The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is off-frequency overshoot caused by adaptation of suppression?

Is off-frequency overshoot caused by adaptation of suppression?
Is off-frequency overshoot caused by adaptation of suppression?
This study is concerned with the mechanism of off-frequency overshoot. Overshoot refers to the phenomenon whereby a brief signal presented at the onset of a masker is easier to detect when the masker is preceded by a “precursor” sound (which is often the same as the masker). Overshoot is most prominent when the masker and precursor have a different frequency than the signal (henceforth referred to as “off-frequency overshoot”). It has been suggested that off-frequency overshoot is based on a similar mechanism as “enhancement,” which refers to the perceptual pop-out of a signal after presentation of a precursor that contains a spectral notch at the signal frequency; both have been proposed to be caused by a reduction in the suppressive masking of the signal as a result of the adaptive effect of the precursor (“adaptation of suppression”). In this study, we measured overshoot, suppression, and adaptation of suppression for a 4-kHz sinusoidal signal and a 4.75-kHz sinusoidal masker and precursor, using the same set of participants. We show that, while the precursor yielded strong overshoot and the masker produced strong suppression, the precursor did not appear to cause any reduction (adaptation) of suppression. Predictions based on an established model of the cochlear input–output function indicate that our failure to obtain any adaptation of suppression is unlikely to represent a false negative outcome. Our results indicate that off-frequency overshoot and enhancement are likely caused by different mechanisms. We argue that overshoot may be due to higher-order perceptual factors such as transient masking or attentional diversion, whereas enhancement may be based on mechanisms similar to those that generate the Zwicker tone.
241-253
Fletcher, Mark
ac11588a-fafe-4dbb-8b3c-80a6ff030546
de Boer, Jessica
ce9b9483-a3ff-4768-8055-677871081c40
Krumbholz, Katrin
7f699726-abf4-4099-9ec2-c6a92a62afe3
Fletcher, Mark
ac11588a-fafe-4dbb-8b3c-80a6ff030546
de Boer, Jessica
ce9b9483-a3ff-4768-8055-677871081c40
Krumbholz, Katrin
7f699726-abf4-4099-9ec2-c6a92a62afe3

Fletcher, Mark, de Boer, Jessica and Krumbholz, Katrin (2015) Is off-frequency overshoot caused by adaptation of suppression? Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 16 (2), 241-253. (doi:10.1007/s10162-014-0498-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This study is concerned with the mechanism of off-frequency overshoot. Overshoot refers to the phenomenon whereby a brief signal presented at the onset of a masker is easier to detect when the masker is preceded by a “precursor” sound (which is often the same as the masker). Overshoot is most prominent when the masker and precursor have a different frequency than the signal (henceforth referred to as “off-frequency overshoot”). It has been suggested that off-frequency overshoot is based on a similar mechanism as “enhancement,” which refers to the perceptual pop-out of a signal after presentation of a precursor that contains a spectral notch at the signal frequency; both have been proposed to be caused by a reduction in the suppressive masking of the signal as a result of the adaptive effect of the precursor (“adaptation of suppression”). In this study, we measured overshoot, suppression, and adaptation of suppression for a 4-kHz sinusoidal signal and a 4.75-kHz sinusoidal masker and precursor, using the same set of participants. We show that, while the precursor yielded strong overshoot and the masker produced strong suppression, the precursor did not appear to cause any reduction (adaptation) of suppression. Predictions based on an established model of the cochlear input–output function indicate that our failure to obtain any adaptation of suppression is unlikely to represent a false negative outcome. Our results indicate that off-frequency overshoot and enhancement are likely caused by different mechanisms. We argue that overshoot may be due to higher-order perceptual factors such as transient masking or attentional diversion, whereas enhancement may be based on mechanisms similar to those that generate the Zwicker tone.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 3 December 2014
Published date: 1 April 2015

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 417350
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/417350
PURE UUID: c681eb18-e560-4b5d-a565-cece6fe426ae

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Jan 2018 17:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 18:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mark Fletcher
Author: Jessica de Boer
Author: Katrin Krumbholz

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×