The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Phase III, double-blind, randomized trial that compared maintenance lapatinib versus placebo after first-line chemotherapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 1/2-positive metastatic bladder cancer

Phase III, double-blind, randomized trial that compared maintenance lapatinib versus placebo after first-line chemotherapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 1/2-positive metastatic bladder cancer
Phase III, double-blind, randomized trial that compared maintenance lapatinib versus placebo after first-line chemotherapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 1/2-positive metastatic bladder cancer

Purpose: To establish whether maintenance lapatinib after first-line chemotherapy is beneficial in human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 1/HER2-positive metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (UBC).

Methods: Patients with metastatic UBC were screened centrally for HER1/HER2 overexpression. Patients who screened positive for HER1/2 and who did not have progressive disease during chemotherapy (four to eight cycles) were randomly assigned one to one to lapatinib or placebo after completion of first-line/initial chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: Between 2007 and 2013, 446 patients with UBC were screened, and 232 with HER1- or HER2-positive disease were randomly assigned. The median PFS for lapatinib and placebo was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.8 to 5.4) and 5.1 (95% CI, 3.0 to 5.8) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.43; P = .63). The overall survival for lapatinib and placebo was 12.6 (95% CI, 9.0 to 16.2) and 12.0 (95% CI, 10.5 to 14.9) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.31; P = .80). Discontinuation due to adverse events were similar in both arms (6% lapatinib and 5% placebo). The rate of grade 3 to 4 adverse events for lapatinib and placebo was 8.6% versus 8.1% ( P = .82). Preplanned subset analysis of patients strongly positive for HER1/HER2 (3+ on immunohistochemistry; n = 111), patients positive for only HER1 (n = 102), and patients positive for only HER2 (n = 42) showed no significant benefit with lapatinib in terms of PFS and overall survival ( P > .05 for each).

Conclusion This trial did not find significant improvements in outcome by the addition of maintenance lapatinib to standard of care.

Journal Article
1527-7755
48-55
Powles, Thomas
55539b87-1c5e-45ae-9e07-5b2232c2236c
Huddart, Robert A.
4491c174-99e7-4cfe-a5c2-845be33405dc
Elliott, Tony
494b0d76-db11-4ef0-bbdb-bd023794726a
Sarker, Shah-Jalal
5f0c81f3-6c2a-4b1c-a976-640baeee914c
Ackerman, Charlotte
d6720ccb-9499-47ba-bd46-8ad647d8a170
Jones, Robert
c8f8587e-d585-4177-bc9c-730c2e14a432
Hussain, Syed
04946d73-9bda-446a-8fd1-fc98c63e9eed
Crabb, Simon
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Jagdev, Satinder
a5fcb618-852f-4a09-96b0-c7afb5582163
Chester, John
c055dcc5-6b69-42e7-a61f-d5043bd3e69b
Hilman, Serena
93a63b88-ece7-4a08-8503-2d6273ea78dd
Beresford, Mark
6651ff9c-e960-46e1-b050-b97382cc24ad
Macdonald, Graham
875f03a2-b26c-4f00-a4e7-c94cd9aa85ec
Santhanam, Sundar
486f9253-baa3-4b95-a588-4f1fc6040529
Frew, John A.
53f58b0c-b0df-43a0-bc4e-d03488833525
Stockdale, Andrew
141839be-7557-4d51-abc6-a2ad79af1978
Hughes, Simon
d6203578-75f1-4c14-ac9f-c3cea0f2bad9
Berney, Daniel
54e0a217-b04f-4c5b-930c-62b0580f6ae3
Chowdhury, Simon
74cdad3c-31c9-4c77-9f24-e87debb9139e
Powles, Thomas
55539b87-1c5e-45ae-9e07-5b2232c2236c
Huddart, Robert A.
4491c174-99e7-4cfe-a5c2-845be33405dc
Elliott, Tony
494b0d76-db11-4ef0-bbdb-bd023794726a
Sarker, Shah-Jalal
5f0c81f3-6c2a-4b1c-a976-640baeee914c
Ackerman, Charlotte
d6720ccb-9499-47ba-bd46-8ad647d8a170
Jones, Robert
c8f8587e-d585-4177-bc9c-730c2e14a432
Hussain, Syed
04946d73-9bda-446a-8fd1-fc98c63e9eed
Crabb, Simon
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Jagdev, Satinder
a5fcb618-852f-4a09-96b0-c7afb5582163
Chester, John
c055dcc5-6b69-42e7-a61f-d5043bd3e69b
Hilman, Serena
93a63b88-ece7-4a08-8503-2d6273ea78dd
Beresford, Mark
6651ff9c-e960-46e1-b050-b97382cc24ad
Macdonald, Graham
875f03a2-b26c-4f00-a4e7-c94cd9aa85ec
Santhanam, Sundar
486f9253-baa3-4b95-a588-4f1fc6040529
Frew, John A.
53f58b0c-b0df-43a0-bc4e-d03488833525
Stockdale, Andrew
141839be-7557-4d51-abc6-a2ad79af1978
Hughes, Simon
d6203578-75f1-4c14-ac9f-c3cea0f2bad9
Berney, Daniel
54e0a217-b04f-4c5b-930c-62b0580f6ae3
Chowdhury, Simon
74cdad3c-31c9-4c77-9f24-e87debb9139e

Powles, Thomas, Huddart, Robert A., Elliott, Tony, Sarker, Shah-Jalal, Ackerman, Charlotte, Jones, Robert, Hussain, Syed, Crabb, Simon, Jagdev, Satinder, Chester, John, Hilman, Serena, Beresford, Mark, Macdonald, Graham, Santhanam, Sundar, Frew, John A., Stockdale, Andrew, Hughes, Simon, Berney, Daniel and Chowdhury, Simon (2017) Phase III, double-blind, randomized trial that compared maintenance lapatinib versus placebo after first-line chemotherapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 1/2-positive metastatic bladder cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35 (1), 48-55. (doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.66.3468).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: To establish whether maintenance lapatinib after first-line chemotherapy is beneficial in human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 1/HER2-positive metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (UBC).

Methods: Patients with metastatic UBC were screened centrally for HER1/HER2 overexpression. Patients who screened positive for HER1/2 and who did not have progressive disease during chemotherapy (four to eight cycles) were randomly assigned one to one to lapatinib or placebo after completion of first-line/initial chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: Between 2007 and 2013, 446 patients with UBC were screened, and 232 with HER1- or HER2-positive disease were randomly assigned. The median PFS for lapatinib and placebo was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.8 to 5.4) and 5.1 (95% CI, 3.0 to 5.8) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.43; P = .63). The overall survival for lapatinib and placebo was 12.6 (95% CI, 9.0 to 16.2) and 12.0 (95% CI, 10.5 to 14.9) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.31; P = .80). Discontinuation due to adverse events were similar in both arms (6% lapatinib and 5% placebo). The rate of grade 3 to 4 adverse events for lapatinib and placebo was 8.6% versus 8.1% ( P = .82). Preplanned subset analysis of patients strongly positive for HER1/HER2 (3+ on immunohistochemistry; n = 111), patients positive for only HER1 (n = 102), and patients positive for only HER2 (n = 42) showed no significant benefit with lapatinib in terms of PFS and overall survival ( P > .05 for each).

Conclusion This trial did not find significant improvements in outcome by the addition of maintenance lapatinib to standard of care.

Text
JCO.2015.66 - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (947kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 April 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 31 October 2016
Published date: 1 January 2017
Keywords: Journal Article

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 412846
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/412846
ISSN: 1527-7755
PURE UUID: a71fccb7-993c-4ab5-867d-54bd8cbd3132
ORCID for Simon Crabb: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-9064

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Aug 2017 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thomas Powles
Author: Robert A. Huddart
Author: Tony Elliott
Author: Shah-Jalal Sarker
Author: Charlotte Ackerman
Author: Robert Jones
Author: Syed Hussain
Author: Simon Crabb ORCID iD
Author: Satinder Jagdev
Author: John Chester
Author: Serena Hilman
Author: Mark Beresford
Author: Graham Macdonald
Author: Sundar Santhanam
Author: John A. Frew
Author: Andrew Stockdale
Author: Simon Hughes
Author: Daniel Berney
Author: Simon Chowdhury

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×