Land Ahoy! Understanding submarine command and control during the completion of inshore operations
Land Ahoy! Understanding submarine command and control during the completion of inshore operations
Objective: The aim of this study was to use multiple command teams to provide empirical evidence for understanding communication flow, information pertinence, and tasks undertaken in a submarine control room when completing higher- and lower-demand inshore operation (INSO) scenarios.
Background: The focus of submarine operations has changed, and submarines are increasingly required to operate in costal littoral zones. However, submarine command team performance during INSO is not well understood, particularly from a sociotechnical systems perspective.
Method: A submarine control-room simulator was built. The creation of networked workstations allowed a team of nine operators to perform tasks completed by submarine command teams during INSO. The Event Analysis of Systematic Teamwork method was used to model the social, task, and information networks and to describe command team performance. Ten teams were recruited for the study, affording statistical comparisons of how command-team roles and level of demand affected performance.
Results: Results indicated that the submarine command-team members are required to rapidly integrate sonar and visual data as the periscope is used, periodically, in a “duck-and-run” fashion, to maintain covertness. The fusion of such information is primarily completed by the operations officer (OPSO), with this operator experiencing significantly greater demand than any other operator.
Conclusion: The OPSO was a bottleneck in the command team when completing INSO, experiencing similar load in both scenarios, suggesting that the command team may benefit from data synthesis tasks being more evenly distributed within the command team.
Application:
The work can inform future control-room design and command-team ways of working by identifying bottlenecks in terms of information and task flow between operators.
submarine, teamwork, communications, networks
1263-1288
Roberts, Aaron P.J.
a2fb35d9-a42f-4a07-848d-01cecae9d893
Stanton, Neville A.
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Fay, Daniel
7db57379-3af4-4554-9358-717ffec9df48
1 December 2017
Roberts, Aaron P.J.
a2fb35d9-a42f-4a07-848d-01cecae9d893
Stanton, Neville A.
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Fay, Daniel
7db57379-3af4-4554-9358-717ffec9df48
Roberts, Aaron P.J., Stanton, Neville A. and Fay, Daniel
(2017)
Land Ahoy! Understanding submarine command and control during the completion of inshore operations.
Human Factors, 59 (8), .
(doi:10.1177/0018720817731678).
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to use multiple command teams to provide empirical evidence for understanding communication flow, information pertinence, and tasks undertaken in a submarine control room when completing higher- and lower-demand inshore operation (INSO) scenarios.
Background: The focus of submarine operations has changed, and submarines are increasingly required to operate in costal littoral zones. However, submarine command team performance during INSO is not well understood, particularly from a sociotechnical systems perspective.
Method: A submarine control-room simulator was built. The creation of networked workstations allowed a team of nine operators to perform tasks completed by submarine command teams during INSO. The Event Analysis of Systematic Teamwork method was used to model the social, task, and information networks and to describe command team performance. Ten teams were recruited for the study, affording statistical comparisons of how command-team roles and level of demand affected performance.
Results: Results indicated that the submarine command-team members are required to rapidly integrate sonar and visual data as the periscope is used, periodically, in a “duck-and-run” fashion, to maintain covertness. The fusion of such information is primarily completed by the operations officer (OPSO), with this operator experiencing significantly greater demand than any other operator.
Conclusion: The OPSO was a bottleneck in the command team when completing INSO, experiencing similar load in both scenarios, suggesting that the command team may benefit from data synthesis tasks being more evenly distributed within the command team.
Application:
The work can inform future control-room design and command-team ways of working by identifying bottlenecks in terms of information and task flow between operators.
Text
Land Ahoy (2)
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 27 July 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 October 2017
Published date: 1 December 2017
Keywords:
submarine, teamwork, communications, networks
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 416267
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/416267
ISSN: 0018-7208
PURE UUID: a26d83b4-63f5-4789-8c1c-3c5eb2d61d02
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Dec 2017 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics