The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

In vitro comparison of maximum pressure developed by irrigation systems in a kidney model

In vitro comparison of maximum pressure developed by irrigation systems in a kidney model
In vitro comparison of maximum pressure developed by irrigation systems in a kidney model

PURPOSE: To evaluate in vitro the maximum pressure generated in an artificial kidney model when people of different levels of strengths used various irrigation systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen people were enrolled and divided in 3 groups based on their strengths. Individual strength was evaluated according to the maximum pressure each participant was able to achieve using an Encore™ Inflator. The irrigation systems evaluated were: T-FlowTM Dual Port, HilineTM, continuous flow single action pumping system (SAPSTM) with the system close and open, Irri-flo IITM, a simple 60-ml syringe and PeditrolTM . Each irrigation system was connected to URF-V2 ureteroscope, which was inserted into an artificial kidney model. Each participant was asked to produce the maximum pressure possible with every irrigation device. Pressure was measured with the working channel (WC) empty, with a laser fiber and a basket inside.

RESULTS: The highest pressure was achieved with the 60 ml-syringe system and the lowest with SAPS continuous version system (with continuous irrigation open), compared to the other irrigation devices (p< 0.0001). Irrespective of the irrigation system, there was a significant difference in the pressure between the WC empty and when occupied with the laser fiber or the basket inside it (p<0.0001). The stratification between the groups showed that the most powerful group could produce the highest pressure in the kidney model with all the irrigation devices in almost any situation. The exception to this was the T-Flow system, which was the only device where no statistical differences were detected among these groups.

CONCLUSION: The use of irrigation systems can often generate excessive pressure in an artificial kidney model, especially with an unoccupied WC of the ureteroscope. Depending on the strength of force applied, very high pressure can be generated by most irrigation devices irrespective of whether the scope is occupied or not.

Journal Article
0892-7790
522–527
Proietti, Silvia
7f914fa5-58b1-4a55-9a48-4c995d26f512
Dragos, Laurian
abd83e0d-c173-42c7-b457-d1a876775668
Somani, Bhaskar K.
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Butticè, Salvatore
c29f62cb-a9a1-4142-9aad-934fe2656bad
Talso, Michele
ca6d9514-cc0d-483e-88e3-e5c0dce66427
Emiliani, Esteban
aa8ffdc6-c992-48e4-8623-454e015a3812
Baghdadi, Mohammed
13c7e604-0d5f-49f1-8242-e7c89224a894
Giusti, Guido
d91eda0c-524b-403a-801b-f1412a3bad62
Traxer, Olivier
2fa78817-b6f8-4f00-b389-c9c9ddbd01f3
Proietti, Silvia
7f914fa5-58b1-4a55-9a48-4c995d26f512
Dragos, Laurian
abd83e0d-c173-42c7-b457-d1a876775668
Somani, Bhaskar K.
ab5fd1ce-02df-4b88-b25e-8ece396335d9
Butticè, Salvatore
c29f62cb-a9a1-4142-9aad-934fe2656bad
Talso, Michele
ca6d9514-cc0d-483e-88e3-e5c0dce66427
Emiliani, Esteban
aa8ffdc6-c992-48e4-8623-454e015a3812
Baghdadi, Mohammed
13c7e604-0d5f-49f1-8242-e7c89224a894
Giusti, Guido
d91eda0c-524b-403a-801b-f1412a3bad62
Traxer, Olivier
2fa78817-b6f8-4f00-b389-c9c9ddbd01f3

Proietti, Silvia, Dragos, Laurian, Somani, Bhaskar K., Butticè, Salvatore, Talso, Michele, Emiliani, Esteban, Baghdadi, Mohammed, Giusti, Guido and Traxer, Olivier (2017) In vitro comparison of maximum pressure developed by irrigation systems in a kidney model. Journal of Endourology, 31 (5), 522–527. (doi:10.1089/end.2017.0005).

Record type: Article

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate in vitro the maximum pressure generated in an artificial kidney model when people of different levels of strengths used various irrigation systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen people were enrolled and divided in 3 groups based on their strengths. Individual strength was evaluated according to the maximum pressure each participant was able to achieve using an Encore™ Inflator. The irrigation systems evaluated were: T-FlowTM Dual Port, HilineTM, continuous flow single action pumping system (SAPSTM) with the system close and open, Irri-flo IITM, a simple 60-ml syringe and PeditrolTM . Each irrigation system was connected to URF-V2 ureteroscope, which was inserted into an artificial kidney model. Each participant was asked to produce the maximum pressure possible with every irrigation device. Pressure was measured with the working channel (WC) empty, with a laser fiber and a basket inside.

RESULTS: The highest pressure was achieved with the 60 ml-syringe system and the lowest with SAPS continuous version system (with continuous irrigation open), compared to the other irrigation devices (p< 0.0001). Irrespective of the irrigation system, there was a significant difference in the pressure between the WC empty and when occupied with the laser fiber or the basket inside it (p<0.0001). The stratification between the groups showed that the most powerful group could produce the highest pressure in the kidney model with all the irrigation devices in almost any situation. The exception to this was the T-Flow system, which was the only device where no statistical differences were detected among these groups.

CONCLUSION: The use of irrigation systems can often generate excessive pressure in an artificial kidney model, especially with an unoccupied WC of the ureteroscope. Depending on the strength of force applied, very high pressure can be generated by most irrigation devices irrespective of whether the scope is occupied or not.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 5 April 2017
Published date: May 2017
Keywords: Journal Article

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 419042
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419042
ISSN: 0892-7790
PURE UUID: 5ec4cf26-4c96-4e7a-bcf2-d0d0df07fad6

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Mar 2018 16:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 19:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Silvia Proietti
Author: Laurian Dragos
Author: Salvatore Butticè
Author: Michele Talso
Author: Esteban Emiliani
Author: Mohammed Baghdadi
Author: Guido Giusti
Author: Olivier Traxer

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×