is an important first step in the assessment of health care needs and the evaluation of the impact of health interventions. Reliable population-wide statistics on the health status are scarce especially in developing countries including Ghana. This paper assesses the validity and reliability of a standard instrument widely used in high income countries, the Short Form-36, as a tool to evaluate health status among women age 20 years and older in urban Ghana. The study draws on a representative sample of 2’814 respondents from the Women’s Health Study of Accra. We used multi-trait, multi-item matrix methods, Cronbach’s alpha estimates, half-split reliability tests and principal component analysis to evaluate the validity of SF-36 in the Ghanaian context. The response rate and the rate of completion for each health domain was over 97%. Item-level validation satisfied the rigorous psychometric criteria for internal consistency and reliability was above the suggested 0.40 criterion for all SF-36 scoring items apart from one item under Vitality sub-scale. The normed SF-36 scores showed wide variability and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.70). Following simple orthogonal rotation two principal components were identified and interpreted as Physical and Mental health components, identical to those found in other study settings. These components accounted for 62.6% of the reliable variance in scale scores across the study population. The absence of strong correlations between the various eight SF-36 sub-scales, demonstrate that each scale measures a distinct concept of health. The study provides evidence that SF-36 is suitable for the assessment of health status among women in Accra and, by extension, suitable for assessment of the health status of women in urban areas of Ghana. Key words Introduction Reliable, objective
Physical and Mental health; Short-Form 36 (SF-36); validity; reliability; adult females;
2034-9378
7-29
Hill, Allan
5b17aa71-0c14-4fbf-8bc9-807c8294d4ae
Frempong-Ainguah, Faustina
5a44b2be-4ee7-4f07-b9de-955a0c9bddfc
Hill, Allan
5b17aa71-0c14-4fbf-8bc9-807c8294d4ae
Frempong-Ainguah, Faustina
5a44b2be-4ee7-4f07-b9de-955a0c9bddfc

Hill, Allan and Frempong-Ainguah, Faustina (2014) Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the short form-36 health survey: findings from the women’s health study of Accra, Ghana. Revue Quetelet/Quetelet Journal, 2 (2), 7-29, [DOI : 10.14428/rqj2014.02.02.01]. (doi:10.14428/rqj2014.02.02.01).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Measuring the health status of individuals or a population is an important first step in the assessment of health care needs and the evaluation of the impact of health interventions. Reliable population-wide statistics on the health status are scarce especially in developing countries including Ghana. This paper assesses the validity and reliability of a standard instrument widely used in high income countries, the Short Form-36, as a tool to evaluate health status among women age 20 years and older in urban Ghana. The study draws on a representative sample of 2’814 respondents from the Women’s Health Study of Accra. We used multi-trait, multi-item matrix methods, Cronbach’s alpha estimates, half-split reliability tests and principal component analysis to evaluate the validity of SF-36 in the Ghanaian context. The response rate and the rate of completion for each health domain was over 97%. Item-level validation satisfied the rigorous psychometric criteria for internal consistency and reliability was above the suggested 0.40 criterion for all SF-36 scoring items apart from one item under Vitality sub-scale. The normed SF-36 scores showed wide variability and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.70). Following simple orthogonal rotation two principal components were identified and interpreted as Physical and Mental health components, identical to those found in other study settings. These components accounted for 62.6% of the reliable variance in scale scores across the study population. The absence of strong correlations between the various eight SF-36 sub-scales, demonstrate that each scale measures a distinct concept of health. The study provides evidence that SF-36 is suitable for the assessment of health status among women in Accra and, by extension, suitable for assessment of the health status of women in urban areas of Ghana. Key words Introduction Reliable, objective

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 October 2014
Keywords: Physical and Mental health; Short-Form 36 (SF-36); validity; reliability; adult females;
Organisations: Social Statistics & Demography

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 410841
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/410841
ISSN: 2034-9378
PURE UUID: fae07209-409c-46b7-87be-b3c6b52f8cc6
ORCID for Allan Hill: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-0379

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Jun 2017 09:44
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Allan Hill ORCID iD
Author: Faustina Frempong-Ainguah

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×