Accepting the unknowables of entrepreneurship and overcoming philosophical obstacles to scientific progress
Accepting the unknowables of entrepreneurship and overcoming philosophical obstacles to scientific progress
In his recent commentary, Per Davidsson questions the potential of the actualization perspective of entrepreneurship to move the field forward. The actualization approach stresses that opportunities do not exist as actualized and empirically undiscovered entities, but as the profit propensities that may actualize when properly exploited. This worldview emphatically acknowledges an impenetrable region of “unknowable”: we cannot know where and when opportunities exist or whether they can be actualized by any given agent. Davidsson is, therefore, justified to doubt that the propensity conceptualization can facilitate the production of predictive knowledge involving the causal interaction between empirically tractable entities with events of “action” and “success”. However, Davidsson is unjustifiably concerned that this limitation hinders the scientific progress of entrepreneurship. This concern only reflects philosophical preoccupations of an empiricist nature, which ought to be uprooted for the study of entrepreneurship to progress along genuinely scientific pathways.
71-77
Ramoglou, Stratos
f3fffbf5-0f1f-46e1-93af-a13e18945610
Tsang, Eric W.K.
cf717d04-e675-469b-9f2d-91724e1055e1
November 2017
Ramoglou, Stratos
f3fffbf5-0f1f-46e1-93af-a13e18945610
Tsang, Eric W.K.
cf717d04-e675-469b-9f2d-91724e1055e1
Ramoglou, Stratos and Tsang, Eric W.K.
(2017)
Accepting the unknowables of entrepreneurship and overcoming philosophical obstacles to scientific progress.
Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, .
(doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.07.001).
Abstract
In his recent commentary, Per Davidsson questions the potential of the actualization perspective of entrepreneurship to move the field forward. The actualization approach stresses that opportunities do not exist as actualized and empirically undiscovered entities, but as the profit propensities that may actualize when properly exploited. This worldview emphatically acknowledges an impenetrable region of “unknowable”: we cannot know where and when opportunities exist or whether they can be actualized by any given agent. Davidsson is, therefore, justified to doubt that the propensity conceptualization can facilitate the production of predictive knowledge involving the causal interaction between empirically tractable entities with events of “action” and “success”. However, Davidsson is unjustifiably concerned that this limitation hinders the scientific progress of entrepreneurship. This concern only reflects philosophical preoccupations of an empiricist nature, which ought to be uprooted for the study of entrepreneurship to progress along genuinely scientific pathways.
Text
JBVI prepub - pure
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
1-s2.0-S2352673417300768-main(1)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 8 July 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 July 2017
Published date: November 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 413989
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413989
PURE UUID: 509d9917-1b1a-4e99-b3be-51588f702a37
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Sep 2017 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Eric W.K. Tsang
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
Loading...
View more statistics