The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The role of Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) with humidification in the development of facial pressure ulcers

The role of Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) with humidification in the development of facial pressure ulcers
The role of Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) with humidification in the development of facial pressure ulcers

Rationale

The use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) masks have been implicated in damaging facial skin tissue, consequently having a considerableeffect on patients’ quality of life and wound care. The use of humidification with NIV is common practice, but its role in the developmentof facial pressure ulceration, has not been studied.


Methods

A crossover cohort design was used in this study, with 15 healthy volunteers serving as their own controls, randomly receiving both 10cmH2O of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with humidification, and without through an oronasal mask. Skin integrity wasevaluated by measuring transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration and skin pH at the nose bridge. Device-skin interface conditions(pressure and microclimate) were recorded at the bridge of the nose and both cheeks. The pro-inflammatory cytokine Interleukin 1α(IL-1α) was collected from the nose bridge before and after CPAP application using Sebutape. Nasal symptom scoring was collected usinga six-point nasal score.

Results

Humidified CPAP significantly increases TEWL (P<0.001) and skin humidity (P<0.02) compared to non-humidified CPAP (table 1). Therewere no significant differences in skin hydration, skin pH, skin temperature and cytokine expression between both conditions. However,higher mean ratios of Interleukin-1α concentrations were recorded following humidified CPAP application. There was a significantincrease in the interface pressure at the nose bridge following CPAP application (P<0.04), with higher baseline interface pressure at thenose bridge comparing with left (P<0.003) and right (P<0.006) cheeks. Non-humidified CPAP elevated nasal discomfort, as reported by theparticipants.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that humidification with NIV has a significant disrupting effect on the barrier function of facial skin, associated withsignificant changes in skin microclimate and function. Prophylactic strategies to maintain dry skin and manage the microclimate betweenthe skin and the mask are required to safeguard skin integrity.

Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Voegeli, David
e6f5d112-55b0-40c1-a6ad-8929a2d84a10
Alqahtani, Jaber S.
1b64f1a5-b742-4d95-a605-2493856180ad
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Voegeli, David
e6f5d112-55b0-40c1-a6ad-8929a2d84a10
Alqahtani, Jaber S.
1b64f1a5-b742-4d95-a605-2493856180ad

Worsley, Peter, Voegeli, David and Alqahtani, Jaber S. (2017) The role of Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) with humidification in the development of facial pressure ulcers. American Thoracic Society, , Washington, DC, United States. 21 - 24 May 2017.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Rationale

The use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) masks have been implicated in damaging facial skin tissue, consequently having a considerableeffect on patients’ quality of life and wound care. The use of humidification with NIV is common practice, but its role in the developmentof facial pressure ulceration, has not been studied.


Methods

A crossover cohort design was used in this study, with 15 healthy volunteers serving as their own controls, randomly receiving both 10cmH2O of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with humidification, and without through an oronasal mask. Skin integrity wasevaluated by measuring transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration and skin pH at the nose bridge. Device-skin interface conditions(pressure and microclimate) were recorded at the bridge of the nose and both cheeks. The pro-inflammatory cytokine Interleukin 1α(IL-1α) was collected from the nose bridge before and after CPAP application using Sebutape. Nasal symptom scoring was collected usinga six-point nasal score.

Results

Humidified CPAP significantly increases TEWL (P<0.001) and skin humidity (P<0.02) compared to non-humidified CPAP (table 1). Therewere no significant differences in skin hydration, skin pH, skin temperature and cytokine expression between both conditions. However,higher mean ratios of Interleukin-1α concentrations were recorded following humidified CPAP application. There was a significantincrease in the interface pressure at the nose bridge following CPAP application (P<0.04), with higher baseline interface pressure at thenose bridge comparing with left (P<0.003) and right (P<0.006) cheeks. Non-humidified CPAP elevated nasal discomfort, as reported by theparticipants.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that humidification with NIV has a significant disrupting effect on the barrier function of facial skin, associated withsignificant changes in skin microclimate and function. Prophylactic strategies to maintain dry skin and manage the microclimate betweenthe skin and the mask are required to safeguard skin integrity.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 23 January 2017
Published date: 23 May 2017
Additional Information: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2017;195:A6565
Venue - Dates: American Thoracic Society, , Washington, DC, United States, 2017-05-21 - 2017-05-24

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 413663
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413663
PURE UUID: 84ba6821-2f3c-42e6-9873-70e004fb26de
ORCID for Peter Worsley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-5042
ORCID for David Voegeli: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3457-7177

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Aug 2017 16:31
Last modified: 12 Dec 2021 03:42

Export record

Contributors

Author: Peter Worsley ORCID iD
Author: David Voegeli ORCID iD
Author: Jaber S. Alqahtani

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×