The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach

Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach
Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach
Background
This paper proposes a refocusing of consent for clinical genetic testing, moving away from an emphasis on autonomy and information provision, towards an emphasis on the virtues of healthcare professionals seeking consent, and the relationships they construct with their patients.

Methods
We draw on focus groups with UK healthcare professionals working in the field of clinical genetics, as well as in-depth interviews with patients who have sought genetic testing in the UK’s National Health Service (data collected 2013–2015). We explore two aspects of consent: first, how healthcare professionals consider the act of ‘consenting’ patients; and second how these professional accounts, along with the accounts of patients, deepen our understanding of the consent process.

Results
Our findings suggest that while healthcare professionals working in genetic medicine put much effort into ensuring patients’ understanding about their impending genetic test, they acknowledge, and we show, that patients can still leave genetic consultations relatively uninformed. Moreover, we show how placing emphasis on the informational aspect of genetic testing is not always reflective of, or valuable to, patients’ decision-making. Rather, decision-making is socially contextualised – also based on factors outside of information provision.

Conclusions
A more collaborative on-going consent process, grounded in virtue ethics and values of honesty, openness and trustworthiness, is proposed.
1472-6939
Samuel, Gabrielle
66af6213-08de-4c0e-92c1-12083ec456e3
Dheensa, Sandeep
d7d7e2bb-8def-4fad-9e1d-33d8141a0c9c
Farsides, Bobbie
91ee245a-9670-4024-94f4-53af12a3c42f
Fenwick, Angela
95a1f4fa-7f6f-4c07-a93b-9ea39c231c31
Lucassen, Anneke
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5
Samuel, Gabrielle
66af6213-08de-4c0e-92c1-12083ec456e3
Dheensa, Sandeep
d7d7e2bb-8def-4fad-9e1d-33d8141a0c9c
Farsides, Bobbie
91ee245a-9670-4024-94f4-53af12a3c42f
Fenwick, Angela
95a1f4fa-7f6f-4c07-a93b-9ea39c231c31
Lucassen, Anneke
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5

Samuel, Gabrielle, Dheensa, Sandeep, Farsides, Bobbie, Fenwick, Angela and Lucassen, Anneke (2017) Healthcare professionals’ and patients’ perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach. BMC Medical Ethics, 18, [47]. (doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0207-8).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
This paper proposes a refocusing of consent for clinical genetic testing, moving away from an emphasis on autonomy and information provision, towards an emphasis on the virtues of healthcare professionals seeking consent, and the relationships they construct with their patients.

Methods
We draw on focus groups with UK healthcare professionals working in the field of clinical genetics, as well as in-depth interviews with patients who have sought genetic testing in the UK’s National Health Service (data collected 2013–2015). We explore two aspects of consent: first, how healthcare professionals consider the act of ‘consenting’ patients; and second how these professional accounts, along with the accounts of patients, deepen our understanding of the consent process.

Results
Our findings suggest that while healthcare professionals working in genetic medicine put much effort into ensuring patients’ understanding about their impending genetic test, they acknowledge, and we show, that patients can still leave genetic consultations relatively uninformed. Moreover, we show how placing emphasis on the informational aspect of genetic testing is not always reflective of, or valuable to, patients’ decision-making. Rather, decision-making is socially contextualised – also based on factors outside of information provision.

Conclusions
A more collaborative on-going consent process, grounded in virtue ethics and values of honesty, openness and trustworthiness, is proposed.

Text
METH-D-16-00111_R3 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)
Text
document2459 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (472kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 July 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 August 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 412607
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/412607
ISSN: 1472-6939
PURE UUID: aeaf524c-065b-451c-a3c4-cb18d493d55e
ORCID for Anneke Lucassen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-4338

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jul 2017 16:32
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sandeep Dheensa
Author: Bobbie Farsides
Author: Angela Fenwick
Author: Anneke Lucassen ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×