Effect of contralateral medial olivocochlear feedback on perceptual estimates of cochlear gain and compression
Effect of contralateral medial olivocochlear feedback on perceptual estimates of cochlear gain and compression
The active cochlear mechanism amplifies responses to low-intensity sounds, compresses the range of input sound intensities to a smaller output range, and increases cochlear frequency selectivity. The gain of the active mechanism can be modulated by the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system, creating the possibility of top-down control at the earliest level of auditory processing. In humans, MOC function has mostly been measured by the suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), typically as a result of MOC activation by a contralateral elicitor sound. The exact relationship between OAE suppression and cochlear gain reduction, however, remains unclear. Here, we measured the effect of a contralateral MOC elicitor on perceptual estimates of cochlear gain and compression, obtained using the established temporal masking curve (TMC) method. The measurements were taken at a signal frequency of 2 kHz and compared with measurements of click-evoked OAE suppression. The elicitor was a broadband noise, set to a sound pressure level of 54 dB to avoid triggering the middle ear muscle reflex. Despite its low level, the elicitor had a significant effect on the TMCs, consistent with a reduction in cochlear gain. The amount of gain reduction was estimated as 4.4 dB on average, corresponding to around 18 % of the without-elicitor gain. As a result, the compression exponent increased from 0.18 to 0.27
559-575
Fletcher, Mark
ac11588a-fafe-4dbb-8b3c-80a6ff030546
Krumbholz, Katrin
fab7b5c0-65c2-4273-b957-afed91e0c7f4
de Boer, Jessica
8a021e5c-f46c-4403-a277-027b65f598d3
1 December 2016
Fletcher, Mark
ac11588a-fafe-4dbb-8b3c-80a6ff030546
Krumbholz, Katrin
fab7b5c0-65c2-4273-b957-afed91e0c7f4
de Boer, Jessica
8a021e5c-f46c-4403-a277-027b65f598d3
Fletcher, Mark, Krumbholz, Katrin and de Boer, Jessica
(2016)
Effect of contralateral medial olivocochlear feedback on perceptual estimates of cochlear gain and compression.
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 17 (6), .
(doi:10.1007/s10162-016-0574-8).
Abstract
The active cochlear mechanism amplifies responses to low-intensity sounds, compresses the range of input sound intensities to a smaller output range, and increases cochlear frequency selectivity. The gain of the active mechanism can be modulated by the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system, creating the possibility of top-down control at the earliest level of auditory processing. In humans, MOC function has mostly been measured by the suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), typically as a result of MOC activation by a contralateral elicitor sound. The exact relationship between OAE suppression and cochlear gain reduction, however, remains unclear. Here, we measured the effect of a contralateral MOC elicitor on perceptual estimates of cochlear gain and compression, obtained using the established temporal masking curve (TMC) method. The measurements were taken at a signal frequency of 2 kHz and compared with measurements of click-evoked OAE suppression. The elicitor was a broadband noise, set to a sound pressure level of 54 dB to avoid triggering the middle ear muscle reflex. Despite its low level, the elicitor had a significant effect on the TMCs, consistent with a reduction in cochlear gain. The amount of gain reduction was estimated as 4.4 dB on average, corresponding to around 18 % of the without-elicitor gain. As a result, the compression exponent increased from 0.18 to 0.27
Text
s10162-016-0574-8
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 17 June 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 August 2016
Published date: 1 December 2016
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 417351
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/417351
PURE UUID: f102f9ec-1eff-4d3b-84bc-01f4eeb14c51
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Jan 2018 17:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 18:07
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Katrin Krumbholz
Author:
Jessica de Boer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics