The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Defining integrative medicine in narrative and systematic reviews: A suggested checklist for reporting

Defining integrative medicine in narrative and systematic reviews: A suggested checklist for reporting
Defining integrative medicine in narrative and systematic reviews: A suggested checklist for reporting
AbstractIntroduction The use of the term integrative medicine (IM) is evolving over time but its exact definition remains imprecise. In this paper we use \ IM\ to mean complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) provided holistically and in conjunction with conventional medicine. Drawing from the experience of experts in different geographical areas (USA, UK, Australia, and China), this review aimed to identify key elements which could be used to define \ IM\ in order to develop a potential guide for reporting \ IM\ in clinical research. Method A total of 54 sources were searched (including websites of governments, key authorities, representative clinical sites, academic journals, relevant textbooks) to identify definitions of \ IM\ from the four countries from 1990 to 2014. Key elements characterizing \ IM\ were extracted and categorized using a thematic approach in order to identify the key items to consider when reporting \ IM\ in research studies. Results Seventeen definitions were identified and extracted from 17 sources. The remaining 37 sources did not provide a definition of IM. The most common key elements which defined \ IM\ were: using aspects of both \ CAM\ and conventional medicine; goals of health and healing; holistic approach; optimum treatment; and the body's innate healing response. Integration was also defined at three levels: theoretical, diagnostic and therapeutic. A potential checklist of items is proposed for reporting \ IM\ in clinical studies. Conclusion This paper identifies the key elements which define \ IM\ and provides a potential reporting guide for \ IM\ clinical trials and which could be used in narrative/systematic reviews. Further debate, discussion and input is now needed from the research and clinical \ IM\ communities to further advance this agenda. This article belongs to the Special Issue: Traditional and Integrative Approaches for Global Health.
Integrative medicine Definition Cross-cultural Reporting guidelines Checklist Systematic review
1876-3820
76-84
Hu, Xiao-Yang
65904b24-3775-4b14-9532-eb703a056655
Lorenc, Ava
08d9d6c2-99d6-4409-9577-c792c7d41751
Kemper, Kathi
a01f5296-a3cd-48be-89c0-e890d979787c
Liu, Jian-Ping
4c1de9c3-e9c2-4d4e-a0a4-dad123a39c76
Adams, Jon
12b2c9e7-6fdb-41e3-8d4d-33a44ceffb3e
Robinson, Nicola
96ec8bbf-fd1e-4ce2-be99-17eb1051fed9
Hu, Xiao-Yang
65904b24-3775-4b14-9532-eb703a056655
Lorenc, Ava
08d9d6c2-99d6-4409-9577-c792c7d41751
Kemper, Kathi
a01f5296-a3cd-48be-89c0-e890d979787c
Liu, Jian-Ping
4c1de9c3-e9c2-4d4e-a0a4-dad123a39c76
Adams, Jon
12b2c9e7-6fdb-41e3-8d4d-33a44ceffb3e
Robinson, Nicola
96ec8bbf-fd1e-4ce2-be99-17eb1051fed9

Hu, Xiao-Yang, Lorenc, Ava, Kemper, Kathi, Liu, Jian-Ping, Adams, Jon and Robinson, Nicola (2015) Defining integrative medicine in narrative and systematic reviews: A suggested checklist for reporting. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 7 (1), 76-84. (doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2014.11.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction The use of the term integrative medicine (IM) is evolving over time but its exact definition remains imprecise. In this paper we use \ IM\ to mean complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) provided holistically and in conjunction with conventional medicine. Drawing from the experience of experts in different geographical areas (USA, UK, Australia, and China), this review aimed to identify key elements which could be used to define \ IM\ in order to develop a potential guide for reporting \ IM\ in clinical research. Method A total of 54 sources were searched (including websites of governments, key authorities, representative clinical sites, academic journals, relevant textbooks) to identify definitions of \ IM\ from the four countries from 1990 to 2014. Key elements characterizing \ IM\ were extracted and categorized using a thematic approach in order to identify the key items to consider when reporting \ IM\ in research studies. Results Seventeen definitions were identified and extracted from 17 sources. The remaining 37 sources did not provide a definition of IM. The most common key elements which defined \ IM\ were: using aspects of both \ CAM\ and conventional medicine; goals of health and healing; holistic approach; optimum treatment; and the body's innate healing response. Integration was also defined at three levels: theoretical, diagnostic and therapeutic. A potential checklist of items is proposed for reporting \ IM\ in clinical studies. Conclusion This paper identifies the key elements which define \ IM\ and provides a potential reporting guide for \ IM\ clinical trials and which could be used in narrative/systematic reviews. Further debate, discussion and input is now needed from the research and clinical \ IM\ communities to further advance this agenda. This article belongs to the Special Issue: Traditional and Integrative Approaches for Global Health.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 24 November 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 January 2015
Published date: February 2015
Additional Information: A Special Issue: Traditional and Integrative Approaches for Global Health
Keywords: Integrative medicine Definition Cross-cultural Reporting guidelines Checklist Systematic review

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 413740
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413740
ISSN: 1876-3820
PURE UUID: fc69643e-11ab-46de-a97a-aefe2c405b17
ORCID for Xiao-Yang Hu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3143-7999

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Sep 2017 16:32
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:24

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Xiao-Yang Hu ORCID iD
Author: Ava Lorenc
Author: Kathi Kemper
Author: Jian-Ping Liu
Author: Jon Adams
Author: Nicola Robinson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×