The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous rituximab versus intravenous rituximab for first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma (SABRINA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous rituximab versus intravenous rituximab for first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma (SABRINA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous rituximab versus intravenous rituximab for first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma (SABRINA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND: Intravenous rituximab is the standard of care in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and is administered over 1·5-6 h. A subcutaneous formulation could reduce patients' treatment burden and improve resource utilisation in health care. We aimed to show the pharmacokinetic non-inferiority of subcutaneous rituximab to intravenous rituximab in follicular lymphoma and to provide efficacy and safety data.

METHODS: SABRINA is a two-stage, randomised, open-label phase 3 study at 113 centres in 30 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had histologically confirmed, previously untreated, CD20-positive grade 1, 2, or 3a follicular lymphoma; Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance statuses of 0-2; bidimensionally measurable disease (by CT or MRI); life expectancy of 6 months or more; adequate haematological function for 28 days or more; and one or more symptoms requiring treatment according to the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by investigators or members of the research team via a dynamic randomisation algorithm to 375 mg/m2 intravenous rituximab or 1400 mg subcutaneous rituximab, plus chemotherapy (six-to-eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [CHOP] or eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone [CVP]), every 3 weeks during induction, then rituximab maintenance every 8 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by selected chemotherapy, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index, and region. The primary endpoint for stage 2 was overall response (ie, confirmed complete response, unconfirmed complete response, and partial response) at the end of induction. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Pooled data from stages 1 and 2 are reported on the basis of the clinical cutoff date of the last patient completing the maintenance phase of the study. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01200758; new patients are no longer being recruited, but some patients are still being followed up.

FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2011, and May 15, 2013, 410 patients were randomly assigned, 205 to intravenous rituximab and 205 to subcutaneous rituximab. Investigator-assessed overall response at the end of induction was 84·9% (95% CI 79·2-89·5) in the intravenous group and 84·4% (78·7-89·1) in the subcutaneous group. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both groups (199 [95%] of 210 in the intravenous group vs 189 [96%] of 197 in the subcutaneous group); the frequency of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was also similar (116 [55%] vs 111 [56%]). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 44 patients (21%) in the intravenous group and 52 (26%) in the subcutaneous group. Serious adverse events occurred in 72 patients (34%) in the intravenous group and 73 (37%) in the subcutaneous group. Administration-related reactions occurred in 73 patients (35%) in the intravenous group and 95 (48%) patients in the subcutaneous group (mainly grade 1 or 2 local injection-site reactions).

INTERPRETATION: Intravenous and subcutaneous rituximab had similar efficacy and safety profiles, and no new safety concerns were noted. Subcutaneous administration does not compromise the anti-lymphoma activity of rituximab when given with chemotherapy.

FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Journal Article
2352-3026
e272-e282
Davies, Andrew
0fe6a40a-10d1-4ade-a7e6-d1dceb2470af
Merli, Francesco
2458f37d-011d-41d0-af5f-262c6a40b161
Mihaljević, Biljana
8edb8a30-35a2-4af7-8797-672dc948bcf8
Mercadal, Santiago
8d0b89a8-19a8-40d7-99e4-82e0de58a9e9
Siritanaratkul, Noppadol
c6868a67-624f-4c49-8724-13da496a1fb2
Solal-Céligny, Philippe
ce4a723c-f6d6-4910-94a2-e34873083a4b
Boehnke, Axel
f35b3db6-495c-49ee-bd10-b949c4895bb6
Berge, Claude
6dbff77b-9d09-4d6a-a0da-da5b10d64685
Genevray, Magali
0e75b846-2640-4661-ab26-269fda998eda
Zharkov, Artem
bc86e9d9-5e18-4e5a-afc8-dfcef07eb27b
Dixon, Mark
5697cf59-bde9-4422-89df-3a5c693e870d
Brewster, Michael
1c63a541-fee9-4505-8eeb-8692d8f6c689
Barrett, Martin
b5cdf1c0-8039-490f-8169-646325c96045
MacDonald, David
b80ccfca-5f50-48e0-94f2-f8b73293f40b
Davies, Andrew
0fe6a40a-10d1-4ade-a7e6-d1dceb2470af
Merli, Francesco
2458f37d-011d-41d0-af5f-262c6a40b161
Mihaljević, Biljana
8edb8a30-35a2-4af7-8797-672dc948bcf8
Mercadal, Santiago
8d0b89a8-19a8-40d7-99e4-82e0de58a9e9
Siritanaratkul, Noppadol
c6868a67-624f-4c49-8724-13da496a1fb2
Solal-Céligny, Philippe
ce4a723c-f6d6-4910-94a2-e34873083a4b
Boehnke, Axel
f35b3db6-495c-49ee-bd10-b949c4895bb6
Berge, Claude
6dbff77b-9d09-4d6a-a0da-da5b10d64685
Genevray, Magali
0e75b846-2640-4661-ab26-269fda998eda
Zharkov, Artem
bc86e9d9-5e18-4e5a-afc8-dfcef07eb27b
Dixon, Mark
5697cf59-bde9-4422-89df-3a5c693e870d
Brewster, Michael
1c63a541-fee9-4505-8eeb-8692d8f6c689
Barrett, Martin
b5cdf1c0-8039-490f-8169-646325c96045
MacDonald, David
b80ccfca-5f50-48e0-94f2-f8b73293f40b

Davies, Andrew, Merli, Francesco, Mihaljević, Biljana, Mercadal, Santiago, Siritanaratkul, Noppadol, Solal-Céligny, Philippe, Boehnke, Axel, Berge, Claude, Genevray, Magali, Zharkov, Artem, Dixon, Mark, Brewster, Michael, Barrett, Martin and MacDonald, David (2017) Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous rituximab versus intravenous rituximab for first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma (SABRINA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Haematology, 4 (6), e272-e282. (doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30078-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous rituximab is the standard of care in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and is administered over 1·5-6 h. A subcutaneous formulation could reduce patients' treatment burden and improve resource utilisation in health care. We aimed to show the pharmacokinetic non-inferiority of subcutaneous rituximab to intravenous rituximab in follicular lymphoma and to provide efficacy and safety data.

METHODS: SABRINA is a two-stage, randomised, open-label phase 3 study at 113 centres in 30 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had histologically confirmed, previously untreated, CD20-positive grade 1, 2, or 3a follicular lymphoma; Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance statuses of 0-2; bidimensionally measurable disease (by CT or MRI); life expectancy of 6 months or more; adequate haematological function for 28 days or more; and one or more symptoms requiring treatment according to the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by investigators or members of the research team via a dynamic randomisation algorithm to 375 mg/m2 intravenous rituximab or 1400 mg subcutaneous rituximab, plus chemotherapy (six-to-eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [CHOP] or eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone [CVP]), every 3 weeks during induction, then rituximab maintenance every 8 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by selected chemotherapy, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index, and region. The primary endpoint for stage 2 was overall response (ie, confirmed complete response, unconfirmed complete response, and partial response) at the end of induction. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Pooled data from stages 1 and 2 are reported on the basis of the clinical cutoff date of the last patient completing the maintenance phase of the study. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01200758; new patients are no longer being recruited, but some patients are still being followed up.

FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2011, and May 15, 2013, 410 patients were randomly assigned, 205 to intravenous rituximab and 205 to subcutaneous rituximab. Investigator-assessed overall response at the end of induction was 84·9% (95% CI 79·2-89·5) in the intravenous group and 84·4% (78·7-89·1) in the subcutaneous group. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both groups (199 [95%] of 210 in the intravenous group vs 189 [96%] of 197 in the subcutaneous group); the frequency of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was also similar (116 [55%] vs 111 [56%]). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 44 patients (21%) in the intravenous group and 52 (26%) in the subcutaneous group. Serious adverse events occurred in 72 patients (34%) in the intravenous group and 73 (37%) in the subcutaneous group. Administration-related reactions occurred in 73 patients (35%) in the intravenous group and 95 (48%) patients in the subcutaneous group (mainly grade 1 or 2 local injection-site reactions).

INTERPRETATION: Intravenous and subcutaneous rituximab had similar efficacy and safety profiles, and no new safety concerns were noted. Subcutaneous administration does not compromise the anti-lymphoma activity of rituximab when given with chemotherapy.

FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 April 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 May 2017
Published date: June 2017
Keywords: Journal Article

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 417971
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/417971
ISSN: 2352-3026
PURE UUID: 02542eb2-05fe-4768-b2c2-1de3572f2cc7
ORCID for Andrew Davies: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7517-6938

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Feb 2018 17:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew Davies ORCID iD
Author: Francesco Merli
Author: Biljana Mihaljević
Author: Santiago Mercadal
Author: Noppadol Siritanaratkul
Author: Philippe Solal-Céligny
Author: Axel Boehnke
Author: Claude Berge
Author: Magali Genevray
Author: Artem Zharkov
Author: Mark Dixon
Author: Michael Brewster
Author: Martin Barrett
Author: David MacDonald

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×