The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Caught in the eye of the storm: explaining the lack of engagement with methylphenidate drug holidays in children with ADHD

Caught in the eye of the storm: explaining the lack of engagement with methylphenidate drug holidays in children with ADHD
Caught in the eye of the storm: explaining the lack of engagement with methylphenidate drug holidays in children with ADHD
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can be managed medically with stimulant medication such as methylphenidate. Although effective, the long-term impact of methylphenidate on children’s developing brains is unknown and serious side-effects include growth retardation. UK guidelines recommend doctorinitiated 2-week breaks from stimulants after two years of prescribing to test the continuing need for medication [1]. Locally too, shared-care arrangements between consultants at Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (BHFT) and General Practitioners (GPs) encourage both groups to consider and discuss these drug holidays with parents of children prescribed methylphenidate. But evidence suggested little engagement with this practice. Our aim was to understand and explain why methylphenidate drug holidays rarely take place in actual practice. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) consultants (n = 8), GPs (n = 8), and teachers (n = 3) who deal with children with ADHD in Berkshire, UK. Both CAMHS consultants and teachers were approached via email through a secondary source; GPs were approached through the post. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and then analyzed using Grounded theory methodology[2]. Future parent interviews are planned as part of the ongoing validation process. This work was approved by the University of Reading Research Ethics Committee, BHFT R&D office and the Thames Valley Primary Care Research Partnership. Five main categories emerged from primary analyses during this study and these were integrated into one core category labelled ‘caught in the eye of the storm’ that neatly explains the low uptake of drug holidays in ADHD. Before medication, children’s behaviour at home and school results in distress in both environments. When they seek medical input, doctors advise parents to start medication for the management of their child’s ADHD. Stimulant medication then helps decrease the child’s impulsiveness and hyperactive behaviour, improving their academic performance as a result. Everyone is therefore appreciative of the power of the medication which is perceived as a mercy that moves the child, to some extent the school, and of course the parents from a position in amidst the storm to the safety of the eye of the storm. Fear of losing this stable state of affairs by agreeing to stop medication, even for a short time accounts for the poor practice ofplanned drug holidays. The children in effect are caught in the eye of a storm from which it is difficult if not impossible to escape until adolescence where they themselves become the decision-makers and many stop their medication altogether at that juncture. Grounded theory has explained the lack of engagement with methylphenidate drug holidays. With parents as the main decision makers until children reach adolescence, performance at school, safety of children at school, and adults’ (parents’ and teachers’) inability to cope with the child’s behaviour become the main drivers for continuing with medication. The risk of losing this sense of security by interrupting treatment impedes efforts to introduce methylphenidate drug holidays. Help with risk assessing drug holidays might improve parents’ decision making in the future. 1. NICE, Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Diagnosis and management of ADHD in children, young people and adult. NICE clinical guideline 72, 2008, NICE: London. 2. Glaser B. G. and Strauss A. L, The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. 1967: New York: Adline de Gruyter.
0961-7671
2-27
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294

Ibrahim, Kinda (2014) Caught in the eye of the storm: explaining the lack of engagement with methylphenidate drug holidays in children with ADHD. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 22 (Suppl_1), 2-27. (doi:10.1111/ijpp.12101).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can be managed medically with stimulant medication such as methylphenidate. Although effective, the long-term impact of methylphenidate on children’s developing brains is unknown and serious side-effects include growth retardation. UK guidelines recommend doctorinitiated 2-week breaks from stimulants after two years of prescribing to test the continuing need for medication [1]. Locally too, shared-care arrangements between consultants at Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (BHFT) and General Practitioners (GPs) encourage both groups to consider and discuss these drug holidays with parents of children prescribed methylphenidate. But evidence suggested little engagement with this practice. Our aim was to understand and explain why methylphenidate drug holidays rarely take place in actual practice. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) consultants (n = 8), GPs (n = 8), and teachers (n = 3) who deal with children with ADHD in Berkshire, UK. Both CAMHS consultants and teachers were approached via email through a secondary source; GPs were approached through the post. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and then analyzed using Grounded theory methodology[2]. Future parent interviews are planned as part of the ongoing validation process. This work was approved by the University of Reading Research Ethics Committee, BHFT R&D office and the Thames Valley Primary Care Research Partnership. Five main categories emerged from primary analyses during this study and these were integrated into one core category labelled ‘caught in the eye of the storm’ that neatly explains the low uptake of drug holidays in ADHD. Before medication, children’s behaviour at home and school results in distress in both environments. When they seek medical input, doctors advise parents to start medication for the management of their child’s ADHD. Stimulant medication then helps decrease the child’s impulsiveness and hyperactive behaviour, improving their academic performance as a result. Everyone is therefore appreciative of the power of the medication which is perceived as a mercy that moves the child, to some extent the school, and of course the parents from a position in amidst the storm to the safety of the eye of the storm. Fear of losing this stable state of affairs by agreeing to stop medication, even for a short time accounts for the poor practice ofplanned drug holidays. The children in effect are caught in the eye of a storm from which it is difficult if not impossible to escape until adolescence where they themselves become the decision-makers and many stop their medication altogether at that juncture. Grounded theory has explained the lack of engagement with methylphenidate drug holidays. With parents as the main decision makers until children reach adolescence, performance at school, safety of children at school, and adults’ (parents’ and teachers’) inability to cope with the child’s behaviour become the main drivers for continuing with medication. The risk of losing this sense of security by interrupting treatment impedes efforts to introduce methylphenidate drug holidays. Help with risk assessing drug holidays might improve parents’ decision making in the future. 1. NICE, Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Diagnosis and management of ADHD in children, young people and adult. NICE clinical guideline 72, 2008, NICE: London. 2. Glaser B. G. and Strauss A. L, The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. 1967: New York: Adline de Gruyter.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2014

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 417187
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/417187
ISSN: 0961-7671
PURE UUID: d24d5626-9f1c-42e0-889d-31e175d46c7a
ORCID for Kinda Ibrahim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5709-3867

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jan 2018 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×