The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Long-term response and design of two geosynthetics: effect of field installation damage

Long-term response and design of two geosynthetics: effect of field installation damage
Long-term response and design of two geosynthetics: effect of field installation damage
This paper contributes to understanding how installation damage of geosynthetics influences their long-term response and design. A geotextile and a geogrid were exhumed after installation under real conditions; their long-term tensile behaviour was investigated using conventional creep and creep rupture tests. Reduction factors for installation damage, creep and their combined effect were computed. The main aim of the paper was to assess how the long-term response of the geosynthetics was influenced by installation damage and whether it would be necessary to update current design approaches. The installation damage affected the mechanical response of both geosynthetics; important strength reductions were observed, particularly for the most severe installation conditions. The results indicate that, contrary to what has been reported in the literature, the creep rupture response of the geotextile changed after installation damage. When tested under similar creep loads (fraction of the sample tensile strength), both geosynthetics exhibited reduced potential for creep rupture and smaller strains at the end of primary creep. Changes in stiffness were less important than those for strength, for both short- and long-term response. There was synergy between installation damage and creep; the traditional approach to design was unsafe for the geotextile and slightly conservative for the geogrid.
Geosynthetics, installation damage, tensile strength, creep, creep rupture, isochronous curves, reduction factors, synergy, stiffness
1072-6349
98-117
Fernandes De Pinho Lopes, Margarida
b7e5f7d6-90d8-48cc-b991-0495445fcea4
Paula, Antonio Miguel
0dbe22f4-a8ce-4e0e-b677-52d9abe59348
Lopes, Maria de Lurdes
e613dbe9-6f51-4aff-9c3b-20363ff70d86
Fernandes De Pinho Lopes, Margarida
b7e5f7d6-90d8-48cc-b991-0495445fcea4
Paula, Antonio Miguel
0dbe22f4-a8ce-4e0e-b677-52d9abe59348
Lopes, Maria de Lurdes
e613dbe9-6f51-4aff-9c3b-20363ff70d86

Fernandes De Pinho Lopes, Margarida, Paula, Antonio Miguel and Lopes, Maria de Lurdes (2018) Long-term response and design of two geosynthetics: effect of field installation damage. Geosynthetics International, 25 (1), 98-117. (doi:10.1680/jgein.17.00036).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper contributes to understanding how installation damage of geosynthetics influences their long-term response and design. A geotextile and a geogrid were exhumed after installation under real conditions; their long-term tensile behaviour was investigated using conventional creep and creep rupture tests. Reduction factors for installation damage, creep and their combined effect were computed. The main aim of the paper was to assess how the long-term response of the geosynthetics was influenced by installation damage and whether it would be necessary to update current design approaches. The installation damage affected the mechanical response of both geosynthetics; important strength reductions were observed, particularly for the most severe installation conditions. The results indicate that, contrary to what has been reported in the literature, the creep rupture response of the geotextile changed after installation damage. When tested under similar creep loads (fraction of the sample tensile strength), both geosynthetics exhibited reduced potential for creep rupture and smaller strains at the end of primary creep. Changes in stiffness were less important than those for strength, for both short- and long-term response. There was synergy between installation damage and creep; the traditional approach to design was unsafe for the geotextile and slightly conservative for the geogrid.

Text
2017_GI_MPL_AMP_MLL_accepted - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 24 October 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 October 2017
Published date: 1 March 2018
Keywords: Geosynthetics, installation damage, tensile strength, creep, creep rupture, isochronous curves, reduction factors, synergy, stiffness

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 415221
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/415221
ISSN: 1072-6349
PURE UUID: cfa77578-1241-4f22-8d72-0f08f0f7df80
ORCID for Margarida Fernandes De Pinho Lopes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0808-6307

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Nov 2017 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Antonio Miguel Paula
Author: Maria de Lurdes Lopes

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×