The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Bone apparent and material densities examined by cone beam computed tomography and the Archimedes technique: comparison of the two methods and their results

Bone apparent and material densities examined by cone beam computed tomography and the Archimedes technique: comparison of the two methods and their results
Bone apparent and material densities examined by cone beam computed tomography and the Archimedes technique: comparison of the two methods and their results
An understanding of bone apparent and material densities and how they vary within bone at the organ level is of great interest in the understanding of degenerative bone conditions and for biomedical engineering applications. The densities of bone tissue have been shown to appreciably influence the mechanical competency of bone tissue. In order to assess the density of bone in the body, it is important to ensure that the parameters being measured in vivo are truly representative of the real values that have been measured in vitro. To assess the densities of bone across the entire spectrum of available porosities, 112 samples from an elephant femur were assessed using the Archimedes method (water displacement) and by micro-computed tomography (μ-CT). Comparisons were drawn between the two methods to determine if the densities calculated by μ-CT were representative of physically measured densities. The results showed that the apparent densities measured over the entire spectrum were very similar but varied in the intermediate regions of bone tissue, probably due to an increased presence of osteoid, increased remodelling or experimental error as these type of bone is known for the presence of regions of closed cell geometry in the cancellous architecture. It could be argued that the measurements taken by μ-CT are more reliable of bone density values for the mineralised regions of bone as the threshold is defined with respect to the absorption of x-rays by the mineral. By contrast, the Archimedes method thresholds everything with a density value above that of the surrounding medium, 1 (g cm-3) for water, and hence it is more sensitive to the presence of osteoid, soft collagenous matrix and epithelial cell layers. Further research is required to optimise the parameters of scanning methods for the structural properties of different bone tissue porosities, which hopefully in turn will be able to provide a basis for the development of predictive remodelling models.
2297-3079
1-9
Adams, George
4336e45e-fa34-46e2-a7ab-0aa613e47551
Cook, Richard
06f8322d-81be-4f82-9326-19e55541c78f
Hutchinson, John
f1b2487d-a4af-45b1-985f-44f1829d4a94
Zioupos, Peter
70120765-7396-4e86-bb9e-9c4d64c43294
Adams, George
4336e45e-fa34-46e2-a7ab-0aa613e47551
Cook, Richard
06f8322d-81be-4f82-9326-19e55541c78f
Hutchinson, John
f1b2487d-a4af-45b1-985f-44f1829d4a94
Zioupos, Peter
70120765-7396-4e86-bb9e-9c4d64c43294

Adams, George, Cook, Richard, Hutchinson, John and Zioupos, Peter (2018) Bone apparent and material densities examined by cone beam computed tomography and the Archimedes technique: comparison of the two methods and their results. Frontiers in Mechancial Engineering, 3 (23), 1-9. (doi:10.3389/fmech.2017.00023).

Record type: Article

Abstract

An understanding of bone apparent and material densities and how they vary within bone at the organ level is of great interest in the understanding of degenerative bone conditions and for biomedical engineering applications. The densities of bone tissue have been shown to appreciably influence the mechanical competency of bone tissue. In order to assess the density of bone in the body, it is important to ensure that the parameters being measured in vivo are truly representative of the real values that have been measured in vitro. To assess the densities of bone across the entire spectrum of available porosities, 112 samples from an elephant femur were assessed using the Archimedes method (water displacement) and by micro-computed tomography (μ-CT). Comparisons were drawn between the two methods to determine if the densities calculated by μ-CT were representative of physically measured densities. The results showed that the apparent densities measured over the entire spectrum were very similar but varied in the intermediate regions of bone tissue, probably due to an increased presence of osteoid, increased remodelling or experimental error as these type of bone is known for the presence of regions of closed cell geometry in the cancellous architecture. It could be argued that the measurements taken by μ-CT are more reliable of bone density values for the mineralised regions of bone as the threshold is defined with respect to the absorption of x-rays by the mineral. By contrast, the Archimedes method thresholds everything with a density value above that of the surrounding medium, 1 (g cm-3) for water, and hence it is more sensitive to the presence of osteoid, soft collagenous matrix and epithelial cell layers. Further research is required to optimise the parameters of scanning methods for the structural properties of different bone tissue porosities, which hopefully in turn will be able to provide a basis for the development of predictive remodelling models.

Other
Frontiers Density Manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Download (3MB)
Text
fmech-03-00023 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 December 2017
Published date: 5 February 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 416658
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/416658
ISSN: 2297-3079
PURE UUID: 5cb2a493-77d5-45a6-8601-986e17a639ab
ORCID for Richard Cook: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2468-5820

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jan 2018 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: George Adams
Author: Richard Cook ORCID iD
Author: John Hutchinson
Author: Peter Zioupos

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×