Eligibility screening in evidence synthesis of environmental management topics
Eligibility screening in evidence synthesis of environmental management topics
The eligibility screening step of a systematic review or systematic map (sometimes referred to as ‘study selection’, ‘evidence selection’ or ‘inclusion screening’) determines the scope of the evidence that may answer the review or map question. Eligibility screening involves the development, testing and application of eligibility criteria (inclusion and exclusion criteria) by an evidence synthesis review team, based on methods pre-specified in the review or map protocol. Some parts of the process require judgement, meaning that consistent and transparent reporting of the eligibility criteria and the process for applying them are essential in order to reduce the risk of introducing errors or bias. The existing Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE) Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in Environmental Management (version 4.2, March 2013) give relatively limited guidance on how to conduct eligibility screening. In this paper we provide more in-depth information on good practice methods for this step of evidence synthesis, based on a critical consideration of existing guidance and current practice. Our aim is to provide recommendations to support those conducting CEE systematic reviews or systematic maps for environmental management questions; however, the methods we describe are generic and should be broadly applicable across a wide range of environmental research topics.
Frampton, Geoff K.
26c6163c-3428-45b8-b8b9-92091ff6c69f
Livoreil, Barbara
e6b03480-8c39-4e71-ab81-167b7f416957
Petrokofsky, Gillian
10c2caf2-52dc-4e96-83e9-4094210e7d99
December 2017
Frampton, Geoff K.
26c6163c-3428-45b8-b8b9-92091ff6c69f
Livoreil, Barbara
e6b03480-8c39-4e71-ab81-167b7f416957
Petrokofsky, Gillian
10c2caf2-52dc-4e96-83e9-4094210e7d99
Frampton, Geoff K., Livoreil, Barbara and Petrokofsky, Gillian
(2017)
Eligibility screening in evidence synthesis of environmental management topics.
Environmental Evidence, 6 (1), [27].
(doi:10.1186/s13750-017-0102-2).
Abstract
The eligibility screening step of a systematic review or systematic map (sometimes referred to as ‘study selection’, ‘evidence selection’ or ‘inclusion screening’) determines the scope of the evidence that may answer the review or map question. Eligibility screening involves the development, testing and application of eligibility criteria (inclusion and exclusion criteria) by an evidence synthesis review team, based on methods pre-specified in the review or map protocol. Some parts of the process require judgement, meaning that consistent and transparent reporting of the eligibility criteria and the process for applying them are essential in order to reduce the risk of introducing errors or bias. The existing Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE) Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in Environmental Management (version 4.2, March 2013) give relatively limited guidance on how to conduct eligibility screening. In this paper we provide more in-depth information on good practice methods for this step of evidence synthesis, based on a critical consideration of existing guidance and current practice. Our aim is to provide recommendations to support those conducting CEE systematic reviews or systematic maps for environmental management questions; however, the methods we describe are generic and should be broadly applicable across a wide range of environmental research topics.
Text
s13750-017-0102-2
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 30 August 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 September 2017
Published date: December 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 416075
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/416075
ISSN: 2047-2382
PURE UUID: 1cbaddf8-06bb-4ca3-83b0-4636bc7f953d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Dec 2017 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Barbara Livoreil
Author:
Gillian Petrokofsky
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics