Motivational interviewing in respiratory therapy: What do clinicians need to make it part of routine care? A qualitative study
Motivational interviewing in respiratory therapy: What do clinicians need to make it part of routine care? A qualitative study
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a method for building motivation for behaviour change that has potential for use in respiratory contexts. There is a paucity of published research exploring the feasibility of this intervention from the clinicians’ perspective. This study aimed to explore respiratory clinicians' views of MI: Is it perceived as useful? Could it be integrated into practice? What training would be required to make it part of routine care? Nine respiratory clinicians attended a one-day MI workshop and a semi-structured face-to-face interview two weeks later. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with thematic analysis. Four main themes are presented—1) MI’s suitability for use in respiratory contexts: participants saw potential in using MI to motivate their patients to engage with prescribed respiratory interventions, such as increased physical activity. Those who experimented with new skills post-workshop were encouraged by patient responsiveness and outcomes. 2) MI’s relationship with routine clinical practice: some believed they already used elements of MI, but most participants felt MI was fundamentally 'different' to their normal style of working. 3) Implementation issues: additional time would need to be made available to enable an appropriate depth of conversation. 4) Training issues: Participants sensed the complexity of MI could make it difficult to learn and that it would take them time to become competent. On-going supervision was perceived as necessary. One key challenge identified was how to suppress behaviours that are antithetical to MI. These findings lend support to the feasibility of using MI in respiratory contexts such as pulmonary rehabilitation programmes, but highlight implementation and training issues that would need to be overcome. The insights have informed the development of another study, testing the effect of a tailored training package on MI skill, specifically for respiratory clinicians delivering pulmonary rehabilitation programmes.
1-15
Shannon, Robert
6dcecf24-62dc-43fb-90b9-f3f95a6fd2c1
Donovan-Hall, Margaret
5f138055-2162-4982-846c-5c92411055e0
Bruton, Anne
9f8b6076-6558-4d99-b7c8-72b03796ed95
Shannon, Robert
6dcecf24-62dc-43fb-90b9-f3f95a6fd2c1
Donovan-Hall, Margaret
5f138055-2162-4982-846c-5c92411055e0
Bruton, Anne
9f8b6076-6558-4d99-b7c8-72b03796ed95
Shannon, Robert, Donovan-Hall, Margaret and Bruton, Anne
(2017)
Motivational interviewing in respiratory therapy: What do clinicians need to make it part of routine care? A qualitative study.
PLoS ONE, 12 (10), , [e0187335].
(doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187335).
Abstract
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a method for building motivation for behaviour change that has potential for use in respiratory contexts. There is a paucity of published research exploring the feasibility of this intervention from the clinicians’ perspective. This study aimed to explore respiratory clinicians' views of MI: Is it perceived as useful? Could it be integrated into practice? What training would be required to make it part of routine care? Nine respiratory clinicians attended a one-day MI workshop and a semi-structured face-to-face interview two weeks later. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with thematic analysis. Four main themes are presented—1) MI’s suitability for use in respiratory contexts: participants saw potential in using MI to motivate their patients to engage with prescribed respiratory interventions, such as increased physical activity. Those who experimented with new skills post-workshop were encouraged by patient responsiveness and outcomes. 2) MI’s relationship with routine clinical practice: some believed they already used elements of MI, but most participants felt MI was fundamentally 'different' to their normal style of working. 3) Implementation issues: additional time would need to be made available to enable an appropriate depth of conversation. 4) Training issues: Participants sensed the complexity of MI could make it difficult to learn and that it would take them time to become competent. On-going supervision was perceived as necessary. One key challenge identified was how to suppress behaviours that are antithetical to MI. These findings lend support to the feasibility of using MI in respiratory contexts such as pulmonary rehabilitation programmes, but highlight implementation and training issues that would need to be overcome. The insights have informed the development of another study, testing the effect of a tailored training package on MI skill, specifically for respiratory clinicians delivering pulmonary rehabilitation programmes.
Text
Motivational interviewing in respiratory therapy_accepted version
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Registered users only
Request a copy
Text
S1Table
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Registered users only
Request a copy
Text
S1Text
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Registered users only
Request a copy
Text
file
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 18 October 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 31 October 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 415326
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/415326
PURE UUID: c117fc08-2a9f-4b0d-aa7f-476508096cd0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Nov 2017 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Anne Bruton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics