The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

History, drawing and power: essays towards reflexive methodological pluralism in sociology

History, drawing and power: essays towards reflexive methodological pluralism in sociology
History, drawing and power: essays towards reflexive methodological pluralism in sociology
There is growing consensus around pluralism as the orientation of the social sciences in general, and British sociology in particular, towards research methodology. However, the profession of methodological pluralism, is not always apparent in research practice. This thesis seeks to explore the dimensions of a truly pluralistic sociology. It takes as its starting point Pierre Bourdieu’s central methodological arguments for pluralism and reflexivity in all aspects of research practice, which involves using “all the techniques that are relevant and practically usable, given the definition of the object and the practical conditions of data collection” (Bourdieu and Wacquant, 1992, p. 227). Each paper explores the implications of this mandate for a different facet of research methodology.

The first paper examines the social survey method in the UK and the US and its relationship to the social world that it sought to account for. Through a secondary review of historical literature, I observe how the social problems that demanded explanation, practical/technological constraints and advances, and the cultural climate shaped the development of the method, with the processes of institutionalisation, professionalisation and economisation shaping its trajectory in recent history. Methodological history, I argue, enables survey practitioners to reflectively appraise the idiosyncrasies of the method’s development, current practices and future prospects.

The second paper problematises the compartmentalisation of sociology’s diverse methodological repertoire within the data collection stage of research. I explore how a creative, multi-modal method – storyboarding – can serve as a useful tool to the researcher in the pre-empirical processes of conceptualisation and research design. This is exemplified through examining the challenge of operationalising trust. Using Bourdieu’s notion of the construction of the sociological object, I argue that the use of creative, visual/multimodal methods serves to highlight where conceptual slippages, suggests new aspects of that concept and approaches to its investigation, and facilitates the researcher’s reflexive exploration of their own relation to the object of research.

For Sociology to achieve genuine methodological pluralism, it is not sufficient to apply a wide range of methods: the implications of those methods in practice must also be continually questioned. The third paper argues that there lacks a sufficient theoretical account of the micro-dynamics of power in focus group discussions, while much of the standard guidance on their conduct serves to control interactions in a way that sanitises them of these dynamics. I exemplify an approach using Bourdieu’s concept of fields to address these deficiencies, based on focus group discussions which used photo elicitation to examine national identity among South Sudanese diaspora in the UK.

These papers indicate that the attitude of ‘relentless self-questioning’ that Bourdieu describes as reflexivity is key to the achievement of pluralism. Pluralism sits in the tension between a permissive view as to what constitutes knowledge, and the constraints of methodological reflexivity and ethics: issues that are bound up in the relationship between the researcher and the researched.
University of Southampton
Ayrton, Rachel Elizabeth
3d3e7f99-19f3-4c45-9abd-38ed52f67ae9
Ayrton, Rachel Elizabeth
3d3e7f99-19f3-4c45-9abd-38ed52f67ae9
Madise, Nyovani J
2ea2fbcc-50da-4696-a0a5-2fe01db63d8c
Edwards, Rosalind
e43912c0-f149-4457-81a9-9c4e00a4bb42

Ayrton, Rachel Elizabeth (2017) History, drawing and power: essays towards reflexive methodological pluralism in sociology. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 155pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

There is growing consensus around pluralism as the orientation of the social sciences in general, and British sociology in particular, towards research methodology. However, the profession of methodological pluralism, is not always apparent in research practice. This thesis seeks to explore the dimensions of a truly pluralistic sociology. It takes as its starting point Pierre Bourdieu’s central methodological arguments for pluralism and reflexivity in all aspects of research practice, which involves using “all the techniques that are relevant and practically usable, given the definition of the object and the practical conditions of data collection” (Bourdieu and Wacquant, 1992, p. 227). Each paper explores the implications of this mandate for a different facet of research methodology.

The first paper examines the social survey method in the UK and the US and its relationship to the social world that it sought to account for. Through a secondary review of historical literature, I observe how the social problems that demanded explanation, practical/technological constraints and advances, and the cultural climate shaped the development of the method, with the processes of institutionalisation, professionalisation and economisation shaping its trajectory in recent history. Methodological history, I argue, enables survey practitioners to reflectively appraise the idiosyncrasies of the method’s development, current practices and future prospects.

The second paper problematises the compartmentalisation of sociology’s diverse methodological repertoire within the data collection stage of research. I explore how a creative, multi-modal method – storyboarding – can serve as a useful tool to the researcher in the pre-empirical processes of conceptualisation and research design. This is exemplified through examining the challenge of operationalising trust. Using Bourdieu’s notion of the construction of the sociological object, I argue that the use of creative, visual/multimodal methods serves to highlight where conceptual slippages, suggests new aspects of that concept and approaches to its investigation, and facilitates the researcher’s reflexive exploration of their own relation to the object of research.

For Sociology to achieve genuine methodological pluralism, it is not sufficient to apply a wide range of methods: the implications of those methods in practice must also be continually questioned. The third paper argues that there lacks a sufficient theoretical account of the micro-dynamics of power in focus group discussions, while much of the standard guidance on their conduct serves to control interactions in a way that sanitises them of these dynamics. I exemplify an approach using Bourdieu’s concept of fields to address these deficiencies, based on focus group discussions which used photo elicitation to examine national identity among South Sudanese diaspora in the UK.

These papers indicate that the attitude of ‘relentless self-questioning’ that Bourdieu describes as reflexivity is key to the achievement of pluralism. Pluralism sits in the tension between a permissive view as to what constitutes knowledge, and the constraints of methodological reflexivity and ethics: issues that are bound up in the relationship between the researcher and the researched.

Text
RachelAyrton History Drawing and Power FINAL 26Sep17 - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (2MB)

More information

Published date: April 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 415350
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/415350
PURE UUID: 1b59458a-259e-4606-9051-19bbcfbfd168
ORCID for Rachel Elizabeth Ayrton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7907-689X
ORCID for Nyovani J Madise: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2813-5295
ORCID for Rosalind Edwards: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3512-9029

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Nov 2017 17:30
Last modified: 24 May 2019 00:24

Export record

Contributors

Thesis advisor: Nyovani J Madise ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Rosalind Edwards ORCID iD

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×