The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Kant on Non-Veridical Experience

Kant on Non-Veridical Experience
Kant on Non-Veridical Experience
In this paper I offer an interpretation of Kant’s theory of perceptual error based on his remarks in the Anthropology. Both hallucination and illusion, I argue, are for Kant species of experience and therefore require the standard co-operation of sensibility and understanding. I develop my account in a conceptualist framework according to which the two canonical classes of non-veridical experience involve error in the basic sense that how they represent the world as being is not how the world is. In hallucination this is due to the misapplication of categories and in illusion to the misapplication of empirical concepts. Yet there is also room in this framework for a distinction in terms of cognitive functionality between the level of experience, which is merely judgementally structured, and that of judgement proper, which involves the free action of a conscious agent. This distinction enables Kant to allow for the otherwise problematic phenomenon of self-aware non-veridicality.
Kant, Non-veridical, experience, perception, error, anthropology, hallucination, illusion
1868-4602
1-22
Stephenson, Andrew
b8c80516-d835-4479-bee0-869d771af0cf
Stephenson, Andrew
b8c80516-d835-4479-bee0-869d771af0cf

Stephenson, Andrew (2011) Kant on Non-Veridical Experience. Kant Yearbook, 3 (1), 1-22. (doi:10.1515/9783110236545.1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In this paper I offer an interpretation of Kant’s theory of perceptual error based on his remarks in the Anthropology. Both hallucination and illusion, I argue, are for Kant species of experience and therefore require the standard co-operation of sensibility and understanding. I develop my account in a conceptualist framework according to which the two canonical classes of non-veridical experience involve error in the basic sense that how they represent the world as being is not how the world is. In hallucination this is due to the misapplication of categories and in illusion to the misapplication of empirical concepts. Yet there is also room in this framework for a distinction in terms of cognitive functionality between the level of experience, which is merely judgementally structured, and that of judgement proper, which involves the free action of a conscious agent. This distinction enables Kant to allow for the otherwise problematic phenomenon of self-aware non-veridicality.

Text
STEKON.1 - Author's Original
Download (249kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 25 July 2011
Keywords: Kant, Non-veridical, experience, perception, error, anthropology, hallucination, illusion

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 417834
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/417834
ISSN: 1868-4602
PURE UUID: 3d6bdca2-5ac3-4ce0-8051-49956238e95b
ORCID for Andrew Stephenson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4590-1307

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Feb 2018 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×