Antenatal vaccination against Group B streptococcus: Attitudes of pregnant women and healthcare professionals in the UK to participation in clinical trials and routine implementation
Antenatal vaccination against Group B streptococcus: Attitudes of pregnant women and healthcare professionals in the UK to participation in clinical trials and routine implementation
Introduction
Maternal vaccination is increasingly part of antenatal care in the UK and worldwide. Trials of Group B streptococcus vaccines are ongoing. This study investigated the attitudes of pregnant women and healthcare professionals towards antenatal vaccination, both in routine care and a clinical trial setting.
Material and methods
Survey of 269 pregnant women, 273 midwives/obstetricians and 97 neonatal doctors across seven sites in the UK assessing attitudes towards antenatal vaccinations, knowledge of Group B streptococcus, a hypothetical Group B streptococcus vaccine, and participation in clinical vaccine trials.
Results
68% of pregnant women intended to receive a vaccine during their current pregnancy (183/269) and 43% (of all respondents, 115/269) reported they would be very/fairly likely to accept a vaccine against Group B streptococcus despite only 29% (55/269) knowing what Group B streptococcus was. This increased to 69% after additional information about Group B streptococcus was provided. Twenty-four percent of pregnant women reported they would be likely to take part in a clinical trial of an unlicensed Group B streptococcus vaccine. Fifty-nine percent of maternity professionals and 74% of neonatologists would be likely to recommend participation in a Group B streptococcus vaccine trial to women, with the vast majority (>99%) willing to be involved in such a study. Incentives to take part cited by pregnant women included extra antenatal scans and the opportunity to be tested for Group B streptococcus.
Conclusion
Pregnant women and healthcare professionals were open to the idea of an antenatal Group B streptococcus vaccine and involvement in clinical trials of such a vaccine. Education and support from midwives would be key to successful implementation.
McQuaid, Fiona
0809796e-2b46-4bee-86ce-30725dbc99e8
Jones, Christine E.
48229079-8b58-4dcb-8374-d9481fe7b426
Stevens, Zoe
63fe4e94-7b55-4a94-bd50-77c607646528
Meddaugh, Gretchen
98552411-774d-4f3a-9b1b-658f6cf6f360
O'Sullivan, Catherine
afcd948e-ff0e-4663-b5f7-403e8d4372e7
Donaldson, Beverly
90280728-49aa-4644-810a-5fcf7611df8c
Hughes, Rhona
89850d7b-e7ea-4f32-9b34-005b13ce3fc9
Ford, Carolyn
37cbe842-f1ab-49f1-8805-8e0cc68d050c
Finn, Adam
59ac74fa-55a6-448d-9e19-9dd2f4654d4b
Faust, Saul N.
f97df780-9f9b-418e-b349-7adf63e150c1
Gbesemete, Diane
2543380e-16b0-42b4-9d0f-88421ac33106
Bedford, Helen
f6fcbbb5-4338-42c5-9686-038a8ec6dac7
Hughes, Stephen
3e14ee79-db73-4e5a-8746-c7f3f30bfd84
Varghese, Anu Susan
583e666a-0b3b-46be-a3cf-a2ef028d1cc6
Heath, Paul T.
b9b6e0e4-6bd0-4c16-b9f6-607b00137fe4
Snape, Matthew D.
ea21c8b9-e907-4914-9052-ae9eb56f54d7
McQuaid, Fiona
0809796e-2b46-4bee-86ce-30725dbc99e8
Jones, Christine E.
48229079-8b58-4dcb-8374-d9481fe7b426
Stevens, Zoe
63fe4e94-7b55-4a94-bd50-77c607646528
Meddaugh, Gretchen
98552411-774d-4f3a-9b1b-658f6cf6f360
O'Sullivan, Catherine
afcd948e-ff0e-4663-b5f7-403e8d4372e7
Donaldson, Beverly
90280728-49aa-4644-810a-5fcf7611df8c
Hughes, Rhona
89850d7b-e7ea-4f32-9b34-005b13ce3fc9
Ford, Carolyn
37cbe842-f1ab-49f1-8805-8e0cc68d050c
Finn, Adam
59ac74fa-55a6-448d-9e19-9dd2f4654d4b
Faust, Saul N.
f97df780-9f9b-418e-b349-7adf63e150c1
Gbesemete, Diane
2543380e-16b0-42b4-9d0f-88421ac33106
Bedford, Helen
f6fcbbb5-4338-42c5-9686-038a8ec6dac7
Hughes, Stephen
3e14ee79-db73-4e5a-8746-c7f3f30bfd84
Varghese, Anu Susan
583e666a-0b3b-46be-a3cf-a2ef028d1cc6
Heath, Paul T.
b9b6e0e4-6bd0-4c16-b9f6-607b00137fe4
Snape, Matthew D.
ea21c8b9-e907-4914-9052-ae9eb56f54d7
McQuaid, Fiona, Jones, Christine E., Stevens, Zoe, Meddaugh, Gretchen, O'Sullivan, Catherine, Donaldson, Beverly, Hughes, Rhona, Ford, Carolyn, Finn, Adam, Faust, Saul N., Gbesemete, Diane, Bedford, Helen, Hughes, Stephen, Varghese, Anu Susan, Heath, Paul T. and Snape, Matthew D.
(2018)
Antenatal vaccination against Group B streptococcus: Attitudes of pregnant women and healthcare professionals in the UK to participation in clinical trials and routine implementation.
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.
(doi:10.1111/aogs.13288).
Abstract
Introduction
Maternal vaccination is increasingly part of antenatal care in the UK and worldwide. Trials of Group B streptococcus vaccines are ongoing. This study investigated the attitudes of pregnant women and healthcare professionals towards antenatal vaccination, both in routine care and a clinical trial setting.
Material and methods
Survey of 269 pregnant women, 273 midwives/obstetricians and 97 neonatal doctors across seven sites in the UK assessing attitudes towards antenatal vaccinations, knowledge of Group B streptococcus, a hypothetical Group B streptococcus vaccine, and participation in clinical vaccine trials.
Results
68% of pregnant women intended to receive a vaccine during their current pregnancy (183/269) and 43% (of all respondents, 115/269) reported they would be very/fairly likely to accept a vaccine against Group B streptococcus despite only 29% (55/269) knowing what Group B streptococcus was. This increased to 69% after additional information about Group B streptococcus was provided. Twenty-four percent of pregnant women reported they would be likely to take part in a clinical trial of an unlicensed Group B streptococcus vaccine. Fifty-nine percent of maternity professionals and 74% of neonatologists would be likely to recommend participation in a Group B streptococcus vaccine trial to women, with the vast majority (>99%) willing to be involved in such a study. Incentives to take part cited by pregnant women included extra antenatal scans and the opportunity to be tested for Group B streptococcus.
Conclusion
Pregnant women and healthcare professionals were open to the idea of an antenatal Group B streptococcus vaccine and involvement in clinical trials of such a vaccine. Education and support from midwives would be key to successful implementation.
Text
McQuaid_et_al-2018-Acta_Obstetricia_et_Gynecologica_Scandinavica
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 December 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 January 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 416713
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/416713
ISSN: 0001-6349
PURE UUID: 1fa99278-ffd8-43f5-abe4-10422c1a072f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jan 2018 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Fiona McQuaid
Author:
Zoe Stevens
Author:
Gretchen Meddaugh
Author:
Catherine O'Sullivan
Author:
Beverly Donaldson
Author:
Rhona Hughes
Author:
Carolyn Ford
Author:
Adam Finn
Author:
Diane Gbesemete
Author:
Helen Bedford
Author:
Stephen Hughes
Author:
Anu Susan Varghese
Author:
Paul T. Heath
Author:
Matthew D. Snape
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics