The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A framework for evaluating the accessibility of raw materials from end-of-life products and the Earth's crust

A framework for evaluating the accessibility of raw materials from end-of-life products and the Earth's crust
A framework for evaluating the accessibility of raw materials from end-of-life products and the Earth's crust
An increasing number of geochemically scarce metallic raw materials are entering into our lives via new technologies. A reversal of this trend is not foreseeable, leading to concerns regarding the security of their supply. However, the evaluation of raw material supply is currently hampered by inconsistent use of fundamental terminologies and incomplete assessment criteria. In this paper, we aim to establish a consistent framework for evaluating raw material supply from both anthropogenic and geological sources. A method for concept extraction was applied to evaluate systematically the use of fundamental terms in the evaluation of raw material supply. The results have shown that ‘availability’ is commonly used in raw material supply evaluations, whilst other researchers suggest that raw material supply should be evaluated based on ‘accessibility’. It was revealed that ‘accessibility’ actually comprises two aspects: ‘availability’ and ‘approachability’. Raw material ‘approachability’ has not previously been explicitly addressed at a system level. A novel, consistent framework for evaluating raw material supply was therefore developed. To demonstrate the application of the established framework, we evaluated the raw material supply of four rare earth element case studies. Three case studies are End-of-Life products (the anthroposphere) from Switzerland: (i) phosphors in fluorescent lamps, (i) permanent magnets in the drive motors of electric cars and (iii) fibre optic cable. The fourth case study source is the Earth’s crust (the geosphere): Mount Weld deposit in Australia. The framework comprises a comprehensive evaluation of six components relating to raw material mining and processing: their geological knowledge, eligibility, technology, economic, societal and environmental impacts. Our results show that metals are not considered to be fully accessible in any of the case studies due to a lack of necessary technologies and potential societal and environmental impacts. The framework presented here can serve as a starting point for the development of an evaluation framework for raw material accessibility at an early project development stage.
raw materials, recycling, anthropogenic, geological, mining, sustainability
0956-053X
534-546
Mueller, Sandra R.
b8e1a14f-9ca4-4024-a498-e41e699a6054
Wager, Patrick A.
6ae71926-8114-4d1b-8cd7-41ac928c860a
Turner, David A.
30880c29-7419-43a9-8e74-e5558d93ce93
Shaw, Peter J.
935dfebf-9fb6-483c-86da-a21dba8c1989
Williams, Ian D.
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22
Mueller, Sandra R.
b8e1a14f-9ca4-4024-a498-e41e699a6054
Wager, Patrick A.
6ae71926-8114-4d1b-8cd7-41ac928c860a
Turner, David A.
30880c29-7419-43a9-8e74-e5558d93ce93
Shaw, Peter J.
935dfebf-9fb6-483c-86da-a21dba8c1989
Williams, Ian D.
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22

Mueller, Sandra R., Wager, Patrick A., Turner, David A., Shaw, Peter J. and Williams, Ian D. (2017) A framework for evaluating the accessibility of raw materials from end-of-life products and the Earth's crust. Waste Management, 68, 534-546. (doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.043).

Record type: Article

Abstract

An increasing number of geochemically scarce metallic raw materials are entering into our lives via new technologies. A reversal of this trend is not foreseeable, leading to concerns regarding the security of their supply. However, the evaluation of raw material supply is currently hampered by inconsistent use of fundamental terminologies and incomplete assessment criteria. In this paper, we aim to establish a consistent framework for evaluating raw material supply from both anthropogenic and geological sources. A method for concept extraction was applied to evaluate systematically the use of fundamental terms in the evaluation of raw material supply. The results have shown that ‘availability’ is commonly used in raw material supply evaluations, whilst other researchers suggest that raw material supply should be evaluated based on ‘accessibility’. It was revealed that ‘accessibility’ actually comprises two aspects: ‘availability’ and ‘approachability’. Raw material ‘approachability’ has not previously been explicitly addressed at a system level. A novel, consistent framework for evaluating raw material supply was therefore developed. To demonstrate the application of the established framework, we evaluated the raw material supply of four rare earth element case studies. Three case studies are End-of-Life products (the anthroposphere) from Switzerland: (i) phosphors in fluorescent lamps, (i) permanent magnets in the drive motors of electric cars and (iii) fibre optic cable. The fourth case study source is the Earth’s crust (the geosphere): Mount Weld deposit in Australia. The framework comprises a comprehensive evaluation of six components relating to raw material mining and processing: their geological knowledge, eligibility, technology, economic, societal and environmental impacts. Our results show that metals are not considered to be fully accessible in any of the case studies due to a lack of necessary technologies and potential societal and environmental impacts. The framework presented here can serve as a starting point for the development of an evaluation framework for raw material accessibility at an early project development stage.

Text
1-s2.0-S0956053X17303963-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 May 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 June 2017
Published date: October 2017
Keywords: raw materials, recycling, anthropogenic, geological, mining, sustainability

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 413629
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413629
ISSN: 0956-053X
PURE UUID: bf2f97e4-9a46-4fc1-ae7d-122eb0428663
ORCID for Peter J. Shaw: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-5010
ORCID for Ian D. Williams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0121-1219

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Aug 2017 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sandra R. Mueller
Author: Patrick A. Wager
Author: David A. Turner
Author: Peter J. Shaw ORCID iD
Author: Ian D. Williams ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×