The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Valence and competence

Valence and competence
Valence and competence
‘Valence’ refers broadly to performance and competence. In its most simple form, a voter makes a valence-based vote choice when they make a choice based upon the performance of a party or candidate. This can be contrasted with positional voting, when a voter makes a choice based on a preferred policy goal, with identity-based voting – such as a choice based on class, ethnicity, religion or gender, or when a voter makes a choice consistent with their pre-existing party attachment – their partisanship. But the simplest definition of valence voting hides a variety of different definitions, operationalizations and debates, precisely because this general definition opens up the potential for a myriad of interpretations, and those different interpretations lead to competing claims based on different tests and assumptions. This is not to say that the concept of valence is not useful and important. Valence voting increasingly represents one of the most popular explanations for electoral choice, and with good reason, as we will show. But with this increasing popularity comes a need for common concepts and measurement and for new strides in a field characterized by strong literatures which do not always speak the same language. This chapter highlights insights from the valence field as well as the problems in the many uses of the concept of valence. It seeks to offer syntheses, solutions and new directions.
Valence, elections, competence, Voting
538-560
SAGE Publications
Green, Jane
cff6cee4-a008-4a79-ad4f-bab7f80ff1fd
Jennings, William
2ab3f11c-eb7f-44c6-9ef2-3180c1a954f7
Arzheimer, Kai
Evans, Jocelyn
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.
Green, Jane
cff6cee4-a008-4a79-ad4f-bab7f80ff1fd
Jennings, William
2ab3f11c-eb7f-44c6-9ef2-3180c1a954f7
Arzheimer, Kai
Evans, Jocelyn
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.

Green, Jane and Jennings, William (2017) Valence and competence. In, Arzheimer, Kai, Evans, Jocelyn and Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Electoral Behaviour. SAGE Publications, pp. 538-560.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

‘Valence’ refers broadly to performance and competence. In its most simple form, a voter makes a valence-based vote choice when they make a choice based upon the performance of a party or candidate. This can be contrasted with positional voting, when a voter makes a choice based on a preferred policy goal, with identity-based voting – such as a choice based on class, ethnicity, religion or gender, or when a voter makes a choice consistent with their pre-existing party attachment – their partisanship. But the simplest definition of valence voting hides a variety of different definitions, operationalizations and debates, precisely because this general definition opens up the potential for a myriad of interpretations, and those different interpretations lead to competing claims based on different tests and assumptions. This is not to say that the concept of valence is not useful and important. Valence voting increasingly represents one of the most popular explanations for electoral choice, and with good reason, as we will show. But with this increasing popularity comes a need for common concepts and measurement and for new strides in a field characterized by strong literatures which do not always speak the same language. This chapter highlights insights from the valence field as well as the problems in the many uses of the concept of valence. It seeks to offer syntheses, solutions and new directions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: May 2017
Keywords: Valence, elections, competence, Voting

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 412860
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/412860
PURE UUID: f9afb233-2175-4fa1-a1d8-2f383008c612
ORCID for William Jennings: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9007-8896

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Aug 2017 16:30
Last modified: 12 Dec 2021 03:53

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jane Green
Editor: Kai Arzheimer
Editor: Jocelyn Evans
Editor: Michael S. Lewis-Beck

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×