Phase 1 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with R-GDP for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Phase 1 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with R-GDP for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Objective: To evaluate safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) plus rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (R-GDP) in patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Patients received InO plus R-GDP (21-day cycle; six-cycle maximum) using up-and-down dose-escalation schema for gemcitabine and cisplatin to define the highest dosage regimen(s) with acceptable toxicity (Part 1; n = 27). Part 2 (n = 10) confirmed safety and tolerability; Part 3 (n = 18) evaluated preliminary efficacy. Results: Among 55 patients enrolled, 42% were refractory at baseline (median 2 [range, 1-6] prior therapies); 38% had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The highest dosage regimen with acceptable toxicity was InO 0.8 mg/m2, rituximab 375 mg/m2, cisplatin 50 mg/m2, gemcitabine 500 mg/m2 (day 1 only) and dexamethasone 40 mg (days 1-4); this was confirmed in Part 2, in which three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (grade 4 thrombocytopenia [n = 2], febrile neutropenia [n = 2]). Most frequent treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (any grade, 85%; grade ≥3, 75%) and neutropenia (69%; 62%). Overall (objective) response rate (ORR) was 53% (11 complete, 18 partial responses); ORR was 71%, 33%, and 62% in patients with follicular lymphoma (n = 14), DLBCL (n = 21), and mantle cell lymphoma (n = 13), respectively. Conclusions: InO 0.8 mg/m2 plus R-GDP was associated with manageable toxicity, although gemcitabine and cisplatin doses were lower than in the standard R-GDP regimen due to hematologic toxicity. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed; however, these exploratory data should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and short follow-up duration (Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01055496).
Journal Article
10-17
Sangha, Randeep
4b0bbaba-bd22-4fb0-9896-7ced538ed44d
Davies, Andrew
0fe6a40a-10d1-4ade-a7e6-d1dceb2470af
Dang, Nam H
0320c463-d26c-4317-a1de-e26f5d3599cc
Ogura, Michinori
dba2dc3f-ee4b-4ae1-9237-7e183241cb80
MacDonald, David A
ca4ad890-be70-4995-ad45-54e1c1fd0034
Ananthakrishnan, Revathi
c16fbb0a-ff0f-4267-afc7-17ab442996c9
Paccagnella, M Luisa
d631823c-1bf0-42a6-8bab-4668d74fca2e
Vandendries, Erik
c3b72fdd-8e0d-49ce-9d30-8bc17b08ae28
Boni, Joseph
6007476b-2e19-479d-9bf3-0f572d44381a
Goh, Yeow Tee
befa8498-c8e0-47ea-93c7-109698027315
2017
Sangha, Randeep
4b0bbaba-bd22-4fb0-9896-7ced538ed44d
Davies, Andrew
0fe6a40a-10d1-4ade-a7e6-d1dceb2470af
Dang, Nam H
0320c463-d26c-4317-a1de-e26f5d3599cc
Ogura, Michinori
dba2dc3f-ee4b-4ae1-9237-7e183241cb80
MacDonald, David A
ca4ad890-be70-4995-ad45-54e1c1fd0034
Ananthakrishnan, Revathi
c16fbb0a-ff0f-4267-afc7-17ab442996c9
Paccagnella, M Luisa
d631823c-1bf0-42a6-8bab-4668d74fca2e
Vandendries, Erik
c3b72fdd-8e0d-49ce-9d30-8bc17b08ae28
Boni, Joseph
6007476b-2e19-479d-9bf3-0f572d44381a
Goh, Yeow Tee
befa8498-c8e0-47ea-93c7-109698027315
Sangha, Randeep, Davies, Andrew, Dang, Nam H, Ogura, Michinori, MacDonald, David A, Ananthakrishnan, Revathi, Paccagnella, M Luisa, Vandendries, Erik, Boni, Joseph and Goh, Yeow Tee
(2017)
Phase 1 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with R-GDP for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Journal of Drug Assessment, 6 (1), .
(doi:10.1080/21556660.2017.1315336).
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) plus rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (R-GDP) in patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Patients received InO plus R-GDP (21-day cycle; six-cycle maximum) using up-and-down dose-escalation schema for gemcitabine and cisplatin to define the highest dosage regimen(s) with acceptable toxicity (Part 1; n = 27). Part 2 (n = 10) confirmed safety and tolerability; Part 3 (n = 18) evaluated preliminary efficacy. Results: Among 55 patients enrolled, 42% were refractory at baseline (median 2 [range, 1-6] prior therapies); 38% had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The highest dosage regimen with acceptable toxicity was InO 0.8 mg/m2, rituximab 375 mg/m2, cisplatin 50 mg/m2, gemcitabine 500 mg/m2 (day 1 only) and dexamethasone 40 mg (days 1-4); this was confirmed in Part 2, in which three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (grade 4 thrombocytopenia [n = 2], febrile neutropenia [n = 2]). Most frequent treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (any grade, 85%; grade ≥3, 75%) and neutropenia (69%; 62%). Overall (objective) response rate (ORR) was 53% (11 complete, 18 partial responses); ORR was 71%, 33%, and 62% in patients with follicular lymphoma (n = 14), DLBCL (n = 21), and mantle cell lymphoma (n = 13), respectively. Conclusions: InO 0.8 mg/m2 plus R-GDP was associated with manageable toxicity, although gemcitabine and cisplatin doses were lower than in the standard R-GDP regimen due to hematologic toxicity. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed; however, these exploratory data should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and short follow-up duration (Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01055496).
Text
Phase 1 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with R GDP for the treatment of patients with relapsed refractory CD22 B cell non Hodgkin lymphoma
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 March 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 August 2017
Published date: 2017
Keywords:
Journal Article
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 417872
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/417872
ISSN: 2155-6660
PURE UUID: b2c3f106-f26d-4955-b033-654e71210be4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Feb 2018 17:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Randeep Sangha
Author:
Nam H Dang
Author:
Michinori Ogura
Author:
David A MacDonald
Author:
Revathi Ananthakrishnan
Author:
M Luisa Paccagnella
Author:
Erik Vandendries
Author:
Joseph Boni
Author:
Yeow Tee Goh
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics