The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of using AB words to assess candidacy in adults

Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of using AB words to assess candidacy in adults
Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of using AB words to assess candidacy in adults
Background: Adult cochlear implant (CI) candidacy is assessed in part by the use of speech perception measures. In the United Kingdom the current cut-off point to fall within the CI candidacy range is a score of less than 50% on the BKB sentences presented in quiet (presented at 70 dBSPL).

Goal: The specific goal of this article was to review the benefit of adding the AB word test to the assessment test battery for candidacy.

Results: The AB word test scores showed good sensitivity and specificity when calculated based on both word and phoneme scores. The word score equivalent for 50% correct on the BKB sentences was 18.5% and it was 34.5% when the phoneme score was calculated; these scores are in line with those used in
centres in Wales (15% AB word score).

Conclusion: The goal of the British Cochlear Implant Group (BCIG) service evaluation was to determine if the pre-implant assessment measures are appropriate and set at the correct level for determining candidacy, the
future analyses will determine whether the speech perception cut-off point for candidacy should be adjusted and whether other more challenging measures should be used in the candidacy evaluation.
1467-0100
17-21
Vickers, Deborah
23453636-1d93-4fbf-9f01-00e85ea7c71c
Riley, Alison
b373fec0-b4cc-4766-9dc0-81eace32a26e
Ricaud, Rebecca
10178121-be67-48f5-ac24-50da07574d33
Verschuur, Carl
5e15ee1c-3a44-4dbe-ad43-ec3b50111e41
Cooper, Stacey
42917aea-bf71-4e6c-a938-d5c14e5566ea
Nunn, Terry
6a9acd41-40f4-4ab0-b144-92fefa9ebf84
Webb, Kath
f64f3de9-7f00-4e70-b0a4-c618d39448ac
Muff, Joanne
b9df7c06-52e2-412d-b6c2-6e65cef2e655
Harris, Frances
f6cb3168-fe8b-437f-abb6-867eb21e7c31
Chung, Mark
b9b48fcd-215a-49ab-9c35-9ac2a82976f4
Humphries, Jane
e63d0c2c-7550-4c68-ae02-a75c9b51432c
Langshaw, Alison
fd286fe7-e3fa-4480-94ec-7ff0187db22b
Poynter-Smith, Emma
bda5c6a5-64a2-40da-9fbd-809158437602
Totten, Catherine
962f325c-62f2-4e32-a4cb-71706839fa9c
Tapper, Lynne
efd3fd12-ccfd-4c32-a3fb-f73c514afd1d
Ridgwell, Jillian
b8b10d70-8f61-420c-b0ff-b27ccff622d2
Mawman, Deborah
910f439e-1bca-4fab-833f-747630f11e2b
Martinez de Estibariz, Unai
f2c93527-07a1-40cb-a34f-a47abdce59a6
O'Driscoll, Martin
84cb2cca-f10a-47a6-92b7-5c041f70c5e8
George, Nicola
8e0a44c6-d462-4375-b0e5-a18f358a7b39
Pinto, Francesca
08336825-7ad6-4557-8082-06bc927e1561
Hall, Anne
800ecf5b-9dfb-4ad2-abfe-9e7a25e90166
Llewellyn, Carol
16d62d11-8ee4-4ab1-a42d-9fad3ef42dbd
Miah, Razun
b93e2b85-a6d6-4ee5-8e14-e22cf0823ae1
Al Malky, Ghada
a96ac71e-9208-45fd-a447-43a2036cad70
Kitterick, Padraig T.
00129ece-ead6-4230-bf83-b158171f053c
Vickers, Deborah
23453636-1d93-4fbf-9f01-00e85ea7c71c
Riley, Alison
b373fec0-b4cc-4766-9dc0-81eace32a26e
Ricaud, Rebecca
10178121-be67-48f5-ac24-50da07574d33
Verschuur, Carl
5e15ee1c-3a44-4dbe-ad43-ec3b50111e41
Cooper, Stacey
42917aea-bf71-4e6c-a938-d5c14e5566ea
Nunn, Terry
6a9acd41-40f4-4ab0-b144-92fefa9ebf84
Webb, Kath
f64f3de9-7f00-4e70-b0a4-c618d39448ac
Muff, Joanne
b9df7c06-52e2-412d-b6c2-6e65cef2e655
Harris, Frances
f6cb3168-fe8b-437f-abb6-867eb21e7c31
Chung, Mark
b9b48fcd-215a-49ab-9c35-9ac2a82976f4
Humphries, Jane
e63d0c2c-7550-4c68-ae02-a75c9b51432c
Langshaw, Alison
fd286fe7-e3fa-4480-94ec-7ff0187db22b
Poynter-Smith, Emma
bda5c6a5-64a2-40da-9fbd-809158437602
Totten, Catherine
962f325c-62f2-4e32-a4cb-71706839fa9c
Tapper, Lynne
efd3fd12-ccfd-4c32-a3fb-f73c514afd1d
Ridgwell, Jillian
b8b10d70-8f61-420c-b0ff-b27ccff622d2
Mawman, Deborah
910f439e-1bca-4fab-833f-747630f11e2b
Martinez de Estibariz, Unai
f2c93527-07a1-40cb-a34f-a47abdce59a6
O'Driscoll, Martin
84cb2cca-f10a-47a6-92b7-5c041f70c5e8
George, Nicola
8e0a44c6-d462-4375-b0e5-a18f358a7b39
Pinto, Francesca
08336825-7ad6-4557-8082-06bc927e1561
Hall, Anne
800ecf5b-9dfb-4ad2-abfe-9e7a25e90166
Llewellyn, Carol
16d62d11-8ee4-4ab1-a42d-9fad3ef42dbd
Miah, Razun
b93e2b85-a6d6-4ee5-8e14-e22cf0823ae1
Al Malky, Ghada
a96ac71e-9208-45fd-a447-43a2036cad70
Kitterick, Padraig T.
00129ece-ead6-4230-bf83-b158171f053c

Vickers, Deborah, Riley, Alison, Ricaud, Rebecca, Verschuur, Carl, Cooper, Stacey, Nunn, Terry, Webb, Kath, Muff, Joanne, Harris, Frances, Chung, Mark, Humphries, Jane, Langshaw, Alison, Poynter-Smith, Emma, Totten, Catherine, Tapper, Lynne, Ridgwell, Jillian, Mawman, Deborah, Martinez de Estibariz, Unai, O'Driscoll, Martin, George, Nicola, Pinto, Francesca, Hall, Anne, Llewellyn, Carol, Miah, Razun, Al Malky, Ghada and Kitterick, Padraig T. (2016) Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of using AB words to assess candidacy in adults. Cochlear Implants International, 17 (S1), 17-21. (doi:10.1080/14670100.2016.1161143).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Adult cochlear implant (CI) candidacy is assessed in part by the use of speech perception measures. In the United Kingdom the current cut-off point to fall within the CI candidacy range is a score of less than 50% on the BKB sentences presented in quiet (presented at 70 dBSPL).

Goal: The specific goal of this article was to review the benefit of adding the AB word test to the assessment test battery for candidacy.

Results: The AB word test scores showed good sensitivity and specificity when calculated based on both word and phoneme scores. The word score equivalent for 50% correct on the BKB sentences was 18.5% and it was 34.5% when the phoneme score was calculated; these scores are in line with those used in
centres in Wales (15% AB word score).

Conclusion: The goal of the British Cochlear Implant Group (BCIG) service evaluation was to determine if the pre-implant assessment measures are appropriate and set at the correct level for determining candidacy, the
future analyses will determine whether the speech perception cut-off point for candidacy should be adjusted and whether other more challenging measures should be used in the candidacy evaluation.

Text
Vickers 2016 Assessment using AB words - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 March 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 April 2016
Published date: 21 April 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 412516
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/412516
ISSN: 1467-0100
PURE UUID: 4ae0cb96-f113-4d31-a19f-f55b8ce71ac9

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jul 2017 14:03
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 12:24

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Deborah Vickers
Author: Alison Riley
Author: Rebecca Ricaud
Author: Carl Verschuur
Author: Stacey Cooper
Author: Terry Nunn
Author: Kath Webb
Author: Joanne Muff
Author: Frances Harris
Author: Mark Chung
Author: Jane Humphries
Author: Alison Langshaw
Author: Emma Poynter-Smith
Author: Catherine Totten
Author: Lynne Tapper
Author: Jillian Ridgwell
Author: Deborah Mawman
Author: Unai Martinez de Estibariz
Author: Martin O'Driscoll
Author: Nicola George
Author: Francesca Pinto
Author: Anne Hall
Author: Carol Llewellyn
Author: Razun Miah
Author: Ghada Al Malky
Author: Padraig T. Kitterick

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×