The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’

Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’
Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is key to the robust environmental management of industrial projects; it is used to anticipate, assess and reduce environmental and social risks of a project. It is instrumental in project planning and execution, and often required for financing and regulatory approval to be granted. The International Seabed Authority currently requires an EIA for deep-sea mining (DSM) in areas beyond national jurisdiction (the Area), but the existing regulations present only a portion of a robust EIA process. This article presents an ideal EIA process for DSM, drawing upon the application of EIA from allied industries. It contains screening, scoping and assessment phases, along with the development of an environmental management plan. It also includes external review by experts, stakeholder consultation, and regulatory review. Lessons learned from application of EIA elsewhere are discussed in relation to DSM, including the integration of EIA into UK domestic law, and the reception of EIAs prepared for seabed ore extraction in the Exclusive Economic Zones of New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. Finally, four main challenges of implementing the EIA process to DSM in the Area are presented: 1) EIA process for DSM needs to incorporate mechanisms to address uncertainty; 2) detailed requirements for the EIA process phases should be made clear; 3) mechanisms are needed to ensure that the EIA influences decision making; and, 4) the EIA process requires substantial input and involvement from the regulator.
0308597X
194-202
Durden, Jennifer M.
d7101246-b76b-44bc-8956-8ca4ae62ae1f
Lallier, Laura E.
c2d01423-5635-44c6-9319-92944c292b0f
Murphy, Kevin
0ae3e4a7-ba88-4867-aa4a-a394ac59d5b8
Jaeckel, Aline
96ef7ac7-082f-42a7-8639-4ece4597624f
Gjerde, Kristina
f5e81464-9cf2-43c7-8945-29ba626ab8cd
Jones, Daniel O.b.
44fc07b3-5fb7-4bf5-9cec-78c78022613a
Durden, Jennifer M.
d7101246-b76b-44bc-8956-8ca4ae62ae1f
Lallier, Laura E.
c2d01423-5635-44c6-9319-92944c292b0f
Murphy, Kevin
0ae3e4a7-ba88-4867-aa4a-a394ac59d5b8
Jaeckel, Aline
96ef7ac7-082f-42a7-8639-4ece4597624f
Gjerde, Kristina
f5e81464-9cf2-43c7-8945-29ba626ab8cd
Jones, Daniel O.b.
44fc07b3-5fb7-4bf5-9cec-78c78022613a

Durden, Jennifer M., Lallier, Laura E., Murphy, Kevin, Jaeckel, Aline, Gjerde, Kristina and Jones, Daniel O.b. (2018) Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’. Marine Policy, 87, 194-202. (doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is key to the robust environmental management of industrial projects; it is used to anticipate, assess and reduce environmental and social risks of a project. It is instrumental in project planning and execution, and often required for financing and regulatory approval to be granted. The International Seabed Authority currently requires an EIA for deep-sea mining (DSM) in areas beyond national jurisdiction (the Area), but the existing regulations present only a portion of a robust EIA process. This article presents an ideal EIA process for DSM, drawing upon the application of EIA from allied industries. It contains screening, scoping and assessment phases, along with the development of an environmental management plan. It also includes external review by experts, stakeholder consultation, and regulatory review. Lessons learned from application of EIA elsewhere are discussed in relation to DSM, including the integration of EIA into UK domestic law, and the reception of EIAs prepared for seabed ore extraction in the Exclusive Economic Zones of New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. Finally, four main challenges of implementing the EIA process to DSM in the Area are presented: 1) EIA process for DSM needs to incorporate mechanisms to address uncertainty; 2) detailed requirements for the EIA process phases should be made clear; 3) mechanisms are needed to ensure that the EIA influences decision making; and, 4) the EIA process requires substantial input and involvement from the regulator.

Text 1-s2.0-S0308597X17305316-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (374kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 October 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 November 2017
Published date: 1 January 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 416296
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/416296
ISSN: 0308597X
PURE UUID: 0f02629d-e807-4897-ba91-a5e109d01303

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Dec 2017 17:30
Last modified: 03 Jan 2018 17:30

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×