The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An international proposal to ensure the fair treatment of seafarers

An international proposal to ensure the fair treatment of seafarers
An international proposal to ensure the fair treatment of seafarers


The fair treatment of seafarers in the event of a maritime accident remains an urgent priority for the international maritime industry, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO). Following a series of notorious criminal cases in different jurisdictions over two decades, the unfair treatment of seafarers came to the fore, the cases drawing sharp criticism from commentators and especially the international maritime industry. There were great expectations that the resulting guidelines on fair treatment of seafarers in the event of a maritime accident (the Guidelines) would ensure the fair treatment of seafarers. But as this article demonstrates, the expectations have not been fulfilled, and the rights in the Guidelines are often theoretical and illusory, rather than practical and enforceable.

This article breaks new ground in four major respects. First, in 2012, a survey of 3480 seafarers, constructed by the author, found that 81 per cent of seafarers who had faced criminal charges considered that they were treated unfairly. Secondly, the article reports the responses of member states of the IMO to another survey designed by the author which shows that state practice on the implementation of the Guidelines is widely divergent. Thirdly, guidance for member states on the implementation of the Guidelines is proposed for the first time, heretically eschewing an orthodox model law and advocating instead discretionary implementation by reference to the Guidelines. Possible counter-contentions to the guidance are raised and rejected in detail. Fourthly, as a judgment handed down by the author indicates, the Guidelines can be applied by courts without implementing legislation; but this approach is not advocated. Instead, the guidance aims to facilitate the most convenient and expeditious implementation of the Guidelines, ensuring their widespread promulgation and implementation and reversing the incidence of unfair treatment of 1.5 million seafarers around the world.
1478-8586
106–121
Staniland, Hilton
d4fb0241-7fe4-41cc-ab38-07c8506d74cb
Staniland, Hilton
d4fb0241-7fe4-41cc-ab38-07c8506d74cb

Staniland, Hilton (2018) An international proposal to ensure the fair treatment of seafarers. Journal of International Maritime Law, 24 (2), 106–121.

Record type: Article

Abstract



The fair treatment of seafarers in the event of a maritime accident remains an urgent priority for the international maritime industry, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO). Following a series of notorious criminal cases in different jurisdictions over two decades, the unfair treatment of seafarers came to the fore, the cases drawing sharp criticism from commentators and especially the international maritime industry. There were great expectations that the resulting guidelines on fair treatment of seafarers in the event of a maritime accident (the Guidelines) would ensure the fair treatment of seafarers. But as this article demonstrates, the expectations have not been fulfilled, and the rights in the Guidelines are often theoretical and illusory, rather than practical and enforceable.

This article breaks new ground in four major respects. First, in 2012, a survey of 3480 seafarers, constructed by the author, found that 81 per cent of seafarers who had faced criminal charges considered that they were treated unfairly. Secondly, the article reports the responses of member states of the IMO to another survey designed by the author which shows that state practice on the implementation of the Guidelines is widely divergent. Thirdly, guidance for member states on the implementation of the Guidelines is proposed for the first time, heretically eschewing an orthodox model law and advocating instead discretionary implementation by reference to the Guidelines. Possible counter-contentions to the guidance are raised and rejected in detail. Fourthly, as a judgment handed down by the author indicates, the Guidelines can be applied by courts without implementing legislation; but this approach is not advocated. Instead, the guidance aims to facilitate the most convenient and expeditious implementation of the Guidelines, ensuring their widespread promulgation and implementation and reversing the incidence of unfair treatment of 1.5 million seafarers around the world.

Text
Hilton paper - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Hilton_paper - Accepted Manuscript
Download (9MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 April 2018
Published date: 1 April 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 417974
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/417974
ISSN: 1478-8586
PURE UUID: 2b3b15d4-9f60-44f9-9bb4-45f3c6a7e477

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Feb 2018 17:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:53

Export record

Contributors

Author: Hilton Staniland

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×