The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sex differences in jealousy in response to infidelity: Evaluation of demographic moderators in a national random sample

Sex differences in jealousy in response to infidelity: Evaluation of demographic moderators in a national random sample
Sex differences in jealousy in response to infidelity: Evaluation of demographic moderators in a national random sample

Studies examining sex differences in jealousy have often relied on student samples and were restricted to the evaluation of a selected few moderators. In this study, a nationally representative survey of American households was presented with either an actual or a hypothetical infidelity scenario (which appeared as either a forced choice or as continuous measures). Significant sex differences only emerged for forced choice measures and not for continuous measures. Importantly, this effect appeared most strongly in participants reporting reactions to an actual infidelity. We also explored a number of potential moderators of this effect. These moderators were more influential for the hypothetical than for the actual infidelity scenario. Exploratory analysis of additional demographic variables was conducted.

Infidelity, Jealousy, Moderators, Sex differences
0191-8869
47-51
Zengel, Bettina
9d343ec9-7b10-45e3-b818-41287d9c4bd5
Edlund, John E.
d1afb90a-dc0c-4ace-a374-c3bbbb755483
Sagarin, Brad J.
66e322be-de6b-49f1-9a0c-6f7ba1406d32
Zengel, Bettina
9d343ec9-7b10-45e3-b818-41287d9c4bd5
Edlund, John E.
d1afb90a-dc0c-4ace-a374-c3bbbb755483
Sagarin, Brad J.
66e322be-de6b-49f1-9a0c-6f7ba1406d32

Zengel, Bettina, Edlund, John E. and Sagarin, Brad J. (2013) Sex differences in jealousy in response to infidelity: Evaluation of demographic moderators in a national random sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 54 (1), 47-51. (doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Studies examining sex differences in jealousy have often relied on student samples and were restricted to the evaluation of a selected few moderators. In this study, a nationally representative survey of American households was presented with either an actual or a hypothetical infidelity scenario (which appeared as either a forced choice or as continuous measures). Significant sex differences only emerged for forced choice measures and not for continuous measures. Importantly, this effect appeared most strongly in participants reporting reactions to an actual infidelity. We also explored a number of potential moderators of this effect. These moderators were more influential for the hypothetical than for the actual infidelity scenario. Exploratory analysis of additional demographic variables was conducted.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 August 2012
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 September 2012
Published date: January 2013
Keywords: Infidelity, Jealousy, Moderators, Sex differences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 413076
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413076
ISSN: 0191-8869
PURE UUID: 628d0bcb-11b8-423b-bd3f-356daadb282a
ORCID for Bettina Zengel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0871-3158

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Aug 2017 16:31
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 12:26

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Bettina Zengel ORCID iD
Author: John E. Edlund
Author: Brad J. Sagarin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×