State Authenticity as Fit to Environment: the implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and self-segregation
State Authenticity as Fit to Environment: the implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and self-segregation
People seek out situations that “fit,” but the concept of fit is not well understood. We introduce State Authenticity as Fit to the Environment (SAFE), a conceptual framework for understanding how social identities motivate the situations that people approach or avoid. Drawing from but expanding the authenticity literature, we first outline three types of person–environment fit: self-concept fit, goal fit, and social fit. Each type of fit, we argue, facilitates cognitive fluency, motivational fluency, and social fluency that promote state authenticity and drive approach or avoidance behaviors. Using this model, we assert that contexts subtly signal social identities in ways that implicate each type of fit, eliciting state authenticity for advantaged groups but state inauthenticity for disadvantaged groups. Given that people strive to be authentic, these processes cascade down to self-segregation among social groups, reinforcing social inequalities. We conclude by mapping out directions for research on relevant mechanisms and boundary conditions.
228-259
Schmader, Toni
1778a325-870f-441a-a7d6-f2bced51a699
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
August 2018
Schmader, Toni
1778a325-870f-441a-a7d6-f2bced51a699
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Schmader, Toni and Sedikides, Constantine
(2018)
State Authenticity as Fit to Environment: the implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and self-segregation.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22 (3), .
(doi:10.1177/1088868317734080).
Abstract
People seek out situations that “fit,” but the concept of fit is not well understood. We introduce State Authenticity as Fit to the Environment (SAFE), a conceptual framework for understanding how social identities motivate the situations that people approach or avoid. Drawing from but expanding the authenticity literature, we first outline three types of person–environment fit: self-concept fit, goal fit, and social fit. Each type of fit, we argue, facilitates cognitive fluency, motivational fluency, and social fluency that promote state authenticity and drive approach or avoidance behaviors. Using this model, we assert that contexts subtly signal social identities in ways that implicate each type of fit, eliciting state authenticity for advantaged groups but state inauthenticity for disadvantaged groups. Given that people strive to be authentic, these processes cascade down to self-segregation among social groups, reinforcing social inequalities. We conclude by mapping out directions for research on relevant mechanisms and boundary conditions.
Text
Schmader & Sedikides, in press, PSPR
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 September 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 October 2017
Published date: August 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 413824
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413824
PURE UUID: 98e3cbe1-32b3-41e5-80d5-055bb51a5852
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Sep 2017 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Toni Schmader
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics