Climate change and justice
Climate change and justice
Understanding the complex set of processes collected under the heading of climate change represents a considerable scientific challenge. But it also raises important challenges for our best moral theories. For instance, in assessing the risks that climate change poses, we face profound questions about how to weigh the respective harms it may inflict on current and future generations, as well as on humans and other species. We also face difficult questions about how to act in conditions of uncertainty, in which at least some of the consequences of climate change—and of various human interventions to adapt to or mitigate it—are difficult to predict fully. Even if we agree that mitigating climate change is morally required, there is room for disagreement about the precise extent to which it ought to be mitigated (insofar as there is room for underlying disagreement about the level of temperature rises that are morally permissible). Finally, once we determine which actions to take to reduce or avoid climate change, we face the normative question of who ought to bear the costs of those actions, as well as the costs associated with any climate change that nevertheless comes to pass.
Armstrong, Christopher
2fbfa0a3-9183-4562-9370-0f6441df90d2
2018
Armstrong, Christopher
2fbfa0a3-9183-4562-9370-0f6441df90d2
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
Understanding the complex set of processes collected under the heading of climate change represents a considerable scientific challenge. But it also raises important challenges for our best moral theories. For instance, in assessing the risks that climate change poses, we face profound questions about how to weigh the respective harms it may inflict on current and future generations, as well as on humans and other species. We also face difficult questions about how to act in conditions of uncertainty, in which at least some of the consequences of climate change—and of various human interventions to adapt to or mitigate it—are difficult to predict fully. Even if we agree that mitigating climate change is morally required, there is room for disagreement about the precise extent to which it ought to be mitigated (insofar as there is room for underlying disagreement about the level of temperature rises that are morally permissible). Finally, once we determine which actions to take to reduce or avoid climate change, we face the normative question of who ought to bear the costs of those actions, as well as the costs associated with any climate change that nevertheless comes to pass.
Text
Climate Change OREP chapter
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 November 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 November 2017
Published date: 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 415257
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/415257
PURE UUID: a8fbb742-dd13-44f8-be8d-c19edadd4852
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Nov 2017 17:30
Last modified: 25 Mar 2025 02:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Editor:
William R. Thompson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics