The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Outcome of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP: results from the UK NCRI R-CHOP14v21 trial with combined analysis of molecular characteristics with the DSHNHL RICOVER-60 trial

Outcome of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP: results from the UK NCRI R-CHOP14v21 trial with combined analysis of molecular characteristics with the DSHNHL RICOVER-60 trial
Outcome of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP: results from the UK NCRI R-CHOP14v21 trial with combined analysis of molecular characteristics with the DSHNHL RICOVER-60 trial

BACKGROUND: There is an on-going debate whether 2- or 3-weekly administration of R-CHOP is the preferred first-line treatment for elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The UK NCRI R-CHOP14v21 randomized phase 3 trial did not demonstrate a difference in outcomes between R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients aged 19-88 years, but data on elderly patients have not been reported in detail so far. Here, we provide a subgroup analysis of patients ≥60 years treated on the R-CHOP14v21 trial with extended follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: 604 R-CHOP14v21 patients ≥60 years were included in this subgroup analysis, with a median follow-up of 77.7 months. To assess the impact of MYC rearrangements (MYC-R) and double-hit-lymphoma (DHL) on outcome in elderly patients, we performed a joint analysis of cases with available molecular data from the R-CHOP14v21 (N=217) and RICOVER-60 (N=204) trials.

RESULTS: Elderly DLBCL patients received high dose intensities with median total doses of ≥ 98% for all agents. Toxicities were similar in both arms with the exception of more grade ≥3 neutropenia (P<0.0001) and fewer grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia (P=0.05) in R-CHOP-21 vs. R-CHOP-14. The elderly patient population had a favorable 5-year overall survival (OS) of 69% (95%CI: 65-73). We did not identify any subgroup of patients that showed differential response to either regimen. In multivariable analysis including individual factors of the IPI, gender, bulk, B2M and albumin levels, only age and B2M were of independent prognostic significance for OS. Molecular analyses demonstrated a significant impact of MYC-R (HR = 1.96; 95%CI: 1.22-3.16; P=0.01) and DHL (HR = 2.21; 95%CI: 1.18-4.11; P=0.01) on OS in the combined trial cohorts, independent of other prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data support equivalence of both R-CHOP application forms in elderly DLBCL patients. Elderly MYC-R and DHL patients have inferior prognosis and should be considered for alternative treatment approaches.

Journal Article
1569-8041
1540-1546
Kühnl, A.
39424bf4-d57a-409c-8c6e-6a8d5b87c9bf
Cunningham, D.
02b4fd3a-f452-4419-96a7-f98f609f098d
Counsell, N.
9a88deee-7e79-42b0-a130-ebe6009f1b6e
Hawkes, E.A.
0ef4814a-1abf-4772-98f1-2352b836b821
Qian, W.
4081a032-ee26-4c53-8a87-e9553ccda8fd
Smith, P.
660e96a8-f205-4553-b8dc-73b19f0ace77
Chadwick, N.
bcf828a2-fc10-4009-9248-6579bd88a2b9
Lawrie, A.
499ae295-ea78-427c-a849-fcbf76d30a9d
Mouncey, P.
c6daff38-ce56-4fbe-b5d3-d79c1da3a207
Jack, A.
917ffac2-6e87-4c46-b254-af4e41044f7e
Pocock, C.
a137d833-44ba-4f19-af4b-e7476b8a8d39
Ardeshna, K.M.
2d3f2d63-9861-46f3-8212-29c19b41cc6a
Radford, J.
1a8a0bd5-8ef3-46af-b35c-3a4bba491eee
McMillan, A.
a5fc7302-2727-4285-a820-7d8dca667566
Davies, J.
2933d3b1-0868-4cd5-8e61-866ded62be28
Turner, D.
1c225948-cdbc-40b8-8a1d-a7eb71fe58bb
Kruger, A.
dd6ba4b4-3baa-49b3-a8ee-bc8d00718aed
Johnson, P.
3f6068ce-171e-4c2c-aca9-dc9b6a37413f
Gambell, J.
78b40b90-92c0-48d0-b2f3-198e95e6ab33
Rosenwald, A.
374320dc-80c2-43c3-953f-3fdb1584789e
Ott, G.
991f07a1-7d99-46ad-95c5-d0151646b774
Horn, H.
a9b7db4c-0739-4908-b9a8-74e3f53faefd
Ziepert, M.
90f1a765-43ef-400d-8387-a98db138448e
Pfreundschuh, M.
ae57a75a-e89e-46dd-8d49-f3a084c3b64e
Linch, D.
44bd0701-104b-4b31-9239-f8f93e436109
Kühnl, A.
39424bf4-d57a-409c-8c6e-6a8d5b87c9bf
Cunningham, D.
02b4fd3a-f452-4419-96a7-f98f609f098d
Counsell, N.
9a88deee-7e79-42b0-a130-ebe6009f1b6e
Hawkes, E.A.
0ef4814a-1abf-4772-98f1-2352b836b821
Qian, W.
4081a032-ee26-4c53-8a87-e9553ccda8fd
Smith, P.
660e96a8-f205-4553-b8dc-73b19f0ace77
Chadwick, N.
bcf828a2-fc10-4009-9248-6579bd88a2b9
Lawrie, A.
499ae295-ea78-427c-a849-fcbf76d30a9d
Mouncey, P.
c6daff38-ce56-4fbe-b5d3-d79c1da3a207
Jack, A.
917ffac2-6e87-4c46-b254-af4e41044f7e
Pocock, C.
a137d833-44ba-4f19-af4b-e7476b8a8d39
Ardeshna, K.M.
2d3f2d63-9861-46f3-8212-29c19b41cc6a
Radford, J.
1a8a0bd5-8ef3-46af-b35c-3a4bba491eee
McMillan, A.
a5fc7302-2727-4285-a820-7d8dca667566
Davies, J.
2933d3b1-0868-4cd5-8e61-866ded62be28
Turner, D.
1c225948-cdbc-40b8-8a1d-a7eb71fe58bb
Kruger, A.
dd6ba4b4-3baa-49b3-a8ee-bc8d00718aed
Johnson, P.
3f6068ce-171e-4c2c-aca9-dc9b6a37413f
Gambell, J.
78b40b90-92c0-48d0-b2f3-198e95e6ab33
Rosenwald, A.
374320dc-80c2-43c3-953f-3fdb1584789e
Ott, G.
991f07a1-7d99-46ad-95c5-d0151646b774
Horn, H.
a9b7db4c-0739-4908-b9a8-74e3f53faefd
Ziepert, M.
90f1a765-43ef-400d-8387-a98db138448e
Pfreundschuh, M.
ae57a75a-e89e-46dd-8d49-f3a084c3b64e
Linch, D.
44bd0701-104b-4b31-9239-f8f93e436109

Kühnl, A., Cunningham, D., Counsell, N., Hawkes, E.A., Qian, W., Smith, P., Chadwick, N., Lawrie, A., Mouncey, P., Jack, A., Pocock, C., Ardeshna, K.M., Radford, J., McMillan, A., Davies, J., Turner, D., Kruger, A., Johnson, P., Gambell, J., Rosenwald, A., Ott, G., Horn, H., Ziepert, M., Pfreundschuh, M. and Linch, D. (2017) Outcome of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP: results from the UK NCRI R-CHOP14v21 trial with combined analysis of molecular characteristics with the DSHNHL RICOVER-60 trial. Annals of Oncology, 28 (7), 1540-1546. (doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx128).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an on-going debate whether 2- or 3-weekly administration of R-CHOP is the preferred first-line treatment for elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The UK NCRI R-CHOP14v21 randomized phase 3 trial did not demonstrate a difference in outcomes between R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients aged 19-88 years, but data on elderly patients have not been reported in detail so far. Here, we provide a subgroup analysis of patients ≥60 years treated on the R-CHOP14v21 trial with extended follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: 604 R-CHOP14v21 patients ≥60 years were included in this subgroup analysis, with a median follow-up of 77.7 months. To assess the impact of MYC rearrangements (MYC-R) and double-hit-lymphoma (DHL) on outcome in elderly patients, we performed a joint analysis of cases with available molecular data from the R-CHOP14v21 (N=217) and RICOVER-60 (N=204) trials.

RESULTS: Elderly DLBCL patients received high dose intensities with median total doses of ≥ 98% for all agents. Toxicities were similar in both arms with the exception of more grade ≥3 neutropenia (P<0.0001) and fewer grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia (P=0.05) in R-CHOP-21 vs. R-CHOP-14. The elderly patient population had a favorable 5-year overall survival (OS) of 69% (95%CI: 65-73). We did not identify any subgroup of patients that showed differential response to either regimen. In multivariable analysis including individual factors of the IPI, gender, bulk, B2M and albumin levels, only age and B2M were of independent prognostic significance for OS. Molecular analyses demonstrated a significant impact of MYC-R (HR = 1.96; 95%CI: 1.22-3.16; P=0.01) and DHL (HR = 2.21; 95%CI: 1.18-4.11; P=0.01) on OS in the combined trial cohorts, independent of other prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data support equivalence of both R-CHOP application forms in elderly DLBCL patients. Elderly MYC-R and DHL patients have inferior prognosis and should be considered for alternative treatment approaches.

Text
mdx128
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (300kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 December 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 April 2017
Published date: July 2017
Keywords: Journal Article

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 413537
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413537
ISSN: 1569-8041
PURE UUID: 4932ad5f-8c76-4889-b30a-e810f874dabc
ORCID for P. Johnson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2306-4974

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Aug 2017 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A. Kühnl
Author: D. Cunningham
Author: N. Counsell
Author: E.A. Hawkes
Author: W. Qian
Author: P. Smith
Author: N. Chadwick
Author: A. Lawrie
Author: P. Mouncey
Author: A. Jack
Author: C. Pocock
Author: K.M. Ardeshna
Author: J. Radford
Author: A. McMillan
Author: J. Davies
Author: D. Turner
Author: A. Kruger
Author: P. Johnson ORCID iD
Author: J. Gambell
Author: A. Rosenwald
Author: G. Ott
Author: H. Horn
Author: M. Ziepert
Author: M. Pfreundschuh
Author: D. Linch

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×