The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sensitivity of blanket peat vegetation and hydrochemistry to local disturbances

Sensitivity of blanket peat vegetation and hydrochemistry to local disturbances
Sensitivity of blanket peat vegetation and hydrochemistry to local disturbances

At the ecosystem scale, peatlands can be extremely resilient to perturbations. Yet, they are very sensitive to local disturbances, especially mechanical perturbations (e.g. trampling). The effects of these disturbances on vegetation, and potential effects on hydrochemical conditions along the peat surface, however, are largely unknown.We used three research tracks (paths researchers use to access their study sites) differing in time of abandonment to investigate the impact of local disturbance (trampling) on the vegetation and its short-term (≤ 2 year) recovery in a flagship research blanket peatland. Additionally, we examined the effects of local disturbance on fluvial runoff events and the concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in runoff water.Local disturbance heavily impacted peat vegetation, resulting in large areas of scarred and churned peat. Recovery of vascular plants along abandoned tracks was slow, but a functional Sphagnum layer re-established after just one year.The absence of vegetation elicited an increase in the number of runoff events along the tracks, by which POC runoff from the tracks increased. POC concentrations were highest in the surface water from the recently abandoned track, while they were low in the runoff water from the track abandoned longest and the undisturbed control track. We attribute this to the relatively fast recovery of the Sphagnum vegetation. DOC concentrations did not differ significantly either spatially or temporally in surface runoff or soil solution waters.While at an ecosystem scale local disturbances may be negligible in terms of carbon loss, our data points to the need for further research on the potential long-term effects of local disturbance on the vegetation, and significant effects on local scale carbon fluxes. Moreover, the effects of disturbances could be long-lasting and their role on ecosystem processes should not be underestimated.

DOC, Fluvial runoff, Moor House, Plant functional types, Plant re-establishment, POC, Trampling
0048-9697
5028-5034
Robroek, Bjorn J M
06dcb269-687c-41db-ab73-f61899617f92
Smart, Richard P.
b830a1c7-dd24-4ce0-aad9-bf0f4a4bb891
Holden, Joseph
0ed4d565-754f-4e34-a152-3dc065a3fcfd
Robroek, Bjorn J M
06dcb269-687c-41db-ab73-f61899617f92
Smart, Richard P.
b830a1c7-dd24-4ce0-aad9-bf0f4a4bb891
Holden, Joseph
0ed4d565-754f-4e34-a152-3dc065a3fcfd

Robroek, Bjorn J M, Smart, Richard P. and Holden, Joseph (2010) Sensitivity of blanket peat vegetation and hydrochemistry to local disturbances. Science of the Total Environment, 408 (21), 5028-5034. (doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.027).

Record type: Article

Abstract

At the ecosystem scale, peatlands can be extremely resilient to perturbations. Yet, they are very sensitive to local disturbances, especially mechanical perturbations (e.g. trampling). The effects of these disturbances on vegetation, and potential effects on hydrochemical conditions along the peat surface, however, are largely unknown.We used three research tracks (paths researchers use to access their study sites) differing in time of abandonment to investigate the impact of local disturbance (trampling) on the vegetation and its short-term (≤ 2 year) recovery in a flagship research blanket peatland. Additionally, we examined the effects of local disturbance on fluvial runoff events and the concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in runoff water.Local disturbance heavily impacted peat vegetation, resulting in large areas of scarred and churned peat. Recovery of vascular plants along abandoned tracks was slow, but a functional Sphagnum layer re-established after just one year.The absence of vegetation elicited an increase in the number of runoff events along the tracks, by which POC runoff from the tracks increased. POC concentrations were highest in the surface water from the recently abandoned track, while they were low in the runoff water from the track abandoned longest and the undisturbed control track. We attribute this to the relatively fast recovery of the Sphagnum vegetation. DOC concentrations did not differ significantly either spatially or temporally in surface runoff or soil solution waters.While at an ecosystem scale local disturbances may be negligible in terms of carbon loss, our data points to the need for further research on the potential long-term effects of local disturbance on the vegetation, and significant effects on local scale carbon fluxes. Moreover, the effects of disturbances could be long-lasting and their role on ecosystem processes should not be underestimated.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2010
Keywords: DOC, Fluvial runoff, Moor House, Plant functional types, Plant re-establishment, POC, Trampling

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 413771
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413771
ISSN: 0048-9697
PURE UUID: 3f3145da-51d2-4c31-b2e1-e41cba71e6e8
ORCID for Bjorn J M Robroek: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6714-0652

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Sep 2017 16:31
Last modified: 05 Jun 2024 18:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Bjorn J M Robroek ORCID iD
Author: Richard P. Smart
Author: Joseph Holden

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×