The enemy within? : Armenians, Jews, the Military Crises of 1915 and the Genocidal Origins of the 'Minorities Question
The enemy within? : Armenians, Jews, the Military Crises of 1915 and the Genocidal Origins of the 'Minorities Question
This chapter identifies two simultaneous First World War military crises, the one Ottoman, the other Russian, with major consequences in the way post-war nation-states began “seeing” minorities and resorting to genocidal action against them. Russian Jews and Ottoman Armenians were largely held responsible for the near-military disasters of 1915 in each case leading to mass communal deportations. While genocide was avoided in the former case, realised in the latter, both sequences acted as “military” models for how “new” states might eliminate unwanted groups through ethnic cleansing. While an alarmed international community responded with a 1919 commitment to minorities’ protection this same community’s imprimatur to mass compulsory population exchange at the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne rather suggests a post-war acceptance of programmes of violent state homogenisation.
143-173
Levene, Mark
4ad83ded-d4b9-40eb-a795-b2382a9a296a
2017
Levene, Mark
4ad83ded-d4b9-40eb-a795-b2382a9a296a
Levene, Mark
(2017)
The enemy within? : Armenians, Jews, the Military Crises of 1915 and the Genocidal Origins of the 'Minorities Question.
In,
Ewence, Hannah and Grady, Tim
(eds.)
Minorities and the First World War: From War to Peace.
Palgrave Macmillan, .
(doi:10.1057/978-1-137-53975-5_6).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
This chapter identifies two simultaneous First World War military crises, the one Ottoman, the other Russian, with major consequences in the way post-war nation-states began “seeing” minorities and resorting to genocidal action against them. Russian Jews and Ottoman Armenians were largely held responsible for the near-military disasters of 1915 in each case leading to mass communal deportations. While genocide was avoided in the former case, realised in the latter, both sequences acted as “military” models for how “new” states might eliminate unwanted groups through ethnic cleansing. While an alarmed international community responded with a 1919 commitment to minorities’ protection this same community’s imprimatur to mass compulsory population exchange at the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne rather suggests a post-war acceptance of programmes of violent state homogenisation.
Text
da1888c8-8046-47ae-bbdb-474183af6ef7
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 31 July 2017
Published date: 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 412119
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/412119
PURE UUID: da1888c8-8046-47ae-bbdb-474183af6ef7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jul 2017 16:31
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 15:12
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Editor:
Hannah Ewence
Editor:
Tim Grady
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics