The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluation of the ECOSSE model to predict heterotrophic soil respiration by direct measurements: Evaluating the ECOSSE model by direct measurements

Evaluation of the ECOSSE model to predict heterotrophic soil respiration by direct measurements: Evaluating the ECOSSE model by direct measurements
Evaluation of the ECOSSE model to predict heterotrophic soil respiration by direct measurements: Evaluating the ECOSSE model by direct measurements
This paper aims to evaluate the suitability of the ECOSSE model to estimate soil heterotrophic respiration (Rh) from arable land and short rotation coppices of poplar and willow. Between 2011 and 2013, we measured Rh with automatic closed dynamic chambers on root exclusion plots at one site in the UK (willow, mixed commercial genotypes of Salix spp.) and two sites in Italy (arable and poplar, Populus  ×  Canadensis Moench, Oudemberg genotype), and compared these measured fluxes to simulated values of Rh with the ECOSSE model. Correlation coefficients (r) between modelled and measured monthly Rh data were strong and significant, with a range between 0.81 and 0.96 for all three types of vegetation. There was no significant error and bias in the model for any site. The model was able to predict seasonal trends in Rh at all three sites even though it occasionally underestimated the flux values during warm weather in spring and summer. Because of the strong correlation between the measured and modelled values, it is unlikely that underestimation of the flux is the result of missing processes in the model. Therefore, further detailed monitoring of Rh is needed to modify the model. In this research, a limited set of input data was used to simulate Rh at the three sites. Nevertheless, overall results of the model evaluation suggest that the ECOSSE model simulates soil Rh adequately under all land uses tested and that continuous and direct measurements (such as automatic chambers installed on root-exclusion plots) are a useful tool to test model performance to simulate Rh at the site level.
1351-0754
384-393
Dondini, M.
3aea5bbb-aa50-424d-8bac-855ce80cd569
Alberti, G.
95e7477a-1b96-470a-be15-1778ebbdaaaf
Delle Vedove, G.
81cc8f20-0b09-480c-a0c6-faefe1cf6461
Ventura, M.
7facc630-7adb-4680-8595-7968f9d27c82
Tonon, G.
f3971317-b072-4cc8-99b0-8ae993fd8124
Viger, M.
3f2de523-4a9f-44da-9f60-73d6cbc3edba
Harris, Z. M.
536d8906-e68a-4f2e-b920-1c4294c7e97b
Jenkins, J.R.
4b73fa5c-7799-4f52-ac5f-f4534bbefc73
Richards, M.
d76b0506-723e-4ed8-9fbc-a522f515e797
Pogson, M.
4bb34332-1121-4e1c-877c-46bca09e0223
Taylor, G.
aca130d8-98fe-4178-82ff-4ae05dddd327
Smith, J.U.
0858f506-9335-4e00-9a04-1160b55bd92a
Smith, P.
11f678ab-4aee-426a-aedd-19719d80bbbc
Dondini, M.
3aea5bbb-aa50-424d-8bac-855ce80cd569
Alberti, G.
95e7477a-1b96-470a-be15-1778ebbdaaaf
Delle Vedove, G.
81cc8f20-0b09-480c-a0c6-faefe1cf6461
Ventura, M.
7facc630-7adb-4680-8595-7968f9d27c82
Tonon, G.
f3971317-b072-4cc8-99b0-8ae993fd8124
Viger, M.
3f2de523-4a9f-44da-9f60-73d6cbc3edba
Harris, Z. M.
536d8906-e68a-4f2e-b920-1c4294c7e97b
Jenkins, J.R.
4b73fa5c-7799-4f52-ac5f-f4534bbefc73
Richards, M.
d76b0506-723e-4ed8-9fbc-a522f515e797
Pogson, M.
4bb34332-1121-4e1c-877c-46bca09e0223
Taylor, G.
aca130d8-98fe-4178-82ff-4ae05dddd327
Smith, J.U.
0858f506-9335-4e00-9a04-1160b55bd92a
Smith, P.
11f678ab-4aee-426a-aedd-19719d80bbbc

Dondini, M., Alberti, G., Delle Vedove, G., Ventura, M., Tonon, G., Viger, M., Harris, Z. M., Jenkins, J.R., Richards, M., Pogson, M., Taylor, G., Smith, J.U. and Smith, P. (2017) Evaluation of the ECOSSE model to predict heterotrophic soil respiration by direct measurements: Evaluating the ECOSSE model by direct measurements. European Journal of Soil Science, 68 (3), 384-393. (doi:10.1111/ejss.12416).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the suitability of the ECOSSE model to estimate soil heterotrophic respiration (Rh) from arable land and short rotation coppices of poplar and willow. Between 2011 and 2013, we measured Rh with automatic closed dynamic chambers on root exclusion plots at one site in the UK (willow, mixed commercial genotypes of Salix spp.) and two sites in Italy (arable and poplar, Populus  ×  Canadensis Moench, Oudemberg genotype), and compared these measured fluxes to simulated values of Rh with the ECOSSE model. Correlation coefficients (r) between modelled and measured monthly Rh data were strong and significant, with a range between 0.81 and 0.96 for all three types of vegetation. There was no significant error and bias in the model for any site. The model was able to predict seasonal trends in Rh at all three sites even though it occasionally underestimated the flux values during warm weather in spring and summer. Because of the strong correlation between the measured and modelled values, it is unlikely that underestimation of the flux is the result of missing processes in the model. Therefore, further detailed monitoring of Rh is needed to modify the model. In this research, a limited set of input data was used to simulate Rh at the three sites. Nevertheless, overall results of the model evaluation suggest that the ECOSSE model simulates soil Rh adequately under all land uses tested and that continuous and direct measurements (such as automatic chambers installed on root-exclusion plots) are a useful tool to test model performance to simulate Rh at the site level.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 March 2017
Published date: 1 May 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 413891
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413891
ISSN: 1351-0754
PURE UUID: 8eb7ea65-de64-4f96-918e-ea719d129967

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Sep 2017 16:31
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 13:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M. Dondini
Author: G. Alberti
Author: G. Delle Vedove
Author: M. Ventura
Author: G. Tonon
Author: M. Viger
Author: Z. M. Harris
Author: J.R. Jenkins
Author: M. Richards
Author: M. Pogson
Author: G. Taylor
Author: J.U. Smith
Author: P. Smith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×