Predicting AKI in emergency admissions: an external validation study of the acute kidney injury prediction score (APS)
Predicting AKI in emergency admissions: an external validation study of the acute kidney injury prediction score (APS)
Objectives Hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (HA-AKI) is associated with a high risk of mortality. Prediction models or rules may identify those most at risk of HA-AKI. This study externally validated one of the few clinical prediction rules (CPRs) derived in a general medicine cohort using clinical information and data from an acute hospitals electronic system on admission: the acute kidney injury prediction score (APS).
Design, setting and participants External validation in a single UK non-specialist acute hospital (2013–2015, 12 554 episodes); four cohorts: adult medical and general surgical populations, with and without a known preadmission baseline serum creatinine (SCr).
Methods Performance assessed by discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCROC) and calibration.
Results HA-AKI incidence within 7 days (kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) change in SCr) was 8.1% (n=409) of medical patients with known baseline SCr, 6.6% (n=141) in those without a baseline, 4.9% (n=204) in surgical patients with baseline and 4% (n=49) in those without. Across the four cohorts AUCROC were: medical with known baseline 0.65 (95% CIs 0.62 to 0.67) and no baseline 0.71 (0.67 to 0.75), surgical with baseline 0.66 (0.62 to 0.70) and no baseline 0.68 (0.58 to 0.75). For calibration, in medicine and surgical cohorts with baseline SCr, Hosmer-Lemeshow p values were non-significant, suggesting acceptable calibration. In the medical cohort, at a cut-off of five points on the APS to predict HA-AKI, positive predictive value was 16% (13–18%) and negative predictive value 94% (93–94%). Of medical patients with HA-AKI, those with an APS ≥5 had a significantly increased risk of death (28% vs 18%, OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.9), p=0.015).
Conclusions On external validation the APS on admission shows moderate discrimination and acceptable calibration to predict HA-AKI and may be useful as a severity marker when HA-AKI occurs. Harnessing linked data from primary care may be one way to achieve more accurate risk prediction.
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Hodgson, Luke Eliot
202f8157-7783-471c-b629-3f1451b2e442
Dimitrov, Borislav
366d715f-ffd9-45a1-8415-65de5488472f
Venn, Richard
adc24ece-fb8d-4c1e-969b-026ca62db4ec
Forni, Lui G.
e9ca402c-ea28-4d1a-8c4f-7fbaf205bad8
8 March 2017
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Hodgson, Luke Eliot
202f8157-7783-471c-b629-3f1451b2e442
Dimitrov, Borislav
366d715f-ffd9-45a1-8415-65de5488472f
Venn, Richard
adc24ece-fb8d-4c1e-969b-026ca62db4ec
Forni, Lui G.
e9ca402c-ea28-4d1a-8c4f-7fbaf205bad8
Roderick, Paul, Hodgson, Luke Eliot, Dimitrov, Borislav, Venn, Richard and Forni, Lui G.
(2017)
Predicting AKI in emergency admissions: an external validation study of the acute kidney injury prediction score (APS).
BMJ Open, 7 (3).
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013511).
Abstract
Objectives Hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (HA-AKI) is associated with a high risk of mortality. Prediction models or rules may identify those most at risk of HA-AKI. This study externally validated one of the few clinical prediction rules (CPRs) derived in a general medicine cohort using clinical information and data from an acute hospitals electronic system on admission: the acute kidney injury prediction score (APS).
Design, setting and participants External validation in a single UK non-specialist acute hospital (2013–2015, 12 554 episodes); four cohorts: adult medical and general surgical populations, with and without a known preadmission baseline serum creatinine (SCr).
Methods Performance assessed by discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCROC) and calibration.
Results HA-AKI incidence within 7 days (kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) change in SCr) was 8.1% (n=409) of medical patients with known baseline SCr, 6.6% (n=141) in those without a baseline, 4.9% (n=204) in surgical patients with baseline and 4% (n=49) in those without. Across the four cohorts AUCROC were: medical with known baseline 0.65 (95% CIs 0.62 to 0.67) and no baseline 0.71 (0.67 to 0.75), surgical with baseline 0.66 (0.62 to 0.70) and no baseline 0.68 (0.58 to 0.75). For calibration, in medicine and surgical cohorts with baseline SCr, Hosmer-Lemeshow p values were non-significant, suggesting acceptable calibration. In the medical cohort, at a cut-off of five points on the APS to predict HA-AKI, positive predictive value was 16% (13–18%) and negative predictive value 94% (93–94%). Of medical patients with HA-AKI, those with an APS ≥5 had a significantly increased risk of death (28% vs 18%, OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.9), p=0.015).
Conclusions On external validation the APS on admission shows moderate discrimination and acceptable calibration to predict HA-AKI and may be useful as a severity marker when HA-AKI occurs. Harnessing linked data from primary care may be one way to achieve more accurate risk prediction.
Text
e013511.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 31 December 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 March 2017
Published date: 8 March 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 412449
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/412449
PURE UUID: e4f0ebf8-6221-496a-96db-35c68061862c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Jul 2017 13:47
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Luke Eliot Hodgson
Author:
Borislav Dimitrov
Author:
Richard Venn
Author:
Lui G. Forni
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics