The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Researchers need access to NHS data for effective redesign of clinical pathways

Researchers need access to NHS data for effective redesign of clinical pathways
Researchers need access to NHS data for effective redesign of clinical pathways
Sood and colleagues argue for clinical informatics leaders in NHS organisations to accelerate the development of digitally enhanced models of care.1 We think that safe and effective redesign of clinical pathways and better use of health data requires not just digital leadership but also academic involvement.

Researchers are needed to generate and publish robust evidence on the benefits and harms of digitally enhanced service models. Rigorous analyses of healthcare databases require knowledge of frontline services and expertise in data science and statistics, which are best provided by a team with safe and accountable access to data. Without early involvement of researchers in the design of pathways, results can be wrong, and care can be misdirected or harmful. Despite warnings about the potential harms of risk stratification,2 such practice continues, directed by algorithms, untouched by frontline clinicians, and mostly unevaluated by researchers.

Academic researchers are currently held back from contributing to clinical redesign by unreasonable obstacles to data access. NHS England has streamlined data access for local authorities and commissioners,34 but researchers are left behind, jumping through the hoops of data applications, while witnessing shortcomings in the design and evaluation of new services.

Simultaneously, a minority of NHS data releases5 go to commercial companies that perform analytics for multiple clients, including NHS bodies. These users have few incentives or resources to document and publish how data are being used, let alone share their algorithms and build a knowledge base of methods and expertise. The risk is that patients, clinicians, and service providers might not be aware of, let alone be able to explain, how healthcare data are changing care. Without wider and more timely use of health data for research, the social contract with patients—to use health data for public benefit—risks being undermined.
Letter
0959-8138
j3787
Gilbert, Ruth
52d0021a-1ed2-4021-a11a-b3a344095a6e
Dutey-Magni, Peter
f2713e93-3179-4f7d-82cd-dcd415f1d06c
Gilbert, Ruth
52d0021a-1ed2-4021-a11a-b3a344095a6e
Dutey-Magni, Peter
f2713e93-3179-4f7d-82cd-dcd415f1d06c

Gilbert, Ruth and Dutey-Magni, Peter (2017) Researchers need access to NHS data for effective redesign of clinical pathways. BMJ, 358, j3787. (doi:10.1136/bmj.j3787).

Record type: Letter

Abstract

Sood and colleagues argue for clinical informatics leaders in NHS organisations to accelerate the development of digitally enhanced models of care.1 We think that safe and effective redesign of clinical pathways and better use of health data requires not just digital leadership but also academic involvement.

Researchers are needed to generate and publish robust evidence on the benefits and harms of digitally enhanced service models. Rigorous analyses of healthcare databases require knowledge of frontline services and expertise in data science and statistics, which are best provided by a team with safe and accountable access to data. Without early involvement of researchers in the design of pathways, results can be wrong, and care can be misdirected or harmful. Despite warnings about the potential harms of risk stratification,2 such practice continues, directed by algorithms, untouched by frontline clinicians, and mostly unevaluated by researchers.

Academic researchers are currently held back from contributing to clinical redesign by unreasonable obstacles to data access. NHS England has streamlined data access for local authorities and commissioners,34 but researchers are left behind, jumping through the hoops of data applications, while witnessing shortcomings in the design and evaluation of new services.

Simultaneously, a minority of NHS data releases5 go to commercial companies that perform analytics for multiple clients, including NHS bodies. These users have few incentives or resources to document and publish how data are being used, let alone share their algorithms and build a knowledge base of methods and expertise. The risk is that patients, clinicians, and service providers might not be aware of, let alone be able to explain, how healthcare data are changing care. Without wider and more timely use of health data for research, the social contract with patients—to use health data for public benefit—risks being undermined.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 10 August 2017
Published date: 2017
Keywords: Letter

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 413249
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413249
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 0fe16aa8-7373-4528-856b-819428472453
ORCID for Peter Dutey-Magni: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8942-9836

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Aug 2017 16:31
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 15:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ruth Gilbert
Author: Peter Dutey-Magni ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×