The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Perirenal hematoma after ureteroscopy: A systematic review

Perirenal hematoma after ureteroscopy: A systematic review
Perirenal hematoma after ureteroscopy: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: With the broadening indications of ureteroscopy (URS) for complex stones and high-risk patients, more URS is being performed and hence there is an increasing risk of major potentially life-threatening complications. We wanted to define the incidence, predisposing factors, management, and long-term sequelae for post-URS perirenal hematoma (PRH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of literature according to Cochrane and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines for all studies reporting on post-URS PRH from 1980 to September 2016. A literature search was conducted through PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library for all English language articles.

RESULTS: Based on a literature search of 210 articles, seven studies (8929 patients) met the inclusion criteria with an incidence of post-URS PRH reported as 0.45% (40 patients, range: 0.15%-8.9% per study) with a mean age of 53 years and a mean stone size of 1.7 cm. The predisposing factors were moderate-severe hydronephrosis, thin renal cortex, prolonged operative duration, hypertension, and preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI). The management strategy varied from conservative management with blood transfusion and antibiotics (n = 22, 55%) to percutaneous drainage (n = 11, 27.5%). Surgical intervention was needed in seven (17.5%) patients. Two of these were emergency angiography of which one proceeded to open nephrectomy. Open surgery with clot removal was done in three patients, nephrostomy for severe hydronephrosis in one patient, and surgery to correct malpositioned stent in one patient. There was one mortality reported, wherein a patient who had postangiography nephrectomy died of multiple organ failure after the intervention.

CONCLUSION: URS related PRH is a rare, but potentially life threatening complication with a small risk of renal loss. Although most cases may be managed conservatively, incidence of PRH can be minimized by control of blood pressure, treatment of preoperative UTI, and reduction in intrarenal pressures and operative time duration.

Adult, Aged, Drainage, Female, Hematoma, Humans, Hydronephrosis, Incidence, Kidney, Kidney Calculi, Male, Middle Aged, Nephrectomy, Nephrotomy, Operative Time, Stents, Treatment Outcome, Ureteroscopy, Urinary Tract Infections, Journal Article, Review
0892-7790
438-445
Whitehurst, Lily A.
feb002b4-5f68-46ae-baee-6fe6a1099b65
Somani, Bhaskar K.
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Whitehurst, Lily A.
feb002b4-5f68-46ae-baee-6fe6a1099b65
Somani, Bhaskar K.
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9

Whitehurst, Lily A. and Somani, Bhaskar K. (2017) Perirenal hematoma after ureteroscopy: A systematic review. Journal of Endourology, 31 (5), 438-445. (doi:10.1089/end.2016.0832).

Record type: Review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With the broadening indications of ureteroscopy (URS) for complex stones and high-risk patients, more URS is being performed and hence there is an increasing risk of major potentially life-threatening complications. We wanted to define the incidence, predisposing factors, management, and long-term sequelae for post-URS perirenal hematoma (PRH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of literature according to Cochrane and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines for all studies reporting on post-URS PRH from 1980 to September 2016. A literature search was conducted through PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library for all English language articles.

RESULTS: Based on a literature search of 210 articles, seven studies (8929 patients) met the inclusion criteria with an incidence of post-URS PRH reported as 0.45% (40 patients, range: 0.15%-8.9% per study) with a mean age of 53 years and a mean stone size of 1.7 cm. The predisposing factors were moderate-severe hydronephrosis, thin renal cortex, prolonged operative duration, hypertension, and preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI). The management strategy varied from conservative management with blood transfusion and antibiotics (n = 22, 55%) to percutaneous drainage (n = 11, 27.5%). Surgical intervention was needed in seven (17.5%) patients. Two of these were emergency angiography of which one proceeded to open nephrectomy. Open surgery with clot removal was done in three patients, nephrostomy for severe hydronephrosis in one patient, and surgery to correct malpositioned stent in one patient. There was one mortality reported, wherein a patient who had postangiography nephrectomy died of multiple organ failure after the intervention.

CONCLUSION: URS related PRH is a rare, but potentially life threatening complication with a small risk of renal loss. Although most cases may be managed conservatively, incidence of PRH can be minimized by control of blood pressure, treatment of preoperative UTI, and reduction in intrarenal pressures and operative time duration.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 19 January 2017
Published date: May 2017
Keywords: Adult, Aged, Drainage, Female, Hematoma, Humans, Hydronephrosis, Incidence, Kidney, Kidney Calculi, Male, Middle Aged, Nephrectomy, Nephrotomy, Operative Time, Stents, Treatment Outcome, Ureteroscopy, Urinary Tract Infections, Journal Article, Review

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 419040
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419040
ISSN: 0892-7790
PURE UUID: d7127605-d7ac-40f4-9222-44da2b1f51b4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Mar 2018 16:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 19:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lily A. Whitehurst

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×